Eric Anderman

Dr. Eric Anderman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2006 in Annual Review of Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJudith L. Meece
Judith L. Meece
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman
LALynley H. Anderman
Lynley H. Anderman
Over the past 25 years, achievement goal theory has emerged as one of the most prominent theories of achievement motivation. This chapter uses an achievement goal framework to examine the influence of classroom and school environments on students' academic motivation and achievement. Considerable evidence suggests that elementary and secondary students show the most positive motivation and learning patterns when their school settings emphasize mastery, understanding, and improving skills and knowledge. Whereas school environments that are focused on demonstrating high ability and competing for grades can increase the academic performance of some students, research suggests that many young people experience diminished motivation under these conditions. The implications of achievement goal theory for examining the impact of school reform are discussed.

1 July 1997 in Contemporary Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman
CMCarol Midgley
Carol Midgley

1 January 1999 in Contemporary Educational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALynley Hicks Anderman
Lynley Hicks Anderman
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman

1 September 2006 in Educational Psychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMTamera B. Murdock
Tamera B. Murdock
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman
This article uses theoretical concepts from self-efficacy theory, goal theory, expectancy value, and intrinsic motivation theory as a way to organize the vast and largely atheoretical literature on academic cheating. Specifically, it draws on 3 particular questions that students encounter when deciding whether to cheat: (a) What is my purpose?, (b) Can I do this task?, and (c) What are the costs associated with cheating? This article reviews both experimental and nonexperimental evidence related to each of these questions and offers suggestions for future research and instructional practices that will lessen the likelihood of cheating.

1 October 1994 in Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman
AYAllison J. Young
Allison J. Young

1 February 2013 in American Psychologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dorothy L. EspelageDorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage
EAEric Anderman
Eric Anderman
VBVeda Evanell Brown
Veda Evanell Brown
AJAbraham Jones
Abraham Jones
KLKathleen Lynne Lane
Kathleen Lynne Lane
CRCecil R. Reynolds
Cecil R. Reynolds
Violence directed against K-12 teachers is a serious problem that demands the immediate attention of researchers, providers of teacher pre-service and in-service training, school administrators, community leaders, and policymakers. Surprisingly, little research has been conducted on this growing problem despite the broad impact teacher victimization can have on schooling, recruitment, and retention of highly effective teachers and on student academic and behavioral outcomes. Psychologists should play a leadership role in mitigating school violence, including violence directed toward teachers. There is a need for psychologists to conduct research accurately assessing the types and scope of violence that teachers experience; to comprehensively evaluate the individual, classroom, school, community, institutional, and cultural contextual factors that might predict and/or explain types of teacher violence; and to examine the effectiveness and sustainability of classroom, school, and district-wide prevention and intervention strategies that target teacher violence in school systems. Collectively, the work of psychologists in this area could have a substantial impact on schooling, teacher experience and retention, and overall student performance.