Objectives: Social factors play a crucial role in health outcomes for pediatric patients, yet in the neurosurgery pediatric literature, these factors are rarely reported. To develop a deeper understanding of pediatric spine trauma outcomes, we investigate demographic and social factors measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and Social Deprivation Index (SDI). We hypothesize that social factors predict clinical presentation, injury severity, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients treated for spinal trauma at a Level 1 trauma center in Sacramento, California. We collected patient clinical data such as mechanisms of injury (MOIs), length of stay (LOS), treatment type, hospital disposition, polytrauma incidence, and follow-up attendance. Each patient’s social environment was characterized using COI and SDI metrics. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess associations between social factors and clinical outcomes. Results: Patients with worse childhood opportunity (lower COI and higher SDI) were more likely to be insured through Medi-Cal, identify as Hispanic, and experience violent MOI. Female patients were more likely to sustain polytrauma and had a higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention. Additionally, patients from underserved communities demonstrated longer hospital stays and poorer follow-up adherence, with COI and SDI scores correlating with these disparities. Conclusion: Social disparities are associated with worse outcomes in pediatric spine trauma. We found COI and SDI to be valuable clinical metrics, motivating further research to be carried out at the state and national levels. These findings highlight health disparities in pediatric spine trauma.

Background: Chronic renal pain secondary to urological pathology can severely affect a patient’s quality of life. Utero Pelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) and Loin Pain Hematuria Syndrome (LPHS) are two conditions known to cause chronic renal pain that can be refractory to conventional treatments. Recent publications demonstrate neuromodulation as an effective treatment option for refractory renal pain. The purpose of this review is to (1) provide evidence from a patient case demonstrating the expanding clinical application of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for refractory renal pain; (2) provide a review of the literature surrounding UPJO/LPHS and SCS; and (3) express a call to action to investigate the clinical applications of neuromodulation and SCS to treatment-resistant genitourinary pathologies. Methods: We performed a search across PubMed and Web of Science databases to search for patients with UPJO/LPHS who had chronic renal/flank pain and were treated with SCS. Results: In our review, we included five case reports/series (including our own) of eight patients who had chronic flank pain secondary to the genitourinary pathologies UPJO and LPHS. Some patients have been having renal pain for up to 20 years, with all patients experiencing significant or complete alleviation of pain after SCS despite multiple failed attempts with other modalities. Five patients had complete resolution of pain and four patients were able to discontinue their pain medications entirely. Conclusions: SCS is gaining traction in its versatility in the management of various chronic pathologies beyond just CNS conditions. Specifically, UPJO and LPHS are examples of urogenital conditions that may benefit from using SCS. Our case shows an exciting opportunity for managing clinical symptoms in patients who have these conditions but have not undergone surgery for many reasons. Our review and clinical report suggest more research is needed in the application of SCS to genitourinary conditions and those experiencing refractory chronic pain.

Background/Objective: Smoking is known to impair fracture healing and worsen surgical outcomes, but its effect on psychological recovery in spine trauma patients remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess how smoking affects pain and anxiety in patients with spine fractures treated either conservatively or surgically. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis looking at spine fracture patients > 18 years old seen at a single institution between 11/2015 and 9/2019. Patient variables such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, mechanism of injury, fracture location, presence of spinal cord injury, surgical intervention, hospital and ICU LOS, disposition, and EQ-5D-3L at 3 and 12 months were collected and analyzed. Results: Non-operative management was selected for 403 patients, of which 304 never smoked and 99 were smokers. Surgical management was utilized for 126 patients, of which 90 never smoked and 36 were smokers. Studying non-smokers and current smokers, higher levels of extreme pain and anxiety at 3 and 12 months were reported in smokers managed conservatively. Smokers managed surgically reported higher levels of pain and anxiety than non-smokers at 3 months but not at 12 months. No significant differences were seen with regards to changes in pain or anxiety between the 3- and 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: Smoking is independently associated with higher levels of pain and anxiety in conservatively managed spine fracture patients. These findings suggest a need for early intervention and cessation efforts in the trauma setting. Further investigation is warranted to clarify whether underlying psychological or physiological phenomena are impacting patient outcomes.

Social factors play a crucial role in health outcomes for pediatric patients, yet in the neurosurgery pediatric literature, these factors are rarely reported. To develop a deeper understanding of pediatric spine trauma outcomes we investigate demographic and social factors measured by the Child Opportunity Index (COI) and Social Deprivation Index (SDI). We hypothesize that socioeconomic factors predict clinical presentation, injury severity, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients treated for spinal trauma at a Level 1 trauma center in Sacramento, California. We collected patient clinical data such as mechanisms of injury (MOI), length of stay (LOS), treatment type, hospital disposition, polytrauma incidence, and follow-up attendance. Each patient’s socioeconomic environment was characterized using COI and SDI metrics. Statistical comparisons were performed to assess associations between socioeconomic factors and clinical outcomes. Results: Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) (lower COI and higher SDI) were more likely to be insured through Medi-Cal, identify as Hispanic, and experience violent MOI. Female patients were more likely to sustain polytrauma and had a higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention. Additionally, patients from underserved communities demonstrated longer hospital stays and poorer follow-up adherence, with COI and SDI scores significantly correlating with these disparities. Conclusion: Socioeconomic disparities are significantly associated with outcomes in pediatric spine trauma. We found COI and SDI to be valuable clinical metrics, motivating further research to be done at a state and national level. These findings highlight health disparities in pediatric spine trauma.