Jiong Gong

Dr. Jiong Gong


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 September 2011 in Journal of Regulatory Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBaomin Dong
Baomin Dong
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong
XZXin Zhao
Xin Zhao

4 May 2015 in Journal of Public Economic Theory
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UDUwe Dulleck
Uwe Dulleck
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong
JLJianpei Li
Jianpei Li
Large infrastructure projects are a major responsibility of urban and regional governments, who usually lack expertise to fully specify the demanded projects. Contractors, typically experts on such projects due to experience with similar projects, advise of the needed design as well as the cost of construction in their bids. Producing the right design is costly. We model such infrastructure projects taking into account their credence goods feature and the costly design effort they require and examine the performance of commonly used contracting methods. We show that when building costs are homogeneous and public information, simultaneous bidding involving shortlisting of two contractors and contingent compensation of both contractors on design efforts outperforms sequential search. If building costs are private information of the contractors and are revealed to them after design cost is sunk, sequential search may be superior to simultaneous bidding.

30 March 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaliyamu Abudureheman
Maliyamu Abudureheman
QJQingzhe Jiang
Qingzhe Jiang
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong
AYAbulaiti Yiming
Abulaiti Yiming
By constructing a translogarithmic stochastic frontier production model, this study explores the total factor productivity (TFP) of service-oriented manufacturing in 30 provinces in China during 2004–2020. We carried out decomposition analysis to understand in greater depth the potential drivers of TFP growth. The results show that the overall TFP of service-oriented manufacturing continuously improved during the sample period; however, the overall growth rate showed a significant slowing trend, and the contribution of TFP growth to output growth is still low. The industrial growth of service-oriented manufacturing is mainly driven by capital input, and the transformation of its growth mode from extensive to intensive has not yet been realized. Furthermore, there exists significant regional and sub-sectoral heterogeneity in the TFP growth of the industry. The decomposition of TFP growth shows that technological progress and technical efficiency are the main sources of TFP growth, but the growth rate of technological progress is declining gradually, and its driving effect on TFP is weakening. The deterioration of both scale and allocation efficiency hinders the improvement of TFP in service-oriented manufacturing, and there is still room for the industry to improve its TFP level by improving scale efficiency and allocation efficiency.

2 April 2014 in Review of Development Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBaomin Dong
Baomin Dong
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong

1 January 2020 in Review of Industrial Organization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RJRan Jing
Ran Jing
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong
FYFang Yi
Fang Yi

21 November 2025 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHShengyan Hu
Shengyan Hu
JGJiong Gong
Jiong Gong
We identified 8 merger cases with remedies in China for a period from the time when the Anti-monopoly Law was enacted in 2008–2018, and about 150 other merger cases corresponding to these 8 cases in their respective industries but approved without remedies. We then use the latter data to construct a counterfactual for the former to compare the factually observed level of competition after the merger decision with that derived from the counterfactual, based on a method called the synthetic control method (SCM). The exercise allows us to assess the remedies’ effectiveness. We find that overall the remedies are effective, but the structural remedies’ effect tends to be more abrupt and pronounced than behavioral remedies.