Frédéric Auber

Prof. Dr. Frédéric Auber

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 May 2021 in Membranes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMathilde FENELON
Mathilde FENELON
SCSylvain Catros
Sylvain Catros
CMChristophe Meyer
Christophe Meyer
JFJean-Christophe Fricain
Jean-Christophe Fricain
LOLaurent Obert
Laurent Obert
Florelle GindrauxFlorelle Gindraux
Florelle Gindraux
An important component of tissue engineering (TE) is the supporting matrix upon which cells and tissues grow, also known as the scaffold. Scaffolds must easily integrate with host tissue and provide an excellent environment for cell growth and differentiation. Human amniotic membrane (hAM) is considered as a surgical waste without ethical issue, so it is a highly abundant, cost-effective, and readily available biomaterial. It has biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, adequate mechanical properties (permeability, stability, elasticity, flexibility, resorbability), and good cell adhesion. It exerts anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antimutagenic properties and pain-relieving effects. It is also a source of growth factors, cytokines, and hAM cells with stem cell properties. This important source for scaffolding material has been widely studied and used in various areas of tissue repair: corneal repair, chronic wound treatment, genital reconstruction, tendon repair, microvascular reconstruction, nerve repair, and intraoral reconstruction. Depending on the targeted application, hAM has been used as a simple scaffold or seeded with various types of cells that are able to grow and differentiate. Thus, this natural biomaterial offers a wide range of applications in TE applications. Here, we review hAM properties as a biocompatible and degradable scaffold. Its use strategies (i.e., alone or combined with cells, cell seeding) and its degradation rate are also presented.

1 April 2018 in Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFrançois Bastard
François Bastard
ABArnaud Bonnard
Arnaud Bonnard
VRVéronique Rousseau
Véronique Rousseau
TGThomas Gelas
Thomas Gelas
LMLaurent Michaud
Laurent Michaud
GPGuillaume Podevin
Guillaume Podevin

1 December 2020 in Journal of Pediatric Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYann Chaussy
Yann Chaussy
LVLorédane Vieille
Lorédane Vieille
ELElise Lacroix
Elise Lacroix
MLMarion Lenoir
Marion Lenoir
FMFlorent Marie
Florent Marie
FAFrédéric Auber
Frédéric Auber

1 January 2021 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BPBruno Perez
Bruno Perez
CLChristophe Lang
Christophe Lang
JHJulien Henriet
Julien Henriet
LPLaurent Philippe
Laurent Philippe
FAFrédéric Auber
Frédéric Auber

1 April 2015 in Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKArnaud Fotso Kamdem
Arnaud Fotso Kamdem
VNVirginie Nerich
Virginie Nerich
FAFrédéric Auber
Frédéric Auber
PJPrévost Jantchou
Prévost Jantchou
FEFiona Ecarnot
Fiona Ecarnot
MWMarie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi
Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi

5 February 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMoustafa Fayad
Moustafa Fayad
Réda YAHIAOUIRéda YAHIAOUI
Réda YAHIAOUI
FAFrédéric Auber
Frédéric Auber
HPHervé Pidoux
Hervé Pidoux
OHOlivier Hild
Olivier Hild
YCYann Chaussy
Yann Chaussy
Objective: This study provides a comprehensive global overview of surgical instrument traceability systems and accentuates their growing importance in healthcare. Background: Surgical instruments pose risks to patient safety, economic costs, logistical challenges, and environmental impact. The increasing focus on instrument traceability reflects its potential to address these issues. Methods: We performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines, analyzing articles from 2000 to 2023 across five digital libraries (PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE, ACM, Google Scholar). Our review concentrated on traceability systems’ lifecycle for reusable and sterile surgical instruments. Results: Out of 7189 articles retrieved, 22 were selected for evaluation, and only 6 were considered relevant after a thorough examination. These studies mainly deployed Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology. They enhance patient safety, reduce environmental impact, improve economic efficiency, and optimize logistics. Additionally, these systems encourage more responsible surgical practices. Conclusions: Our study underscores the limited applied research in this field and discusses system architectures and performance metrics. It proposes future research directions, including the development of public databases, integration of automation, and investment in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision to improve traceability and risk analysis.