Background/Objectives: Liver metastases are common among patients with breast cancer and have a poor prognosis if left untreated. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate and compare chemoembolization (TACE) versus radioembolization (TARE) treatments in patients with breast cancer liver-dominant metastases in terms of overall survival (OS), local tumor control (LC), and toxicity. Methods: The S.P.I.D.E.R framework was used to address the clinical question. A systematic literature search using PubMed and Scopus was performed to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of TACE and TARE in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Results: The literature search resulted in 10 articles for TACE, 13 articles for TARE and 1 for combined TACE/TARE, totaling 462 patients for the TACE group and 627 for the TARE group. The median LC was 68.7% for TACE and 78.9% for TARE. The median OS was 15.3 months for TACE and 11.9 for TARE. Progression at three months was 32.5% for TACE and 20.6% for TARE. Conclusions: The included studies were heterogeneous, varying widely in design, patient selection, and therapeutic protocols. Nonetheless, this systematic review suggests that locoregional therapies are effective in the treatment of liver metastases in patients with breast cancer and may improve tumor burden, alleviate symptoms and extend overall survival. The median LC of the liver metastases at three months was higher in the TARE group compared to TACE. However, the TARE group showed lower OS rates after treatment.

Prompt and accurate identification of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors, arising from the gastrointestinal system and from the pancreas, through the means of both anatomical and functional diagnostic imaging techniques is mandatory. A patient’s prognosis and treatment planning are dependent on these diagnostic procedures. The aim of this narrative review is to depict the common appearance of liver metastases, as well as to depict atypical imaging patterns. Moreover, this review will cover the differential diagnosis between liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors and other primary and secondary malignant liver lesions, as well as benign liver lesions.

Purpose: This study aims to provide a meta-analysis of relevant outcomes related to various sclerosant agents used in percutaneous lymphocele sclerotherapy. Materials and Methods: A systematic review, registered on PROSPERO (Record CRD420251180687), was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, including studies reporting any kind of postoperative lymphoceles treated with a sclerosant agent. Searches were updated to November 2025. Pooled success, recurrence, and complication rates were estimated for each sclerosant agent, and differences across agents were explored. The risk of bias was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies, while the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Sixteen studies were included—fifteen retrospective and one prospective—reporting on different sclerosant agents: ethanol, povidone-iodine, OK-432, fibrin glue, polidocanol, and doxycycline. A total of 335 lymphoceles were studied. Ethanol showed the most consistent results, with high clinical success (97.4%, 95% CI 82.6–99.7%) and low recurrence rates across the studies (6.7%, 95% CI 3.1–14.2%). The other sclerosant agents yielded similar results but with a lower grade of evidence certainty. Minor complication rates were low (12.2%), consisting predominantly of mild and self-limiting adverse events; only two major complications were reported. Limitations were heterogeneity among studies and predominance of retrospective designs. Conclusions: Percutaneous sclerotherapy yielded favorable results with all agents; however, ethanol is the best-characterized agent, with consistent outcomes and moderate certainty of evidence. High-quality, prospective research is needed in order to choose the best sclerosant agent and standardize the procedure. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of retrospective non-comparative studies. Graphical

Background: The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved over recent years. Although it appears that the overall number of procedures is declining, international guidelines now endorse TACE beyond the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage, and multiple TACE platforms allow patient-tailored treatments. In this context, degradable starch microspheres TACE (DSM-TACE) may be valuable when the goal is to preserve liver function and spare healthy parenchyma. This study reports multicenter retrospective Italian data to assess the efficacy and safety of DSM-TACE with EmboCept^® in patients with early-to advanced-stage HCC, and to evaluate whether procedural selectivity (superselective vs. lobar) influences outcomes. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 201 patients initially; after applying exclusion criteria, 187 patients (334 HCC nodules) treated across eight centers (2014–2024) were analyzed. Treatment indications were discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards in all centers. Superselective DSM-TACE was performed in 48 patients (66 nodules, 19.8%), while 139 patients (268 nodules, 80.2%) underwent a lobar approach. Repeated sessions were performed on demand and recorded for lobar treatments. Tumor response was assessed using mRECIST criteria at 1, 3–6, 6–9, and 9–12 months; adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). efficacy and safety outcomes were compared according to the DSM-TACE approach. Results: In terms of safety, analysis confirmed the overall good tolerability of DSM-TACE, with no grade ≥ 3 adverse events and no major complications or procedure-related deaths. No significant differences were observed in post-embolization syndrome (PES) rates between groups. With regard to efficacy, for the entire cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 70% at 1 month, 31.6% at 3–6 months, 20.5% at 6–9 months, and 13.5% at 9–12 months, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 91.4% at 1 month, 69% at 3–6 months, 38.6% at 6–9 months, and 27% at 9–12 months. At intermediate follow-up, superselective DSM-TACE achieved higher ORR than lobar treatment at 3–6 months (53.8% vs. 26.4%; p = 0.009) and 6–9 months (43.8% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.009). Per-nodule analysis confirmed this advantage at 3–6 months (ORR = 66.7% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.0008). Conclusions: DSM-TACE with EmboCept^® provides favorable tumor control and a good safety profile in routine clinical practice. A superselective approach is associated with improved response at intermediate follow-up compared with lobar strategy, supporting DSM-TACE as a flexible therapeutic option for localized HCC.

The global burden of liver metastases from different primary lesions is increasing, resulting in significant challenges for public health systems. Accordingly, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with a high incidence of liver metastases. Although surgical resection is considered the standard curative treatment, it is only viable for a limited subset of patients. This review aims to describe a potential alternative nonsurgical intervention, such as electrochemotherapy (ECT), in the treatment of CRC oligometastatic liver disease. ECT has been largely used for the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions, while its visceral use is currently a novel approach. ECT consists of the administration of intravenous anticancer drugs, followed by the application of intralesional electrode needles, which release localized electrical pulses to induce electroporation, a process that transiently increases cell membrane permeability, thereby facilitating the intracellular delivery of otherwise membrane-impermeable drugs. The main topics of this review focus on the technical and clinical applications, efficacy, safety, and possible complications of ECT for CRC liver metastases. A comparison with other locoregional treatments is also performed, highlighting possible advantages and disadvantages.

Cecal volvulus is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, resulting from torsion of the cecum and ascending colon due to abnormal mobility caused by inadequate peritoneal fixation. Clinical presentation is often vague and nonspecific, which can delay diagnosis and treatment. Computed tomography (CT) is the imaging modality of choice, as it not only confirms the presence and location of the volvulus but also identifies serious complications such as ischemia or perforation. Abdominal radiographs may be inconclusive, especially when the twisted bowel loop is fluid-filled, aligned antero-posteriorly, or obscured by adjacent gas-filled loops. We present the case of a 65-year-old woman who arrived at the emergency department with sudden-onset abdominal pain. Abdominal CT revealed classic signs of cecal volvulus, including the rarely reported ‘embryo sign,’ which proved crucial for swift diagnosis and intervention. Recognizing both common and less common CT features, such as the embryo sign, is paramount for rapid diagnosis and appropriate management in emergency situations. Familiarity with the full radiologic spectrum of this condition can significantly improve patient outcomes.