The design and evaluation of structures subjected to blast loads has increased steadily since the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. While shock tube testing has filled some of the data gap by replicating blast waves in a controlled fashion, there is only scant field explosion data that is easily accessible for the structural engineering community for hypothesis testing or model validation. This paper summarizes experimental design, pre-test sensor verification, and data collection from 10 reinforced concrete slabs subjected to field explosions using a modest budget. The experimental record contains pressure, displacement, and acceleration measurements of each slab except in a few cases where the sensors have failed. The data is archived at George Mason Dataverse. Following detailed description of the experimental record for each slab, an example is provided in which the data can be utilized for finite element model verification.

Since the last century, concrete has been used to protect structures against intentional or accidental detonation of explosives. Recently, as concerns about terrorist activities and accidents in plants using explosives increase worldwide, the study of the behaviour of this type of material and any civil or military structure under the influence of explosions has increased. Among the lethal effects of explosive devices, which cause greater loads in structural elements is the airblast effect. For this reason, this paper presents a series of airblast finite element (FEM) simulations developed in Abaqus/Explicit®. To validate the computational method, such simulations are geometrically and structurally kept similar to full-scale tests conducted in a blast test area of the Science and Technology Aerospace Department (Brazilian Air Force). Both simulations and tests consisted of seven reinforced concrete slabs with compressive strengths of about 40 to 60 MPa, variable steel reinforcement areas, slab dimensions measuring 1×1 m, and subjected to 2.7 kg of non-confined plastic bonded explosive. The results demonstrated that FEM simulations can predict the rupture of the tested slabs and how the effect occurs, showing a valid method to investigating the response of RC slabs when compared to expensive field tests. Differences in displacements were observed between the results of FEM simulations and blast field tests, mainly caused by the sensitivity of the case studied, limits of computational capacity, and intrinsic variations in the materials and sensors used in the field tests. However, these differences showed an order of magnitude compatible with the safety coefficients used with RC, demonstrating that the method can be used for the design of RC slabs under the effect of airblast.

Structural research teams face significant challenges when conducting studies with explosives, including the costs and inherent risks associated with field detonation tests. This study presents a replicable method for loading spherical and bare TNT-based cast explosive charges, offering reduced costs and minimal risks. Over eighty TNT and Composition B charges (comprising 60% RDX, 39% TNT, and 1% wax) were prepared using spherical molds made of thin aluminum, which are low-cost, off-the-shelf solutions. The charges were bare, meaning they lacked any casing, as the molds were designed to be easily removed after casting. The resulting charges were safer due to their smaller dimensions and the absence of hazardous metallic debris. Composition B charges demonstrated promising results, with their performance characterized through blast and thermochemical experiments. Comprehensive data are provided for Composition B charges, including TNT equivalence, pressures, velocity of detonation, DSC/TGA curves at four different heating rates, activation energy, peak decomposition temperatures, X-ray analysis, and statistics on masses and densities. A comparison between detonation and deflagration processes, captured in high-speed footage, is also presented. This explosive characterization is crucial for structural teams to precisely understand the blast loads produced, ensuring a clear and accurate knowledge of the forces acting on structures.

In recent years, a series of studies have examined the effects of blast loads on structures and proposed new materials to enhance or retrofit the resistance of conventional materials, such as steel or concrete. Polymeric materials, including foams and elastomers, play a significant role in this field due to their low density and favorable mechanical properties under dynamic loads. This study investigates the use of polyurethane elastomer to improve the mechanical properties of 2 mm A36 steel sheets. The efficiency of this material in steel structures has not yet been studied in the scientific literature through blast tests. A total of 18 near-field blast tests were conducted at standoff distances of 300 mm and 500 mm. The explosive charges consisted of 334 g of bare Composition B in a spherical shape. The steel sheets were fixed to rigid supports and exposed to the blast either bare or covered with different layers of commercial Shore A 60 or 90 polyurethane elastomer, with thicknesses varying from 2 to 6 mm. The maximum displacement of the steel sheets was measured using a high-speed camera and the results were compared. The elastomer retrofitted sheets exhibited a reduction in maximum displacement ranging from 5% to 20% when compared to the sheet without the elastomer.

Blast mitigation of structures is an important research topic due to increasing intentional and accidental human-induced threats and hazards. This research area is essential to building capabilities in sustaining structural protection, site planning, protective design efficiency, occupant safety, and response and recovery plans. This paper investigates experimental tests and finite element analysis (FEM) of thin A36 steel sheets subjected to blast. Six field blast tests were performed at standoff distances of 300 mm and 500 mm. The explosive charges comprised 334 g of bare Composition B, and the steel sheets were 2 mm thick. The experimental results, derived from the analysis of high-speed camera recordings of the blast events, were compared with FEM simulations conducted using Abaqus^®/Explicit version 6.10. Three constitutive material models were considered in these simulations. First, the FEM simulation results were compared with experimental results. It was shown that the FEM analysis provided reliable results and was proven to be robust and cost-effective. Second, an extensive set of 460 additional numerical simulations was carried out as a parametric study involving varying standoff distances and steel sheet thicknesses. The results and methodologies presented in this paper offer valuable and original insights for engineers and researchers aiming to predict damage to steel structures during real detonation events and to design blast-resistant structures.

Investigating the effects of high explosives on metallic structures is important for the development of new protective systems and for assessing the load-bearing capacity of existing structures. To achieve these objectives, a series of detonation tests using TNT charges will be conducted to evaluate the resulting effects on 2 mm-thick A36 structural steel sheets. However, before performing the experimental tests, it is essential to accurately predict the effects of the detonations on the steel sheets in order to ensure test safety and verify that the selected explosive configurations produce the intended structural response. To accomplish this, a series of finite element method (FEM) simulations was carried out using Abaqus®, considering different expected standoff distances. The numerical results indicated that the steel sheets experienced permanent deformations exceeding the material's elastic limit without reaching failure. These findings satisfy the objectives of the study, since either negligible or catastrophic deformations would prevent the proper measurement and evaluation of blast effects on the structural elements during the experimental campaign.