From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. How and when to escalate standard sepsis therapy to a reserve antimicrobial agent, is a recurrent dilemma. The study objective was to develop decision strategies for empiric sepsis therapy based on local microbiological and clinical data, and estimate the number needed to treat with a carbapenem to avoid mismatch of empiric therapy in one patient (NNTC). We performed a nested case control study in patients (> 18 years) with Gram-negative bacteremia in 2013–2016. Cases were defined as patients with Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro resistance to the combination 2nd generation cephalosporin AND aminoglycoside (C-2GC + AG). Control patients had Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro susceptibility to cefuroxime AND/OR gentamicin, 1:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed for demographic and clinical predictors of resistance. The adequacy rates of empiric therapy and the NNTC were estimated for different strategies. The cohort consisted of 486 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in 450 patients. Median age was 66 years (IQR 56–74). In vitro resistance to C-2GC + AG was present in 44 patients (8.8%). Independent predictors for resistance to empiric sepsis therapy were hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 4.09, 95%CI 1.43–11.62, p < 0.01), previously cultured drug resistant pathogen (adjusted OR 3.72. 95%CI 1.72–8.03, p < 0.01) and antibiotic therapy during the preceding 2 months (adjusted OR 12.5 4.08–38.48, p < 0.01). With risk-based strategies, an adequacy rate of empiric therapy of 95.2–99.3% could be achieved. Compared to treating all patients with a carbapenem, the NNTC could be reduced by 82.8% (95%CI 78.5–87.5%) using the targeted approaches. A risk-based approach in empiric sepsis therapy has the potential to better target the use of reserve antimicrobial agents aimed at multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A structured evaluation of the expected antimicrobial consumption and antibiotic adequacy rates is essential to be able to weigh the costs and benefits of potential antibiotic strategies and select the most appropriate approach.

This Critical Appraisal aims to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications used in organ donors after euthanasia (ODE) and their impact on abdominal organ quality. With the legalization of ODE, the donor pool has expanded, but it has introduced complexities regarding organ quality. This study evaluates existing euthanasia protocols in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, and Canada, focusing on differences in the medication types and dosages. Additionally, a literature review assessed the potential hepatotoxic effects of high-dose medications like thiopental, propofol, and non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. High doses of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, particularly rocuronium, are associated with hepatotoxic effects in vitro. Furthermore, thiopental doses exceeding 750 mg significantly increase the risk of liver dysfunction. Recent findings also indicate that high-dose propofol and lidocaine can slightly prolong the time to death, which is crucial for optimizing organ viability in ODE. This study highlights the need to optimize organ donation procedures after euthanasia. Further research is needed to achieve this balance, maintaining the integrity and ethical standards of the euthanasia process while enhancing the outcomes of organ donation.