Chloe Hayes

Ms. Chloe Hayes


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2025 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMolly Whitbread
Molly Whitbread
CHChloe Hayes
Chloe Hayes
SPSanjana Prabhakar
Sanjana Prabhakar
Rebecca UpsherRebecca Upsher
Rebecca Upsher
This study aimed to understand university staff’s perspectives and approaches regarding students’ use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in an academic setting. Currently, there is a lack of social media analyses exploring this area. For the present study, a qualitative content analysis was conducted on posts about ChatGPT shared via X (formerly Twitter). This enabled a sample of n = 194 perspectives to be captured. Three main themes were generated: (1) perceptions of GenAI’s impact on higher education and skepticism towards its management; (2) GenAI in assessment: prevention and detection approaches; and (3) future-focused approaches to GenAI-enhanced learning and assessment. Some university staff see GenAI as a threat to their profession and have stressed the need for university guidance. Staff discussed both the positive and negative impacts of GenAI on student learning. Some staff want to prevent the use of GenAI in assessments, whilst others embrace the tool. These findings can inform university guidance on the use of GenAI in the future.