Murooj Abdulrahim Hariri

Dr. Murooj Abdulrahim Hariri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 November 2023 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Afnan O. Al-ZainAfnan O. Al-Zain
Afnan O. Al-Zain
LBLina Baeesa
Lina Baeesa
EJElaf Jassoma
Elaf Jassoma
MAMaryam A. Alghilan
Maryam A. Alghilan
MHMurooj Abdulrahim Hariri
Murooj Abdulrahim Hariri
EMEliseu Aldrighi Münchow
Eliseu Aldrighi Münchow

12 February 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABArwa Badahdah
Arwa Badahdah
MHMurooj Abdulrahim Hariri
Murooj Abdulrahim Hariri
MAModi Salman Aljohani
Modi Salman Aljohani
LALayan Saad Alshehri
Layan Saad Alshehri
ZNZuhair Natto
Zuhair Natto
Objectives: This review aimed to compare the effectiveness of using a dental water jet (WJ) to manual tooth brushing (MTB) alone or when combined with flossing (MTB + F) in improving plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), and gingival index (GI) in regular and orthodontic patients. Materials and Method: This review was registered with the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022296752). Three reviewers conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1990 and July 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials, excluding those involving peri-implantitis, patients with impaired manual dexterity, or powered brushes. The outcomes of interest (PI, BI, and GI) were measured across short-, intermediate-, and long-term periods. Results: Eighteen RCTs were included in this review. PI: in regular patients, use of a WJ showed no additional improvement over flossing, and the results were inconsistent when compared to MTB alone. For orthodontic patients, use of a WJ provided a slight improvement over flossing in the short term and MTB alone in the intermediate term. BI: use of a WJ demonstrated a slight improvement over flossing and MTB alone in both patient groups at different time points. GI: use of a WJ was comparable to flossing but showed slight benefits over MTB alone in the short term for regular patients and in the intermediate term for orthodontic patients. Conclusions: use of a WJ may provide slight benefits in BI and GI compared to flossing or MTB alone, especially for orthodontic patients. Clinical relevance: incorporating a WJ into the daily oral hygiene routine is recommended due to its potential benefits over brushing alone and its user-friendly alternative to flossing.