Tiago N Munhoz

Dr. Tiago N Munhoz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2013 in Cadernos de Saude Publica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISIná S. Santos
Iná S. Santos
BTBeatriz Franck Tavares
Beatriz Franck Tavares
TMTiago N Munhoz
Tiago N Munhoz
LALaura Sigaran Pio de Almeida
Laura Sigaran Pio de Almeida
NSNathália Tessele Barreto da Silva
Nathália Tessele Barreto da Silva
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich
This population-based study focused on the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening major depressive episodes in the general population in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Households were selected by multi-stage sampling, and adults (> 20 years) were invited to participate. The gold standard was the structured diagnostic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), applied by psychiatrists and psychologists. Both the PHQ-9 and the MINI were applied in the subjects' homes. In a total of 447 participants (191 men and 256 women), the continuous analysis identified > 9 as the cutoff point with the highest sensitivity (77.5%; 61.5-89.2) and specificity (86.7%; 83.0- 89.9). Use of the test's algorithm decreased the sensitivity to 42.5% (27.0-59.1), while the specificity increased to 95.3% (92.8-97.2). The PHQ-9 proved appropriate for screening major depressive episodes. For greater sensitivity, the continuously scored PHQ-9 proved more adequate than the algorithm for screening major depressive episodes in the community.


8 October 2014 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich
TMTiago N Munhoz
Tiago N Munhoz
BTBeatriz Franck Tavares
Beatriz Franck Tavares
ABAna Paula Pereira Neto Barbosa
Ana Paula Pereira Neto Barbosa
DSDiego Mello da Silva
Diego Mello da Silva
ISIna Santos
Ina Santos
Standardized questionnaires designed for the identification of depression are useful for monitoring individual as well as population mental health. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has originally been developed to assist primary care health professionals to detect postnatal depression, but several authors recommend its use outside of the postpartum period. In Brazil, the use of the EPDS for screening depression outside the postpartum period and among non-selected populations has not been validated. The present study aimed to assess the validity of the EPDS as a screening instrument for major depressive episode (MDE) among adults from the general population. This is a validation study that used a population-based sampling technique to select the participants. The study was conducted in the city of Pelotas, Brazil. Households were randomly selected by two stage conglomerates with probability proportional to size. EPDS was administered to 447 adults (≥20 years). Approximately 17 days later, participants were reinterviewed by psychiatrics and psychologists using a structured diagnostic interview (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, MINI). We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point of EPDS, and values were plotted as a receiver operator characteristic curve. The best cutoff point for screening depression was ≥8, with 80.0% (64.4 - 90.9%) sensitivity and 87.0% (83.3 - 90.1%) specificity. Among women the best cutoff point was ≥8 too with values of sensitivity and specificity of 84.4% (67.2 – 94.7%) and 81.3% (75.5 – 86.1%), respectively. Among men, the best cutoff point was ≥7 (75% sensitivity and 89% specificity). The EPDS was shown to be suitable for screening MDE among adults in the community.

1 March 2016 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTiago N Munhoz
Tiago N Munhoz
BNBruno P. Nunes
Bruno P. Nunes
FWFernando C. Wehrmeister
Fernando C. Wehrmeister
ISIna Santos
Ina Santos
AMAlicia Matijasevich
Alicia Matijasevich

9 June 2017 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BNBruno P Nunes
Bruno P Nunes
AFAlexandre D P Chiavegatto Filho
Alexandre D P Chiavegatto Filho
SPSanghamitra Pati
Sanghamitra Pati
DTDoralice S Cruz Teixeira
Doralice S Cruz Teixeira
TFThaynã R Flores
Thaynã R Flores
SBSandro Rodrigues Batista
Sandro Rodrigues Batista
Objectives The study aims to evaluate the magnitude of multimorbidity in Brazilian adults, as well to measure their association with individual and contextual factors stratified by Brazilian states and regions. Methods A national-based cross-sectional study was carried out in 2013 with Brazilian adults. Multimorbidity was evaluated by a list of 22 physical and mental morbidities (based on self-reported medical diagnosis and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression). The outcome was analysed taking ≥2 and ≥3 diseases as cut-off points. Factor analysis (FA) was used to identify disease patterns and multilevel models were used to test association with individual and contextual variables. Results The sample comprised 60 202 individuals. Multimorbidity frequency was 22.2% (95% CI 21.5 to 22.9) for ≥2 morbidities and 10.2% (95% CI 9.7 to 10.7) for ≥3 morbidities. In the multilevel adjusted models, females, older people, those living with a partner and having less schooling presented more multiple diseases. No linear association was found according to wealth index but greater outcome frequency was found in individuals with midrange wealth index. Living in states with higher levels of education and wealthier states was associated with greater multimorbidity. Two patterns of morbidities (cardiometabolic problems and respiratory/mental/muscle–skeletal disorders) explained 92% of total variance. The relationship of disease patterns with individual and contextual variables was similar to the overall multimorbidity, with differences among Brazilian regions. Conclusions In Brazil, at least 19 million adults had multimorbidity. Frequency is similar to that found in other Low and and Middle Income Countries. Contextual and individual social inequalities were observed.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BDBianca Del-Ponte
Bianca Del-Ponte
LALuciana Anselmi
Luciana Anselmi
MAMaria Cecília F. Assunção
Maria Cecília F. Assunção
LTLuciana Tovo-Rodrigues
Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues
TMTiago N Munhoz
Tiago N Munhoz
ISIna Santos
Ina Santos
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by persistent symptoms of lack of attention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. The association between nutritional exposures and ADHD has been investigated and some studies have identified adverse effects from higher intake of sugar. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the association between change in sugar consumption between 6 and 11 years of age and incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Pelotas 2004 Birth Cohort Study in Brazil. A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to estimate sugar consumption and the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) was applied to mothers to assess the presence of ADHD. Only children without ADHD at 6 years and with complete information from FFQ and DAWBA at 6 and 11 years were included in the analyses (n = 2924). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Incidence of ADHD between 6 and 11 years was 4.6% (3.6-5.6%) among boys and 1.8% (1.2-2.5%) among girls. Adjusted analyses showed no association between always high sucrose consumption between 6 and 11 years and incidence of ADHD, compared with individuals who always presented low consumption, both among boys (OR = 0.66; 0.21-2.04) and girls (OR = 2.71; 0.24-30.35). Reflect those that are inherent to use of FFQs, such as memory bias and lack of precision in quantifying the diet. The results suggest that there is no association between sucrose consumption between 6 and 11 years of age and incidence of ADHD.