Andrea Kaifie

Prof. Dr. Andrea Kaifie


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
KTKira Taux
Kira Taux
TKThomas Kraus
Thomas Kraus
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie
Gold is one of the most valuable materials but is frequently extracted under circumstances that are hazardous to artisanal and small-scale gold miners’ health. A common gold extraction method uses liquid mercury, leading to a high exposure in workers. Therefore, a systematic review according to the PRISMA criteria was conducted in order to examine the health effects of occupational mercury exposure. Researching the databases PubMed®, EMBASE® and Web of ScienceTM yielded in a total of 10,589 results, which were screened by two independent reviewers. We included 19 studies in this review. According to the quantitative assessment, occupational mercury exposure may cause a great variety of signs and symptoms, in particular in the field of neuro-psychological disorders, such as ataxia, tremor or memory problems. However, many reported symptoms were largely unspecific, such as hair loss or pain. Most of the included studies had a low methodological quality with an overall high risk of bias rating. The results demonstrate that occupational mercury exposure seriously affects miners’ health and well-being.

1 December 2020 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJennie Yang
Jennie Yang
JBJens Bertram
Jens Bertram
TSThomas Schettgen
Thomas Schettgen
PHPeter Heitland
Peter Heitland
DFDamian Fischer
Damian Fischer
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie

ACAida El-Far Cardo
Aida El-Far Cardo
TKThomas Kraus
Thomas Kraus
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie
Misinformation that accompanied the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to an impaired risk perception, resulting in the refusal of personal protection measures, as well as a reduced willingness to receive a vaccination. In order to identify factors that might influence people’s attitudes towards COVID-19 policies and engagement in mitigation measures, we carried out a cross-sectional study in Germany. Altogether, n = 808 participants completed our questionnaire concerning items on demographics, media consumption, risk perception, and trust in health authorities, as well as willingness to receive a vaccination. An overwhelming majority of our participants perceived SARS-CoV-2 as a health threat (85.7%), and almost two thirds (63.5%) mentioned they would get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 when a vaccination was available. A greater likelihood of vaccination intention was associated with being male (71.5% male vs. 60% female, p < 0.05), left-wing voting, trusting health authorities, using public media as an information source about COVID-19, and, in particular, perceiving COVID-19 as a health threat. A better understanding of factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy is indispensable in order to eliminate doubts, increase vaccination rates, and create herd immunity, to stop further virus transmission.

DFDamian Fischer
Damian Fischer
FSFatima Seidu
Fatima Seidu
JYJennie Yang
Jennie Yang
MFMichael K. Felten
Michael K. Felten
CGCyryl Cezary Garus
Cyryl Cezary Garus
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie
Informal e-waste recycling is associated with several health hazards. Thus far, the main focus of research in the e-waste sector has been to assess the exposure site, such as the burden of heavy metals or organic pollutants. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the health consequences associated with informal e-waste recycling. A questionnaire-based assessment regarding occupational information, medical history, and current symptoms and complaints was carried out with a group of n = 84 e-waste workers and compared to a control cohort of n = 94 bystanders at the e-waste recycling site Agbogbloshie. E-waste workers suffered significantly more from work-related injuries, back pain, and red itchy eyes in comparison to the control group. In addition, regular drug use was more common in e-waste workers (25% vs. 6.4%). Both groups showed a noticeable high use of pain killers (all workers 79%). The higher frequency of symptoms in the e-waste group can be explained by the specific recycling tasks, such as burning or dismantling. However, the report also indicates that adverse health effects apply frequently to the control group. Occupational safety trainings and the provision of personal protection equipment are needed for all workers.

1 June 2020 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie
TSThomas Schettgen
Thomas Schettgen
JBJens Bertram
Jens Bertram
KLKatja Löhndorf
Katja Löhndorf
SWSaskia Waldschmidt
Saskia Waldschmidt
TKThomas Küpper
Thomas Küpper

1 March 2021 in International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
André EsserAndré Esser
André Esser
PZPatrick Ziegler
Patrick Ziegler
Andrea KaifieAndrea Kaifie
Andrea Kaifie
TKThomas Kraus
Thomas Kraus
TSThomas Schettgen
Thomas Schettgen