Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov

Ms. Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2025 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarianna Dimitrova Kucarov
Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov
MTMátyás Takács
Mátyás Takács
BCBence Czakó
Bence Czakó
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
MKMiklos Kozlovszky
Miklos Kozlovszky
This study evaluated and integrated automatic pathology equipment and a collaborative robot to create a fully autonomous workflow. We selected the Gemini AS Automated Slide Stainer, ClearVue Coverslipper, and Pannoramic 1000 digital slide scanner, controlled by a UR5e robotic arm. To perform essential clinical laboratory tasks, we determined that the robotic arm, in combination with a custom manipulator, requires 9 degrees of freedom—5 from the robot and 4 from the manufactured manipulator. The patented manipulator is equipped with a camera, LED lighting, and three specialized grippers for object detection and precise handling of equipment doors, magazines, and slides. It is designed to mount onto a standardized robot flange interface (ISO 9409-1-50-4-M6), making it mechanically compatible with various robot arms. A minimum of 24 distinct laboratory tasks were defined for the training of the robotic arm. This autonomous workflow mitigates labor shortages and accelerates diagnostic processes by offloading repetitive tasks, thereby improving efficiency in pathology laboratories.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNikolett Szakállas
Nikolett Szakállas
AKAlexandra Kalmár
Alexandra Kalmár
KRKristóf Róbert Rada
Kristóf Róbert Rada
MKMarianna Dimitrova Kucarov
Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov
TLTamás Richárd Linkner
Tamás Richárd Linkner
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is driven by a complex spectrum of somatic mutations and structural variants that contribute to tumor heterogeneity and therapy resistance. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of short-read Illumina and long-read Nanopore sequencing technologies across multiple CRC sample groups, encompassing diverse tissue morphologies. Our evaluation included general base-level metrics—such as nucleotide ratios, sequence match rates, and coverage—as well as variant calling performance, including variant allele frequency (VAF) distributions and pathogenic mutation detection rates. Focusing on clinically relevant genes (KRAS, BRAF, TP53, APC, PIK3CA, and others), we characterized platform-specific detection profiles and completed the ground truth validation of somatic KRAS and BRAF mutations. Structural variant (SV) analysis revealed Nanopore’s enhanced ability to resolve large and complex rearrangements, with consistently high precision across SV types, though recall varied by variant class and size. To enable direct comparison with the Illumina exome panel, we applied an exonic position reference file. To assess the impact of depth and PCR amplification, we completed an additional high-coverage Nanopore sequencing run. This analysis confirmed that PCR-free protocols preserve methylation signals more accurately, reinforcing Nanopore’s utility for integrated genomic and epigenomic profiling. Together, these findings underscore the complementary strengths of short- and long-read sequencing platforms in high-resolution cancer genomics, and we highlight the importance of coverage normalization, epigenetic fidelity, and rigorous benchmarking in variant discovery.

17 July 2025 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMarianna Dimitrova Kucarov
Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov
NSNikolett Szakállas
Nikolett Szakállas
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
MKMiklos Kozlovszky
Miklos Kozlovszky
The rapid advancement of genomic technologies has significantly transformed biomedical research and clinical applications, particularly in oncology. Identifying patient-specific genetic mutations has become a crucial tool for early cancer detection and personalized treatment strategies. Detecting tumors at the earliest possible stage provides critical insights beyond traditional tissue analysis. This paper presents a novel cyber-physical system that combines high-resolution tissue scanning, laser microdissection, next-generation sequencing, and genomic analysis to offer a comprehensive solution for early cancer detection. We describe the methodologies for scanning tissue samples, image processing of the morphology of single cells, quantifying morphometric parameters, and generating and analyzing real-time genomic metadata. Additionally, the intelligent system integrates data from open-access genomic databases for gene-specific molecular pathways and drug targets. The developed platform also includes powerful visualization tools, such as colon-specific gene filtering and heatmap generation, to provide detailed insights into genomic heterogeneity and tumor foci. The integration and visualization of multimodal single-cell genomic metadata alongside tissue morphology and morphometry offer a promising approach to precision oncology.

28 January 2026 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAnnamaria Csizmadia
Annamaria Csizmadia
BMBéla Molnár
Béla Molnár
MKMarianna Dimitrova Kucarov
Marianna Dimitrova Kucarov
KKKrisztian Koos
Krisztian Koos
Róbert PaulikRóbert Paulik
Róbert Paulik
Tibor KrenacsTibor Krenacs
Tibor Krenacs
Introduction: Accurate nuclear segmentation is essential for the reliable diagnostic interpretation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results. However, automated 2D digital algorithms often fail in samples with dense or overlapping nuclei, such as lymphomas, due to the loss of spatial depth information. Here, we tested if AI-based 3D nuclear segmentation can improve the accuracy, reproducibility, and diagnostic reliability of FISH reading in critical situations. Materials and Methods: Formalin-fixed follicular lymphoma sections were FISH-labeled for BCL2 gene rearrangements and digitally scanned in multilayer Z-stacks. The analytic performance in nuclear segmentation of the adaptive thresholding-based FISHQuant, and the freely accessible AI-based NucleAIzer, StarDist, and Cellpose algorithms, were compared to the eye control-based traditional FISH testing, primarily focusing on nuclear segmentation. Results: We revealed that the Cellpose algorithm showed limited sensitivity to low-intensity signals and the adaptive thresholding 2D segmentation, and FISHQuant struggled to resolve densely packed nuclei, occasionally underestimating their counts. In contrast, 3D segmentation across focal planes significantly improved the nuclear separation and signal localization. AI-driven 3D models, especially NucleAIzer and StarDist, showed improved precision, lower variance (VP/VS ≈ 0.96), and improved gene spot correlation (r > 0.82) across multiple focal planes. The similar average number of gene spots per cell nuclei in the AI-based analyses as the eye control counting, despite the elevated number of cell nuclei found with AI, validated the AI nuclear segmentation results. Conclusions: Inaccurate segmentation limits automated diagnostic FISH signal evaluation. Deep learning 3D approaches, particularly NucleAIzer and StarDist, may overcome thresholding and 2D constraints and improve the consistency of nuclear detection, resulting in better classification of pathogenetic gene aberrations with automated workflows in digital pathology.