Septimiu Nechifor

Dr. Septimiu Nechifor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2014 in Wireless Personal Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJavier Poncela
Javier Poncela
PVPanagiotis Vlacheas
Panagiotis Vlacheas
RGRaffaele Giaffreda
Raffaele Giaffreda
Suparna DeSuparna De
Suparna De
Massimo VecchioMassimo Vecchio
Massimo Vecchio
PDPanagiotis Demestichas
Panagiotis Demestichas

12 August 2025 in Journal of Grid Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IKIoanna Angeliki Kapetanidou
Ioanna Angeliki Kapetanidou
Nizamis AlexandrosNizamis Alexandros
Nizamis Alexandros
EKEfstathios Karanastasis
Efstathios Karanastasis
GDGabriel Danciu
Gabriel Danciu
CLClara Isabel Valero López
Clara Isabel Valero López
KVKonstantinos Votis
Konstantinos Votis
The evolution from the Edge-Cloud Continuum to the Cognitive Computing Continuum (CCC) has introduced new challenges which necessitate advanced frameworks that integrate cognitive capabilities to enhance interoperability, adaptability, and resource efficiency. Considering insights from ongoing research and initiatives on the cognitive cloud, we identify the core concepts essential for transitioning to the CCC, including cognitive orchestration, distributed AI, and sovereign data management. We then introduce ENACT, a novel framework designed to embrace these concepts aiming to provide cognitive, highly adaptive orchestration to support modern hyper-distributed and data-intensive applications. Furthermore, ENACT employs bespoke mechanisms to enable dynamic continuum modelling and visibility as well as to facilitate application-level automation and adaptability. This paper presents the motivation behind the ENACT approach, reviews the state-of-the-art across its fundamental technological concepts and highlights its key innovations. Overall, it contributes to the formalization of the CCC architectural principles and, ultimately, to the realization of CCC.

20 October 2026 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GDGabriel Danciu
Gabriel Danciu
SJStefan Jarcau
Stefan Jarcau
SNSeptimiu Nechifor
Septimiu Nechifor
AZAndreia-Olga Zaharia
Andreia-Olga Zaharia
Lefteris KoumakisLefteris Koumakis
Lefteris Koumakis
VDVasiliki Danilatou
Vasiliki Danilatou
Background/Objective: Predictive models for cardiovascular disease rely predominantly on electronic health records (EHRs), whereas wearable devices, home monitoring, and patient-reported outcomes offer new opportunities for multimodal risk prediction; however, integrating these heterogeneous sources into a reproducible, clinically usable machine learning workflow remains challenging. This study aimed to develop an end-to-end architecture for explainable multimodal time-series prediction in patients with heart failure (HF), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, and heart transplant (HT) recipients. Methods: The modular architecture harmonizes Health Level Seven Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (HL7 FHIR) and non-FHIR telemonitoring data into a unified event log, which leakage-aware temporal preprocessing converts into patient-day feature matrices. Configurable adverse-event tasks (HF hospitalization, cardiac decompensation, transplant rejection, and mortality) are modeled using gradient-boosted trees or temporal neural networks, with optional probability calibration. Explanations combine SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for tabular models with temporal-perturbation attribution and integrated gradients for sequence models. The pipeline is declaratively configured, tracked with MLflow, and deployable via command-line and web interfaces. It was developed alongside the prospective multicenter RETENTION trial of a telemonitoring-based care pathway and was subsequently applied to data collected within the trial. Results: Applied to the RETENTION cohort, the framework executed the complete workflow, from heterogeneous source data to per-patient-day probability estimates for each prediction task, with feature- and time-level explanations presented as clinician-facing narratives. The cohort served to demonstrate the architecture, not to establish clinical predictive performance or prospective clinical validation. Conclusions: This study provides a reproducible, end-to-end architecture that unifies data harmonization, temporal processing, machine learning orchestration, explainability, and deployment for multimodal clinical prediction. Its modular, disease-agnostic design supports adaptation to other diseases, settings, and data sources, laying a foundation for prospective validation and clinical translation.