Andreea Rusescu

Dr. Andreea Rusescu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Narcis-Valentin TănaseNarcis-Valentin Tănase
Narcis-Valentin Tănase
Razvan HainarosieRazvan Hainarosie
Razvan Hainarosie
LBLacramioara Brinduse
Lacramioara Brinduse
DCDan Corneci
Dan Corneci
CVCatalina Voiosu
Catalina Voiosu
VZViorel Zainea
Viorel Zainea
Background: Optimizing sedative techniques for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) enhances accuracy and reproducibility in tailoring treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Schnider and Eleveld pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models, which predict propofol concentration in effect-site compartment based on patient-specific parameters, were utilized to guide intravenous sedation in this study. We compared the effectiveness of propofol sedation guided by the novel general-purpose Eleveld model versus the Schnider model using target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems. Methods: We investigated twenty-five adult OSA patients, randomized into two groups: the Schnider model group (n = 12) and the Eleveld model group (n = 13). DISE was conducted following standardized protocols, targeting effect-site concentration TCI mode. Data concerning sedation levels, effect-site concentration of propofol, procedural timing, propofol dosages, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, and any procedural incidents were collected. Results: DISE was performed successfully in all enrolled patients from both groups. A significant difference was observed in the effect-site concentration of propofol (CeP) at the moment of endoscopy between the Eleveld and Schnider groups (2.1 ± 0.4 µg/mL vs. 3.3 ± 0.7 µg/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). The E group also demonstrated a shorter time to attain the optimal sedation plane compared to the S group (6.1 ± 1.7 vs. 9.8 ± 2.2 min, respectively; p < 0.001) and a reduced total procedural time (11.2 ± 1.4 vs. 15.0 ± 2.1 min, respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. Conclusions: The Eleveld model demonstrated a shorter time to achieve the optimal sedation plane, a shorter total procedural time, and a significant difference in effect-site concentration at the time of endoscopy compared to the Schnider model. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups, suggesting that the Eleveld model may offer improved efficiency without compromising safety during DISE.

17 October 2025 in Actuators
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLuana-Maria Gherasie
Luana-Maria Gherasie
VZViorel Zainea
Viorel Zainea
Razvan HainarosieRazvan Hainarosie
Razvan Hainarosie
ARAndreea Rusescu
Andreea Rusescu
IGIonita Irina Gabriela
Ionita Irina Gabriela
CVCatalina Voiosu
Catalina Voiosu
Background: Stapes prostheses represent one of the earliest and most widely applied “biomedical actuators” designed to restore hearing in patients with otosclerosis. Unlike conventional actuators, which convert energy into motion, stapes prostheses function as passive or smart micro-actuators, transmitting and modulating acoustic energy through the ossicular chain. Objective: This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of stapes prostheses from an engineering and biomedical perspective, emphasizing design principles, materials science, and recent innovations in smart actuators based on shape-memory alloys combined with surgical applicability. Methods: A narrative review of the evolution of stapes prostheses was consolidated by institutional surgical experience. Comparative evaluation focused on materials (Teflon, Fluoroplastic, Titanium, Nitinol) and design solutions (manual crimping, clip-on, heat-activated prostheses). Special attention was given to endoscopic stapes surgery, which highlights the ergonomic and functional requirements of new device designs. Results: Traditional fluoroplastic and titanium pistons provide reliable sound conduction but require manual crimping, with a higher risk of incus necrosis and displacement. Innovative prostheses, particularly those manufactured from nitinol, act as self-crimping actuators activated by heat, improving coupling precision and reducing surgical trauma. Emerging designs, including bucket-handle and malleus pistons, expand applicability to complex or revision cases. Advances in additive manufacturing and middle ear cement fixation offer opportunities for customized, patient-specific actuators. Conclusions: Stapes prostheses have evolved from simple passive pistons to innovative biomedical actuators exploiting shape-memory and biocompatible materials. Future developments in stapes prosthesis design are closely linked to 3D printing technologies. These developments have the potential to enhance acoustic performance, durability, and patient outcomes, thereby bridging the gap between otologic surgery and biomedical engineering.

30 November 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMaria Denisa Zica
Maria Denisa Zica
CVCatalina Voiosu
Catalina Voiosu
ARAndreea Rusescu
Andreea Rusescu
IGIonita Irina Gabriela
Ionita Irina Gabriela
LGLuana-Maria Gherasie
Luana-Maria Gherasie
VZViorel Zainea
Viorel Zainea
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the surgical management and outcomes of lateral semicircular canal fistulas (LSCFs) in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma, focusing on hearing preservation and vestibular function. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on nine adult patients diagnosed with LSCFs secondary to cholesteatoma who underwent surgery at a tertiary referral center between 2018 and 2024. The preoperative evaluation included otoscopy, audiometry, vestibular testing (HINTS), and high-resolution CT (HRCT) of the temporal bone. Surgical techniques included canal wall up (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy, depending on the disease extent. Cholesteatoma matrix removal from the fistula was performed carefully. Fistula closure involved layered grafts of temporalis fascia, temporalis muscle, and/or gelfoam. The postoperative follow-up included audiometry and vestibular assessments. Results: Nine patients with LSCFs were identified (one Type III, three Type IIb, and four Type I/IIa). Five patients were found to have additional disease complications intraoperatively, including facial nerve involvement and middle fossa dehiscence. Postoperatively, hearing outcomes varied, with some patients experiencing improvement, others demonstrating stable hearing, and some exhibiting further decline, particularly in cases with extensive disease. Vestibular symptoms, including vertigo, generally resolved postoperatively, although some patients required prolonged vestibular rehabilitation. Conclusions: LSCF management in cholesteatoma surgery requires a careful preoperative assessment, meticulous surgical technique, and individualized fistula closure based on the size and type. While hearing preservation remains a challenge, particularly in extensive cases, the “underwater technique” and layered grafting may contribute to minimizing further damage and promoting fistula closure. Vestibular rehabilitation plays a crucial role in managing postoperative balance issues. A long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for recurrence and assess both auditory and vestibular function.

4 June 2026 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAlexandra Madalina Bizdu Branovici
Alexandra Madalina Bizdu Branovici
LGLuana-Maria Gherasie
Luana-Maria Gherasie
MZMaria Denisa Zica
Maria Denisa Zica
ARAndreea Rusescu
Andreea Rusescu
IGIonita Irina Gabriela
Ionita Irina Gabriela
VZViorel Zainea
Viorel Zainea
Background: Otogenic lateral sinus thrombosis (OLST) is a rare but potentially life-threatening intracranial complication of middle-ear infection. Despite advances in imaging, antimicrobial therapy and otologic surgery, optimal management—particularly anticoagulation—remains controversial, and no standardized clinical guideline is available. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using PubMed for English-language human studies published between 1 January 2015 and 31 January 2025. The search was repeated and documented during revision on 12 May 2026. Four searches were run separately; retrieved records were manually merged, and duplicate record occurrences were removed using PMID. The searches retrieved 83 records before deduplication; after removal of 19 duplicates, 64 unique records remained for title and abstract screening. Single case reports and review articles were excluded from the primary descriptive synthesis. SANRA principles guided review quality and transparency. Seven eligible studies comprising 140 confirmed OLST patients were analyzed descriptively; selected clinically relevant but non-comparable publications were retained for contextual discussion. Results: Most included cohorts were pediatric; one study included both pediatric and adult patients. Clinical presentation was heterogeneous and often attenuated by prior antibiotic exposure. Contrast-enhanced CT was frequently used initially, whereas MRI/MRV was most informative for confirming thrombus extent and follow-up. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and surgical source control represented core treatment. Anticoagulation was reported in six studies, most often with low molecular weight heparin, but indications and duration varied substantially. Outcomes were generally favorable, although visual impairment, hearing loss, behavioral sequelae and incomplete radiological recanalization were reported. Conclusions: OLST management should be individualized according to disease severity, thrombus extent, septic status, and patient-specific risk factors. Antibiotics and source control are essential, while anticoagulation should be considered selectively. A practical management algorithm is proposed, but prospective multicenter data are needed.

28 April 2026 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMahmoud Daoud
Mahmoud Daoud
LGLuana-Maria Gherasie
Luana-Maria Gherasie
MFMaria Louise Fufezan
Maria Louise Fufezan
Razvan HainarosieRazvan Hainarosie
Razvan Hainarosie
CVCatalina Voiosu
Catalina Voiosu
VZViorel Zainea
Viorel Zainea
Background: Nasal valve dysfunction (NVD) is a common yet underrecognized cause of nasal airway obstruction, with a significant impact on quality of life. Despite its clinical relevance, no universally accepted diagnostic standard exists, and optimal management remains debated. Multiple diagnostic tools and surgical or minimally invasive treatments have been proposed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate current evidence regarding diagnostic approaches and treatment outcomes in NVD. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between January 1990 and January 2026, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparative studies, cohort studies, and case series (≥10 patients) assessing diagnostic methods or therapeutic interventions for NVD were included. Diagnostic data were synthesized narratively. The primary surgical outcome was change in the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and QUADAS-2 tools. Results: Seventy-two primary clinical studies were included (15 diagnostic, 57 treatment-focused). Objective airflow measurements, particularly rhinomanometry and peak nasal inspiratory flow, showed greater reliability than isolated clinical maneuvers. Imaging modalities provided anatomical detail but correlated inconsistently with symptoms. Meta-analysis of 12 studies (n = 1210 patients) suggests that both traditional surgical and minimally invasive interventions can substantially improve nasal breathing, with mean NOSE score reductions of 40–55 points, though heterogeneity precludes direct comparison of their relative effectiveness. Conclusions: Diagnosis of NVD requires a multimodal approach combining clinical assessment, validated symptom scores, and selective objective testing. Surgical and minimally invasive treatments provide substantial symptom improvement when appropriately indicated. Evidence is constrained by the predominance of observational data, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostics and robust comparative trials.

16 September 2026 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAlexandru Vlase
Alexandru Vlase
DPDragos Octavian Palade
Dragos Octavian Palade
DMDragos V Munteanu
Dragos V Munteanu
IRIonut Andrei Roman
Ionut Andrei Roman
SMStefan Moscalu
Stefan Moscalu
CVCatalina Voiosu
Catalina Voiosu
Background and Objectives: Benign vocal fold lesions (BVFLs) are common causes of persistent dysphonia, but recurrence estimates are influenced by lesion type, outcome definition, and follow-up. We evaluated recurrence after documented lesion resolution and explored clinical factors and surgical technique. Materials and Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 214 adults with a first documented BVFL diagnosis between January 2022 and December 2024. Clinical records were reviewed through January 2026. Recurrence was defined as lesion reappearance after documented resolution at the initial post-treatment laryngeal assessment; persistent lesions were classified separately. Results: Follow-up was documented in 142 patients (66.4%). Initial lesion resolution was documented in 135 patients, of whom 23 developed recurrence (17.0%); 7 patients had persistent disease at the initial post-treatment assessment. No evaluated demographic or clinical factor was significantly associated with recurrence in univariate analyses. In the secondary exploratory surgical analysis, recurrence occurred in 7/29 patients treated with cold instruments (24.1%) and 3/27 treated with CO2 laser (11.1%; OR 2.55, 95% CI 0.58–11.08; Fisher exact p = 0.299). Conclusions: Documented recurrence after initial lesion resolution occurred in 17.0% of patients. The surgical technique comparison was underpowered and unadjusted and does not establish superiority of either technique. Variable follow-up and differential attrition should be considered when interpreting the recurrence proportion.