Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated high local control rates for inoperable early-stage lung cancers. However, 5–15% of patients experience local relapse within the irradiated volume after treatment, with limited curative salvage options. The aim of this review is to clarify the modalities and outcomes after a second course of SBRT in patients with local relapse after a previous lung SBRT. Methods: An exhaustive literature review was conducted to identify, analyse and summarise the results of 21 main studies. Results: Local repeat lung SBRT after a first course of SBRT showed a favourable local control at 1 and 2 years, ranging from 70 to 90% and 45 to 80%, respectively. Good overall survival rates were also observed at 1 and 2 years reaching up to 95% and 85%, respectively. Toxicity was rare but could be severe, with cases of Grade 4 and 5 toxicities (≈5%). An important dose relationship was observed between re-irradiation dose levels and local control, highlighting the importance of precise dosing. The cumulative doses impacting organs at risk were similarly associated with increased radiation-induced toxicity. Central lung lesions presented a higher risk for severe side effects compared to peripheral ones. Conclusions: In conclusion, repeat lung SBRT after a first course of SBRT represents a feasible treatment option in cases of local recurrence. In order to limit severe toxicity, patients must be carefully selected, and particular attention should be given to cumulative doses to organs at risk, as well as tumour location. Thus, further investigations are still needed to refine the optimal parameters for SBRT lung re-irradiation.

Background/Objectives: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been used for decades to improve local control in advanced and recurrent head and neck cancers by delivering a concentrated dose of radiation directly to the tumor bed during surgery. Despite its potential advantages, IORT remains controversial due to its high complication rates and logistical complexity. This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence on IORT in head and neck oncology, evaluating its indications, effectiveness, and limitations. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane systematic review method and reported following PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, were searched for studies evaluating IORT in head and neck cancer. Outcomes of interest included local control rates, overall survival, complications, and treatment logistics. Data were weighted based on patient numbers, and statistical analyses included weighted means and comparative tests. Results: Included in this review are 47 studies that included 2330 patients. The studies were highly heterogeneous, limiting definitive conclusions. IORT was mainly used in stage III/IV or recurrent tumors, with an average dose of 14.7 Gy (range: 1–40 Gy). The five-year local control was 47% to 82%. Complication rates included wound necrosis (22,3%), fistulas 34 (17.8%), and carotid blow-out (14.5%). Logistical constraints remain a major limitation. Conclusions: The heterogeneous data and logistic challenges of IORT in head and neck oncology have limited its use, and the benefits remain uncertain.

Introduction: Significant therapeutic changes have recently occurred in the management of melanoma brain metastases (BMs), both in the field of local treatments, with the rise of stereotactic radiotherapy (RT), as well as in systemic ones, with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies (TT). These advances have brought about new challenges, particularly regarding the potential interactions between new TT (notably BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and irradiation. Through a clinical case, we will discuss a side effect not previously described in the literature: ultra-early pseudoprogression (PP) following brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), in a patient treated with dabrafenib-trametinib.Case presentation: A 61-year-old patient with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma, receiving second-line dabrafenib-trametinib therapy, was referred for SRS on three progressing meningeal implants, without evidence of systemic progression. Four days after the first RT session (1x6 Gy on a fronto-orbital lesion prescribed 5x6 Gy, and 1x20 Gy single fraction on the other lesions), the patient presented with an epileptic seizure. An MRI, compared to the planning MRI ten days earlier, revealed significant progression of the irradiated lesions. The patient’s condition improved with dexamethasone and levetiracetam, and RT was halted out of caution. A follow-up MRI at one month demonstrated a size reduction of all treated lesions. Subsequent imaging at five months revealed further shrinking of the two lesions treated with an ablative dose of 20 Gy, while the under-treated fronto-orbital lesion progressed. These dynamics suggest an initial PP in the three irradiated lesions, followed by good response in the ablatively treated lesions and progression in the partially treated lesion.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this represents the first documented case of ultra-early PP following brain SRS in a patient receiving concomitant dabrafenib-trametinib. It highlights the need for particular vigilance when using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with SRS, and warrants further research into potential treatment interactions between RT and novel systemic agents, as well as the optimal treatment sequence of melanoma BMs.

Le cancer anaplasique de la thyroïde (CAT) compte parmi les cancers les plus agressifs avec une survie médiane de 4 mois et une mortalité spécifique à l...

FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is a new form of RT delivering the dose in milliseconds instead of minutes for conventional RT. This FLASH RT appears much less toxic on normal tissues while the effect on tumors is maintained intact or even improved for hypoxic tumors, as compared to conventional RT. This overview is summarizing the state of the art of FLASH RT and emphasizes the most important features of FLASH that could be exploited for clinical translation.