Ronald Bartels

Prof. Dr. Ronald Bartels


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrew I R Maas
Andrew I R Maas
DMDavid K Menon
David K Menon
PAP David Adelson
P David Adelson
NANada Andelic
Nada Andelic
MBMichael J Bell
Michael J Bell
FZFabrizio Zumbo
Fabrizio Zumbo

1 October 2019 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ESEwout W Steyerberg
Ewout W Steyerberg
EWEveline Wiegers
Eveline Wiegers
CSCharlie Sewalt
Charlie Sewalt
ABAndras Buki
Andras Buki
GCGiuseppe Citerio
Giuseppe Citerio
TZTommaso Zoerle
Tommaso Zoerle
The burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a large public health and societal problem, but the characteristics of patients and their care pathways in Europe are poorly understood. We aimed to characterise patient case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes of TBI. CENTER-TBI is a Europe-based, observational cohort study, consisting of a core study and a registry. Inclusion criteria for the core study were a clinical diagnosis of TBI, presentation fewer than 24 h after injury, and an indication for CT. Patients were differentiated by care pathway and assigned to the emergency room (ER) stratum (patients who were discharged from an emergency room), admission stratum (patients who were admitted to a hospital ward), or intensive care unit (ICU) stratum (patients who were admitted to the ICU). Neuroimages and biospecimens were stored in repositories and outcome was assessed at 6 months after injury. We used the IMPACT core model for estimating the expected mortality and proportion with unfavourable Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) outcomes in patients with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score ≤12). The core study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02210221, and with Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582). Data from 4509 patients from 18 countries, collected between Dec 9, 2014, and Dec 17, 2017, were analysed in the core study and from 22 782 patients in the registry. In the core study, 848 (19%) patients were in the ER stratum, 1523 (34%) in the admission stratum, and 2138 (47%) in the ICU stratum. In the ICU stratum, 720 (36%) patients had mild TBI (GCS score 13-15). Compared with the core cohort, the registry had a higher proportion of patients in the ER (9839 [43%]) and admission (8571 [38%]) strata, with more than 95% of patients classified as having mild TBI. Patients in the core study were older than those in previous studies (median age 50 years [IQR 30-66], 1254 [28%] aged >65 years), 462 (11%) had serious comorbidities, 772 (18%) were taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication, and alcohol was contributory in 1054 (25%) TBIs. MRI and blood biomarker measurement enhanced characterisation of injury severity and type. Substantial inter-country differences existed in care pathways and practice. Incomplete recovery at 6 months (GOSE <8) was found in 207 (30%) patients in the ER stratum, 665 (53%) in the admission stratum, and 1547 (84%) in the ICU stratum. Among patients with moderate-to-severe TBI in the ICU stratum, 623 (55%) patients had unfavourable outcome at 6 months (GOSE <5), similar to the proportion predicted by the IMPACT prognostic model (observed to expected ratio 1·06 [95% CI 0·97-1·14]), but mortality was lower than expected (0·70 [0·62-0·76]). Patients with TBI who presented to European centres in the core study were older than were those in previous observational studies and often had comorbidities. Overall, most patients presented with mild TBI. The incomplete recovery of many patients should motivate precision medicine research and the identification of best practices to improve these outcomes. European Union 7th Framework Programme, the Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, OneMind, and Integra LifeSciences Corporation.

24 June 2016 in European Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LTLindsay Tetreault
Lindsay Tetreault
BKBranko Kopjar
Branko Kopjar
Aria NouriAria Nouri
Aria Nouri
PAPaul Arnold
Paul Arnold
GBGiuseppe Barbagallo
Giuseppe Barbagallo
Michael FehlingsMichael Fehlings
Michael Fehlings

1 September 2015 in Spine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Michael FehlingsMichael Fehlings
Michael Fehlings
AIAhmed Ibrahim
Ahmed Ibrahim
LTLindsay Bsc Tetreault
Lindsay Bsc Tetreault
VAVincenzo Albanese
Vincenzo Albanese
MAManuel Alvarado
Manuel Alvarado
BKBranko Kopjar
Branko Kopjar
Study Design. Prospective, multicenter international cohort. Objective. To evaluate outcomes of surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) at a global level. Summary of Background Data. CSM is a degenerative spine disease and the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. Surgery is increasingly recommended as the preferred treatment strategy for CSM to improve neurological and functional status and quality of life. The outcomes of surgical intervention for CSM have never been evaluated at an international level. Methods. Between October 2007 and January 2011, 479 symptomatic patients with image evidence of CSM were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter AOSpine CSM-International study from 16 global sites. Preoperative and postoperative clinical status, functional impairment, and quality of life were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment Scale, Nurick Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Short-Form-36v2. Preoperative and 12- and 24-month postoperative outcomes were compared using mixed-model analysis of covariance for repeated measurements. Results. The study cohort consisted of 310 males and 169 females, with a mean age of 56.37 ± 11.91 years. There were significant differences in age, etiology, and surgical approaches between the regions. At 24 months postoperatively, the mean modified Japanese Orthopaedic Assessment Scale score improved from 12.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.24–12.76) to 14.90 (95% CI, 14.64–15.16); the Neck Disability Index improved from 36.38 (95% CI, 34.33–38.43) to 23.20 (95% CI, 21.24–25.15); and the SF36v2 Physical Component Score and Mental Composite Score improved from 34.28 (95% CI, 33.46–35.10) to 40.76 (95% CI, 39.71–41.81) and 39.45 (95% CI, 38.25–40.64) to 46.24 (95% CI, 44.94–47.55), respectively. The rate of neurological complications was 3.13%. Conclusion. Surgical decompression for CSM is safe and results in improved functional status and quality of life in patients around the world, irrespective of differences in medical systems and sociocultural determinants of health. Level of Evidence: 3

1 March 2005 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRonald Bartels
Ronald Bartels
WVWim I.M. Verhagen
Wim I.M. Verhagen
GWGert Jan van der Wilt
Gert Jan van der Wilt
JMJan Meulstee
Jan Meulstee
LRLeo G.M. van Rossum
Leo G.M. van Rossum
JGJ André Grotenhuis
J André Grotenhuis
OBJECTIVE:. The main objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of participants treated by simple decompression (SD) of the ulnar nerv

8 July 2009 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMark P. Arts
Mark P. Arts
RBRonald Brand
Ronald Brand
MMM. Elske van den Akker-van Marle
M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle
BKBart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes
RBRonald Bartels
Ronald Bartels
WPWilco C. Peul
Wilco C. Peul
Sciatica or lumbosacral radicular syndrome affects millions of individuals worldwide and is typically caused by disk herniation.1 The natural course is usually favorable. Surgery is offered to patients with persistent pain that is refractory to conservative treatment.2-4 Since the first successful lumbar disk operation, described by Mixter and Barr5 in 1934, a variety of less invasive techniques have been developed. With the introduction of the microscope, the original laminectomy was refined into open microdiskectomy, which is now the most common procedure.6-8