VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a severe monogenic disorder caused by somatic mutations in ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 (UBA1), characterized by inflammation, cytopenias, and frequent association with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Steroid dependence is common, and targeted therapies have demonstrated limited efficacy. Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent used in MDS, has shown potential in VEXAS syndrome but data remain limited. This multicenter retrospective study assessed AZA efficacy and safety in 88 patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS syndrome from FRENVEX (French VEXAS study group), 80% meeting World Health Organization 2022 MDS criteria. Inflammatory response rates were 41% at 6 months and 54% at 12 months, regardless of MDS status. A total of 50 (61%) patients achieved inflammatory response, with 70% occurring at 6 months, suggesting a delayed median response. Among responders, relapse-free survival on AZA was 90% at 1 year and 85% at 5 years. Of the 12 responders who discontinued AZA, 9 relapsed after a median of 3.1 years (range, 0.4-5.6), with effective reexposure in 4 of 5 patients. Hematological responses included red blood cell transfusion independence in 65% and platelet improvement in 77% of patients. Molecular response, defined as a ≥25% reduction in UBA1 variant allele frequency (VAF), was observed in 65% of patients, all of whom achieved inflammatory and hematological responses; and VAF dropped to <2% in 43% of cases. Infections (34%) and cytopenias (36%) were common, particularly during the first 3 cycles. This study establishes AZA as an effective therapy for VEXAS syndrome, improving inflammation, cytopenias, and UBA1 clonal burden, warranting larger prospective trials.

Classifications of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients rely on morphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features. Here we have established a novel flow cytometry-based immunophenotypic stratification showing that AML blasts are blocked at specific stages of differentiation where features of normal myelopoiesis are preserved. Six stages of leukemia differentiation-arrest categories based on CD34, CD117, CD13, CD33, MPO, and HLA-DR expression were identified in two independent cohorts of 2087 and 1209 AML patients. Hematopoietic stem cell/multipotent progenitor-like AMLs display low proliferation rate, inv(3) or RUNX1 mutations, and high leukemic stem cell frequency as well as poor outcome, whereas granulocyte–monocyte progenitor-like AMLs have CEBPA mutations, RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 translocations, lower leukemic stem cell frequency, higher chemosensitivity, and better outcome. NPM1 mutations correlate with most mature stages of leukemia arrest together with TET2 or IDH mutations in granulocyte progenitors-like AML or with DNMT3A mutations in monocyte progenitors-like AML. Overall, we demonstrate that AML is arrested at specific stages of myeloid differentiation (SLA classification) that significantly correlate with AML genetic lesions, clinical presentation, stem cell properties, chemosensitivity, response to therapy, and outcome.

The prognostic impact of immunophenotypic CD34⁺CD38⁻CD123⁺ leukemic stem cell (iLSC) frequency at diagnosis has been demonstrated in younger patients treated by intensive chemotherapy, however, this is less clear in older patients. Furthermore, the impact of iLSC in patients treated by hypomethylating agents is unknown. In this single-center study, we prospectively assessed the CD34⁺CD38⁻CD123⁺ iLSC frequency at diagnosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients aged 60 years or older. In a cohort of 444 patients, the median percentage of iLSC at diagnosis was 4.3%. Significant differences were found between treatment groups with a lower median in the intensive chemotherapy group (0.6%) compared to hypomethylating agents (8.0%) or supportive care (11.1%) (p 0.10% (p = 0.031). In the multivariate analyses of this group, iLSC frequency was significantly and independently associated with the incidence of relapse, event-free, relapse-free, and overall survival. However, iLSC frequency had no prognostic impact on patients treated by hypomethylating agents. Thus, the iLSC frequency at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor in older acute myeloid patients treated by intensive chemotherapy but not hypomethylating agents.

Postremission treatment is crucial to prevent relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine delivered every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 (HDAC-135) is the standard of care for younger adult patients with AML. Although this standard has been unsuccessfully challenged by other treatment regimens, including multiagent chemotherapy, the timing of HDAC administration has attracted little attention. Here, we retrospectively compared the safety, efficacy, and health care resource consumption associated with HDAC-135 and another standard, condensed HDAC-123 regimen, as consolidation treatment in younger AML patients in first complete response. This study included 221 patients (median age, 46.6 years; range, 18-60 years). HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 were used in 92 and 129 patients, respectively. Both regimens were associated with similar rates of relapse-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival, including in core binding factor AML subgroup in which levels of minimal residual disease reduction were similar in both schedules. Hematological recovery times regarding neutrophils and platelets were significantly shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123, with an average difference of 3 to 4 days for each consolidation cycle. The total duration of hospitalization for the whole postremission program was shorter with HDAC-123 (32 days; interquartile ratio [IQR], 22.0,36.5) compared with HDAC-135 (41 days; IQR, 30.5, 50.0) (P < .0001). In conclusion, the condensed HDAC-123 regimen induced faster hematological recovery and therefore significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without affecting treatment response or outcome in younger AML patients.

Recent studies have highlighted the role of vitamin C and D in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In 2018, we changed our practices to add both vitamins to the supportive care for all consecutive patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients treated before and after this change in practice. From 2015 to 2020, 431 patients were included, 262 of whom received no supplementation and 169 of whom received vitamin supplementation. Vitamin C and vitamin D was administered from day 10 of chemotherapy until hematologic recovery from induction and consolidation. Most patients presented at diagnosis with low levels of vitamin C and D. Upon recovery from induction, vitamin D levels among the vitamin C/D group significantly increased compared with those at diagnosis, and pretransplant levels were significantly higher in the vitamin C/D group compared with the control group (median of 33 vs 19 ng/mL; P < .0001). During induction, the rates of bacterial or fungal infection, hemorrhage, or macrophage activation syndrome were lower in the vitamin C/D group, whereas there was no difference in response rate, relapse incidence, and overall survival (OS). However, the multivariate analysis for OS showed a significant interaction between vitamin C/D and NPM1 mutation, meaning that vitamin C/D supplementation was significantly and independently associated with better OS in patients with NPM1 mutations (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.90; P = .019) compared with patients with wild-type NPM1 (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68-1.51; P = .95). In conclusion, vitamin C/D supplementation is safe and could influence the outcomes of patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.

Purpose: Acute myeloid leukemias (AML) are clonal diseases that develop from leukemic stem cells (LSC) that carry an independent prognostic impact on the initial response to induction chemotherapy, demonstrating the clinical relevance of LSC abundance in AML. In 2018, the European LeukemiaNet published recommendations for the detection of measurable residual disease (Bulk MRD) and suggested the exploration of LSC MRD and the use of multiparametric displays. Experimental Design: We evaluated the performance of unsupervised clustering for the post-induction assessment of bulk and LSC MRD in 155 patients with AML who received intensive conventional chemotherapy treatment. Results: The median overall survival (OS) for Bulk+ MRD patients was 16.7 months and was not reached for negative patients (HR, 3.82; P < 0.0001). The median OS of LSC+ MRD patients was 25.0 months and not reached for negative patients (HR, 2.84; P = 0.001). Interestingly, 1-year (y) and 3-y OS were 60% and 39% in Bulk+, 91% and 52% in Bulk-LSC+ and 92% and 88% in Bulk-LSC−. Conclusions: In this study, we confirm the prognostic impact of post-induction multiparametric flow cytometry Bulk MRD in patients with AML. Focusing on LSCs, we identified a group of patients with negative Bulk MRD but positive LSC MRD (25.8% of our cohort) with an intermediate prognosis, demonstrating the interest of MRD analysis focusing on leukemic chemoresistant subpopulations.