Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), granting patients a life expectancy close to that of the normal population and, in a subset of patients, the possibility to discontinue therapy. Nonetheless, for a not negligible minority of patients, TKIs are not able to control CML. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has long been a pivotal therapy for CML. At present, allogeneic HCT is considered an option in CML patients diagnosed or progressing to blast phase (BP), for those in chronic phase (CP) resistant to multiple lines of TKI therapy or for those experiencing severe toxicity, mostly hematologic, under TKIs. Moving from real-world cases, we reviewed the results of allogeneic HCT in the setting of advanced-phase CML or failure of TKIs, with a focus on the progresses in transplant technology that has extended transplant options in elderly CML patients and in those lacking a sibling donor, and on the post-HCT strategies for prevention and treatment of disease relapse.

Background: Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutation accounts for 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases and defines either low- or intermediate-risk AML, depending on FLT3-ITD mutation. New combination regimens (NCRs), adding midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to the 3 + 7 scheme, are commonly used, though there are no data that compare NCRs with intensive induction chemotherapy. Methods: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NCRs and FLAI in NPM1+ AML, we retrospectively analyzed 125 patients treated with FLAI (n = 53) or NCRs (n = 72) at seven Italian Centers. Results: The median age was 61 years and 51/125 (41%) were FLT3-ITD+. The complete remission (CR) rate was 77%, slightly better with NCRs (83% vs. 68%; p = 0.054). NCRs yielded a superior median overall survival (OS) (not reached (NR) vs. 27.3 months; p = 0.002), though the median event-free survival (EFS) was similar (NR vs. 20.5 months; p = 0.07). In low-risk AML, CR was higher in NCRs (94% vs. 72%, p = 0.02), as were median OS (NR vs. 41.6 months; p = 0.0002) and EFS (NR vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.0085). In intermediate-risk AML (FLT3-ITD+), there were no differences in CR (60% vs. 71%; p = 0.5), OS (p = 0.27), or EFS (p = 0.86); only allogeneic transplantation improved OS (NR vs. 13.4 months; p = 0.005), regardless of induction regimen. The safety profile was similar, except for delayed platelet recovery with FLAI (22 vs. 18 days; p = 0.0024) and higher-grade II–IV gastrointestinal toxicity with NCRs (43% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.0066). Conclusions: Our data suggest the superiority of NCRs over FLAI in low-risk patients, while all outcomes were comparable in intermediate-risk patients, a setting in which only transplants positively impacted on survival.