The utility of nonmetric dental traits in population phenetic studies is well documented. However, consistency in scoring trait expression is a concern due to the subjectivity in scoring quasicontinuous variables with graded scales. The aims of this study are to 1) analyze intraobserver results from an independent scorer and 2) interpret the least precise results. Six hundred individuals (300 of each sex) were scored for 48 dental nonmetric traits using ASUDAS, in one preliminary (100 individuals) and two full observations. Intraobserver precision between scoring sessions yielded adequate results (85% to 100%), with two notable exceptions (UI2 tuberculum dentale and LC distal accessory ridge) and three somewhat problematic cases (UM2 hypocone, UM1 Carabelli's trait, and LM1 anterior fovea). Kendall's τ-b rank correlation coefficients are usually moderate to strong (> 0.3). The results are similar to previously published studies of observer error. Error rates are likely caused by inexperience in observable surface selection and trait/grade definition. ASUDAS requires restraint from scoring teeth that are too worn or modified by caries or chipping. A careful study of trait and grade definitions is strongly encouraged. The key element in achieving high precision rates is experience. Intraobserver (and, if needed, interobserver) error should always be calculated. Overall, ASUDAS is a reliable and useful method, especially if the author's recommendations are followed.

Biological profile estimation is an important task of biological and forensic anthropologists. This includes sex, age, ancestry, and body morphology. In bioarchaeology, the biological profile is useful to analyze paleodemography, secular trends, paleopathology, and genetic processes, for example. Foot dimensions, footprints, and shoeprints can vary according to stature, age, sex, and body weight. The objective is to estimate these parameters in possible laterarii (brickworkers) from five footprints and seven shoeprints found in Roman bricks from Bracara Augusta. Estimation methods were applied to footprint and shoeprint measurements concerning foot length, foot breath, heel breadth, and length from heel to each finger. Three non-adult individuals were aged 1 to 4/5 years and were between 79.7 and 112.5 cm (±7.7 cm) tall. Five adults were likely female individuals, with statures between 144.2 and 159.9 cm. Methods were selected from samples preferably biologically similar to Portuguese people. This pioneer analysis provides biological insight on the Bracara Augusta laterarii and the population inhabiting Northwestern Iberia during Roman times. As a result of taphonomic constraints (cremation, soil acidity, and humidity), coeval osteological materials are hardly recovered, which further increases the relevance of this approach. Future research on methods based on Portuguese foot dimensions is essential.

Dental morphology is a useful resource in archaeology, anthropology and paleontology, due to its genetic determination. Teeth are a material of high durability and stability. This work aims to study the dental morphology and test the Portuguese and European biological affinities of an undocumented mandibular sample, through comparison with global and Iberian samples. The dental traits in 163 mandibles (kept at the Museum of Natural History of the University of Oporto, Portugal) were scored using a standardized methodology (ASUDAS: Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System) and compared to other world-wide and Iberian samples through Principal Components (PCA) and Mean Measure of Divergence analyses. The undertaken quantitative and statistical tests demonstrated the unknown sample to be closer to the Coimbra Portuguese sample in all three comparisons. This suggests this undocumented mandibular sample is possibly of Portuguese 19th/20th century origin.