The Central European Watershed divides the Rhine-Main catchment and the Danube catchment. In the Early Medieval period, when ships were important means of transportation, Charlemagne decided to link both catchments by the construction of a canal connecting the Schwabian Rezat and the Altmühl rivers. The artificial waterway would provide a continuous inland navigation route from the North Sea to the Black Sea. The shortcut is known as Fossa Carolina and represents one of the most important Early Medieval engineering achievements in Europe. Despite the important geostrategic relevance of the construction it is not clarified whether the canal was actually used as a navigation waterway. We present new geophysical data and in situ findings from the trench fills that prove for the first time a total length of the constructed Carolingian canal of at least 2300 metres. We have evidence for a conceptual width of the artificial water course between 5 and 6 metres and a water depth of at least 60 to 80 cm. This allows a crossing way passage of Carolingian cargo scows with a payload of several tons. There is strong evidence for clayey to silty layers in the trench fills which reveal suspension load limited stillwater deposition and, therefore, the evidence of former Carolingian and post-Carolingian ponds. These findings are strongly supported by numerous sapropel layers within the trench fills. Our results presented in this study indicate an extraordinarily advanced construction level of the known course of the canal. Here, the excavated levels of Carolingian trench bottoms were generally sufficient for the efficient construction of stepped ponds and prove a final concept for a summit canal. We have evidence for the artificial Carolingian dislocation of the watershed and assume a sophisticated Early Medieval hydrological engineering concept for supplying the summit of the canal with adequate water.

The full extent of past military events can be difficult to appreciate using only historical and documentary accounts. By combining these visual and textual sources with archaeological and geoarchaeological evidence, the authors propose and test an interdisciplinary approach that aims to establish a process-oriented understanding of the genesis and transformation of conflict landscapes. Using the battle site at Vossenack Ridge in Germany as a case study, they demonstrate that such an approach can maximise our understanding of war-related transformations of the landscape, while minimising the damage to sub-surface archaeological materials.

Ground-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been applied successfully for decades in archaeological geophysics. However, there are sometimes severe problems arising in cases of rough terrain, permission to enter a site, or due to vegetation. Other issues may also make it impossible to use conventional ground-based GPR. Therefore, mounting the GPR antenna below a drone could be a potential alternative. Successful applications of drone-based GPR have already been reported, e.g., in the fields of geological mapping, glaciology, and UXO-detection. However, it is not clear whether faint archaeological remains can also be mapped using this approach. In the survey discussed below, we tested such a drone-based GPR setup at an archaeological site in Bavaria, where well-preserved Roman foundations at a shallow depth are known from previous geophysical surveys with magnetics and ground-based GPR. The aim was to evaluate the possibilities and problems arising with this new approach through a comparison with the afore-mentioned data, obtained in previous ground-based surveys of this site. The results show that under certain circumstances, the archaeological remains can be resolved while using a drone. However, the remains are much harder to detect with a lower degree of resolution and survey setup and acquisition time play a crucial role for a successful survey. Especially relevant are two factors: First, the correct choice of profile orientation, as there are strong reflections caused by near-surface features (like field boundaries) due to decoupling the antenna from the ground. Second, a very dry soil is mandatory, as otherwise too much signal is lost at the air-ground-interface. Considering these factors, drone-based GPR represents a valuable tool for modern archaeological geophysics.

Floodplain wetlands are complex systems influenced by many natural and anthropogenic operators. Due to the influence of high and varying groundwater table and high organic contents, geophysical prospection in wetland floodplains quickly reaches the limits of its effectiveness. At the Early Medieval canal Fossa Carolina in southwest Germany, a study design employing magnetometry, drillings, sampling, and in situ rock magnetic measurements was used for environmental magnetic interpretation of magnetic anomalies in magnetograms and sediment layers. This approach offers reliable archaeological interpretation of magnetic anomalies and magnetic properties under the site specific sedimentological conditions of a floodplain wetland. It was also found that man‐made magnetic anomalies in the floodplain are due to the genesis of different remanent magnetizations – specifically, greigite (Fe₃S₄) can cause distinct magnetic anomalies in floodplains that can be recognized readily in surface magnetic data.