We evaluated tumour volume changes in patients with lung cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy using image-guided radiotherapy (RT). The kilovoltage image was obtained using CT on rail at every five fractions. The gross tumour volumes (GTVs), including the primary tumour and lymph nodes (LNs), were contoured to analyse the time and degree of tumour regression. 46 patients [32, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 14, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)] were included in this study. In total, 281 CT scans and 82 sites of GTVs were evaluated. Significant volume changes occurred in both the NSCLC and SCLC groups (p < 0.001 and 0.002), and the average GTV change compared with baseline was 49.85 ± 3.65 [standard error (SE)]% and 65.95 ± 4.60 (SE)% for the NSCLC and SCLC groups, respectively. A significant difference in the degree of volume reduction between the primary tumour and LNs was observed in only the NSCLC group (p < 0.0001) but not in the SCLC group (p = 0.735). The greatest volume regression compared with the volume before the five fractions occurred between the 15 and 20 fractions in the NSCLC group and between the 5 and 10 fractions in the SCLC group. Both primary tumour and LNs were well defined using CT on rail. Significant volume changes occurred during RT, and there was a difference in volume reduction between the NSCLC and SCLC groups, regarding the degree and timing of the tumour reduction in the primary tumour and LNs. NSCLC and SCLC groups showed differences in the degree and timing of volume reduction. The primary tumour and LNs in NSCLC regressed differently.

Objectives: Few studies have analyzed surgical site infections associated with hypofractionated RT. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for surgical site infections with a particular focus on volumetric parameters that reflect the size of the volumes treated, including tumors, surgical cavities, and breasts. Methods: A total of 145 early breast cancer patients who were surgically staged 0—II undergoing hypofractionated RT on the whole breast were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor size (cm) was measured from surgical pathology. Surgical cavity volume (cc) and breast volume (cc) were calculated by segmenting each axial slice of simulation CT. The cavity-to-breast ratio (%) was calculated as surgical cavity volume/breast volume × 100. Results: The incidence of surgical site infection was 4.8% at a median of 6.3 months after the completion of RT. In univariate analysis, tumor size (OR 2.01, p = 0.025), surgical cavity volume (OR 1.03, p = 0.013), cavity-to-breast ratio (OR 1.29, p = 0.005), and BMI (OR 1.23, p = 0.014) were significantly associated with surgical site infection. In multivariate analysis, the cavity-to-breast ratio (OR 1.24, p = 0.039) remained significantly associated with surgical site infection. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of volumetric parameters, specifically the cavity-to-breast ratio, as significant predictors of surgical site infection in a pure cohort of early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and hypofractionated RT. Tailored approaches, including the use of prophylactic antibiotics, prophylactic aspiration, and close follow-up, may reduce the morbidity associated with surgical site infection and prevent the potential compromise of tumor outcomes.