Background: There are limited data on the impact of right heart failure (RHF) on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We investigated the mortality, in-hospital complications, length of stay, and total hospitalization charges for TAVI admissions, with and without RHF. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample data from 2018 to 2022. The International Classification of Diseases–Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes were used to define the patient cohorts. Propensity score weighting was used to balance patient demographic, hospital-level, and comorbidity data. Results: From 2018 to 2022, there were 383,860 TAVI admissions, among which 1915 (0.50%) had the presence of RHF. Compared to patients without RHF, mortality was higher in patients with RHF (7.57% vs. 1.11%, p < 0.01). Similarly, acute kidney injury (37.10% vs. 8.56%, p < 0.01), respiratory failure (12.79% vs. 1.91%, p < 0.01), and use of mechanical circulatory support (11.48% vs. 0.83%, p < 0.01) was higher in the cohort with RHF. Median length of stay (7 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.01) and hospitalization charges ($257,239 vs. $180,501, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with RHF. Conclusions: In conclusion, we report that RHF is associated with increased mortality risk, complications, and resource utilization in patients undergoing TAVI. Right ventricular function should be a part of the evaluation for TAVI, given significantly elevated risks associated with its presence.

Background: Leadless pacemakers offer a safe and effective alternative pacing strategy. However, limited data are available for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), a population of significant relevance. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we extracted data from all adult patients with ESRD who underwent traditional transvenous or leadless pacemaker implantation between 2016 and 2021. We compared in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission rates, complication rates, and healthcare resource utilization between the two cohorts. Results: A total of 6384 (81.2%) patients were included in the transvenous pacemaker cohort, and 1481(18.8%) patients were included in the leadless pacemaker cohort. In patients with ESRD, leadless pacemaker implantation was linked to higher in-hospital complications when compared to transvenous pacemakers. These included the need for blood transfusion (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.32–2.60, p < 0.01), vascular complications (aOR 3.6, CI 1.40–9.26, p = 0.01), and cardiac complications (aOR 4.12, CI 1.70–9.98, p < 0.01). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates. The median length of stay was longer for leadless pacemaker implantation than transvenous pacemaker implantation (5 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.01). The total hospitalization charges were also higher ($139,826 vs. $93,919, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Although previous studies have demonstrated lower long-term complication rates with leadless pacemakers than transvenous pacemakers, our analysis shows a higher risk of short-term in-hospital complications in ESRD patients, though no differences in in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions.