Background/Objectives: Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Surgery and radiation therapy are the cornerstones of treatment and no standard of care therapy exists for refractory meningiomas. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches against these tumors. Methods: A search for the existing literature on systemic therapies for meningiomas was performed on PubMed and a search for presently accruing clinical trials was performed on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results: Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, somatostatin analogs, anti-hormone therapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy, have been extensively studied with marginal success. Targeted therapies are actively being studied for the treatment of meningiomas, including focal adhesion kinase (FAK), sonic hedgehog signaling pathway, phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) inhibitors. These driver mutations are present only in a subset of meningiomas. In stark contrast, somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is ubiquitously expressed in meningiomas and was formerly targeted with somatostatin analogs with modest success. Theranostic SSTR2-targeting via [⁶⁸Ga]DOTATATE for PET imaging and β-emitting [¹⁷⁷Lu]DOTATATE for the treatment of meningiomas are currently under active investigation. Conclusions: A nuanced approach is needed for the treatment of refractory meningiomas. Targeted therapies show promise.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Despite the current standard of care therapy, including maximal surgical resection, chemoradiation, and tumor-treating fields, prognosis remains poor. Therapeutic failure is driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, poor drug penetration across the blood–brain barrier, and robust resistance mechanisms. Epigenetic alterations further compound treatment resistance by enhancing DNA repair and promoting survival pathways. Molecular profiling has identified key prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Gene expression analyses have delineated GBM subtypes, each with distinct molecular features and therapeutic vulnerabilities that hinder successful clinical translation. This review integrates the pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic landscape of GBM to inform of future strategies for improved patient outcomes.

Central nervous system (CNS) tumor with BCL6 corepressor gene BCOR/BCORL1 fusion is an extremely rare tumor entity, with fewer than 40 cases reported. These tumors are distinct from the WHO 2021-defined CNS tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication. Even rarer are CNS tumors that match to the methylation class of CNS tumors with BCOR/BCORL1 fusion, but lack fusions and instead harbor truncating small nucleotide variants in BCOR. To our knowledge, only two other cases of this scenario have been previously reported. Due to their scarcity and morphological features that mimic oligodendrogliomas and ependymomas, the diagnosis of CNS tumor with BCOR/BCORL1 fusion can be challenging, and misdiagnoses are not uncommon. Histologic findings of Olig2 positivity with focal to absent GFAP warrant further evaluation for this tumor entity. Moreover, no standard of care therapy exists for these tumors, making treatment selection difficult. We present a case of a 37-year-old woman with a midline CNS tumor with BCOR/BCORL1 fusion, harboring a pathogenic BCOR c.626del (p.S209Cfs*7) (Exon 4) variant, who was successfully treated with definitive radiation therapy and adjuvant temozolomide. Notably, EMA showed focal strong dot-like perinuclear immunoreactivity, which has not been previously reported in these tumors. This case adds to the limited but growing body of evidence supporting the use of radiation and temozolomide in treating tumors matching the methylation class of CNS tumors with BCOR/BCORL1 fusion without a detectable fusion.

Background/Objectives: Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) plexiform neurofibroma (PN) can cause morbidity, including disfigurement that can negatively impact social functioning. Historically, the mainstay treatment is surgical resection. However, complete resection is often prohibitive due to multiple nerve involvement. Moreover, post-operative recurrence is common. MEK inhibitors, including selumetinib and mirdametinib, have recently changed the treatment paradigm for these tumors. In 2020, selumetinib was FDA-approved for pediatric NF1 patients with inoperable symptomatic PNs, but selumetinib remains under investigation for their adult counterparts. In 2025, mirdametinib was FDA-approved for use in adults with symptomatic incompletely resectable NF1 PNs. Lower partial response rates have been reported with mirdametinib compared to selumetinib, but direct comparative analyses have not been conducted to establish the superiority of one agent over the other. Results: We present a case of a 38-year-old male with a right facial PN successfully treated with selumetinib, resulting in a 16.77% tumor volumetric reduction over 7 months. Selumetinib was well tolerated in our patient, with an asymptomatic Grade 3 CPK elevation that subsequently improved with a dose reduction. Conclusion: Our case adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that selumetinib is effective and well tolerated in adult patients with NF1-associated PNs.