The influenza A virus (IAV) is an important cause of respiratory disease worldwide. It is well known that alveolar epithelial cells are the target cells for the IAV, but there is relatively limited knowledge regarding the role of macrophages during IAV infection. Here, we aimed to analyze transcriptome differences in mouse lungs and macrophage (RAW264.7) cell lines infected with either A/California/04/2009 H1N1 (CA09) or A/chicken/SD/56/2015 H9N2 (SD56) using deep sequencing. The uniquely differentially expressed genes (UDEGs) were analyzed with the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases; the results showed that the lungs infected with the two different viruses had different enrichments of pathways and terms. Interestingly, CA09 virus infection in mice was mostly involved with genes related to the extracellular matrix (ECM), while the most significant differences after SD56 infection in mice were in immune-related genes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of RAW264.7 cells revealed that regulation of the cell cycle was of great significance after CA09 infection, whereas the regulation of the immune response was most enriched after SD56 infection, which was consistent with analysis results in the lung. Similar results were obtained from weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), where cell cycle regulation was extensively activated in RAW264.7 macrophages infected with the CA09 virus. Disorder of the cell cycle is likely to affect their normal immune regulation, which may be an important factor leading to their different prognoses. These results provide insight into the mechanism of the CA09 virus that caused a pandemic and explain the different reactivities of monocytes/macrophages infected by H9N2 and H1N1 IAV subtypes.
Avian viral arthritis (AVA), caused by avian reovirus (ARV), is a viral disease in chickens that has led to significant economic losses in the poultry industry. Recent studies have shown that traditional ARV vaccines based on the S1133 strain fail to protect against emerging ARV variants. In this study, we isolated and characterized three ARV strains (G4, YV, WF) from immunized chicken flocks with respiratory and arthritic symptoms. Genomic analysis revealed that the σC genes of G4, YV, and WF shared only 55.5%, 55.7%, and 58.7% sequence homology, respectively, with the S1133 strain. Phylogenetic analysis placed them in different branches, indicating they are variant strains. YV and WF belong to genotype III, and G4 falls into genotype VI. Whole genome analysis revealed gene segment reassortment among the variants. Pathogenicity testing in three-week-old SPF chickens showed that G4 (genotype VI) caused swelling of footpads, whereas WF (genotype III) did not. G4-infected chickens exhibited significantly higher viral loads in the thymus, lungs, spleen, and bursa of Fabricius than those in the WF-infected chickens, indicating viruses from different genotypes showed various pathogenesis. These results suggested an urgent need for new updates of vaccines against the variant ARVs, especially the genotype VI virus.
During the life cycle of the influenza virus, viral RNPs (vRNPs) are transported to the nucleus for replication. Given that a large number of progeny viral RNA occupies the nucleus, whether there is any host protein located in the nucleus that recognizes the viral RNA and inhibits the viral replication remains largely unknown. In this study, to explore the role of hnRNPH1 in influenza virus infection, we knocked down and over-expressed the hnRNPH1 proteins in 293T cells, then infected the cells with the influenza virus. The results showed that the host hnRNPH1 inhibits the replication of H1N1 and H9N2 influenza viruses by restraining the polymerase activity of viruses. hnRNPH1 contains two RNA recognition motifs (RRM1) and RRM2. Further studies indicated that hnRNPH1 specifically binds to the viral RNA of the PB1, PA, and NP genes. Mutation of the key residues tryptophan and tyrosine in RRM1 and RRM2 abolished the binding affinity to viral RNA and the suppression of polymerase activity of the influenza virus. All the results suggested that hnRNPH1 suppresses polymerase activity and replication of the influenza virus by binding viral RNA.