Penny Moore

Dr. Penny Moore

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NDNicole A. Doria-Rose
Nicole A. Doria-Rose
CSChaim A. Schramm
Chaim A. Schramm
JGJason Gorman
Jason Gorman
PMPenny Moore
Penny Moore
JBJinal N. Bhiman
Jinal N. Bhiman
JMJohn R. Mascola
John R. Mascola

2 March 2021 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWConstantinos Kurt Wibmer
Constantinos Kurt Wibmer
FAFrances Ayres
Frances Ayres
THTandile Hermanus
Tandile Hermanus
MMMashudu Madzivhandila
Mashudu Madzivhandila
PKPrudence Kgagudi
Prudence Kgagudi
PMPenny Moore
Penny Moore

31 January 2022 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRoanne Keeton
Roanne Keeton
MTMarius Belmondo Tincho
Marius Belmondo Tincho
ANAmkele Ngomti
Amkele Ngomti
RBRichard Baguma
Richard Baguma
NBNtombi Benede
Ntombi Benede
CRCatherine Riou
Catherine Riou
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) has multiple spike protein mutations1,2 that contribute to viral escape from antibody neutralization3–6 and reduce vaccine protection from infection7,8. The extent to which other components of the adaptive response such as T cells may still target Omicron and contribute to protection from severe outcomes is unknown. Here we assessed the ability of T cells to react to Omicron spike protein in participants who were vaccinated with Ad26.CoV2.S or BNT162b2, or unvaccinated convalescent COVID-19 patients (n = 70). Between 70% and 80% of the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response to spike was maintained across study groups. Moreover, the magnitude of Omicron cross-reactive T cells was similar for Beta (B.1.351) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants, despite Omicron harbouring considerably more mutations. In patients who were hospitalized with Omicron infections (n = 19), there were comparable T cell responses to ancestral spike, nucleocapsid and membrane proteins to those in patients hospitalized in previous waves dominated by the ancestral, Beta or Delta variants (n = 49). Thus, despite extensive mutations and reduced susceptibility to neutralizing antibodies of Omicron, the majority of T cell responses induced by vaccination or infection cross-recognize the variant. It remains to be determined whether well-preserved T cell immunity to Omicron contributes to protection from severe COVID-19 and is linked to early clinical observations from South Africa and elsewhere9–12.

1 March 2006 in Journal of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPenny Moore
Penny Moore
ECEmma T. Crooks
Emma T. Crooks
LPLauren Porter
Lauren Porter
PZPing Zhu
Ping Zhu
CCCharmagne S. Cayanan
Charmagne S. Cayanan
JBJames M. Binley
James M. Binley
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) neutralizing antibodies are thought be distinguished from nonneutralizing antibodies by their ability to recognize functional gp120/gp41 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimers. The antibody responses induced by natural HIV-1 infection or by vaccine candidates tested to date consist largely of nonneutralizing antibodies. One might have expected a more vigorous neutralizing response, particularly against virus particles that bear functional trimers. The recent surprising observation that nonneutralizing antibodies can specifically capture HIV-1 may provide a clue relating to this paradox. Specifically, it was suggested that forms of Env, to which nonneutralizing antibodies can bind, exist on virus surfaces. Here, we present evidence that HIV-1 particles bear nonfunctional gp120/gp41 monomers and gp120-depleted gp41 stumps. Using a native electrophoresis band shift assay, we show that antibody-trimer binding predicts neutralization and that the nonfunctional forms of Env may account for virus capture by nonneutralizing antibodies. We hypothesize that these nonfunctional forms of Env on particle surfaces serve to divert the antibody response, helping the virus to evade neutralization.

21 October 2012 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PMPenny Moore
Penny Moore
Elin GrayElin Gray
Elin Gray
CWConstantinos Kurt Wibmer
Constantinos Kurt Wibmer
JBJinal N Bhiman
Jinal N Bhiman
MNMolati Nonyane
Molati Nonyane
LMLynn Morris
Lynn Morris

15 June 2007 in Journal of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Elin GrayElin Gray
Elin Gray
PMPenny Moore
Penny Moore
ICI. A. Choge
I. A. Choge
JDJ. M. Decker
J. M. Decker
FBF. Bibollet-Ruche
F. Bibollet-Ruche
LML. Morris
L. Morris
The study of the evolution and specificities of neutralizing antibodies during the course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection may be important in the discovery of possible targets for vaccine design. In this study, we assessed the autologous and heterologous neutralization responses of 14 HIV-1 subtype C-infected individuals, using envelope clones obtained within the first 2 months postinfection. Our data show that potent but relatively strain-specific neutralizing antibodies develop within 3 to 12 months of HIV-1 infection. The magnitude of this response was associated with shorter V1-to-V5 envelope lengths and fewer glycosylation sites, particularly in the V1-V2 region. Anti-MPER antibodies were detected in 4 of 14 individuals within a year of infection, while antibodies to CD4-induced (CD4i) epitopes developed to high titers in 12 participants, in most cases before the development of autologous neutralizing antibodies. However, neither anti-MPER nor anti-CD4i antibody specificity conferred neutralization breadth. These data provide insights into the kinetics, potency, breadth, and epitope specificity of neutralizing antibody responses in acute HIV-1 subtype C infection.