This article presents a framework to determine driving style and design a driver steering model considering driver characteristics. First, principal component analysis (PCA) and $K$ -means clustering are utilized to classify 30 participants into cautious, moderate, and aggressive drivers. Subsequently, a generic steering model is established based on the model predictive control method. Thereafter, the maximum lateral acceleration is extracted as a crucial indicator to represent driver characteristics, and it is calibrated through probabilistic models using the dataset, which consists of the classified drivers. Besides, point estimation model and interval estimation model are leveraged to determine driving style and adjust constraints in the stochastic programming-based steering model. Finally, simulation experiments present the variations of actual output trajectories between the aggressive drivers and the cautious drivers.

Perception systems play a crucial role in autonomous driving by reading the sensory data and providing meaningful interpretation of the operating environment for decision-making and planning. Guaranteeing a safe perception performance is the foundation for high-level autonomy, so that we can hand over the driving and monitoring tasks to the machine with ease. With the motivation of improving the perception systems’ safety, this survey analyzes and reviews the current achievements of safety-related standards and definitions, sensory modeling, and metrics for perception tasks in autonomous driving applications. Furthermore, it covers the generic categorization of potential failures and causal analysis in perception tasks, correlates the effect with the scenario modelling choices, and highlights major triumphs and noted limitations encountered by current research efforts. The new safety challenges laid out by the information exchange stage of the connected autonomous vehicle application have also been summarized. The open research questions and future directions are outlined to welcome researchers and practitioners to this exciting domain.

Inappropriate speed in negotiating curves is the primary cause of rollovers and sideslips. In this study, the authors proposed an improved curve speed model considering driving styles, as well as vehicle and road factors. On the basis of a vehicle–road interaction model, the driver behaviour factor was introduced to quantify driving styles of curve speed choices. Firstly, the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was utilised to classify the driving styles of 30 professional drivers into three different types (i.e. cautious, moderate and aggressive). Secondly, the classification results using fuzzy synthetic evaluation were compared to and verified with the K ‐means clustering method resulting over 60% the similarities. Finally, the proposed curve speed model was built and compared with four existing models. The authors’ model has the following promising advantages: (i) it reflects the speed preferences of three different types of drivers on the premise of driving safety on curves; and (ii) it shows a stationary speed transition when the road adhesion coefficient exceeds 0.8, which indicates that rollover, instead of sideslip, becomes the primary cause for lateral instability crashes on curves. Therefore, this proposed curve speed model could be applied in a curve speed warning system to improve both driving safety and comfort.

The task of making lane change decisions for autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic is intricate and challenging due to the uncertainty of surrounding vehicles. The uncertainty exists in terms of the diverse social driving preferences and unpredictable driving behavior of human drivers. To address these challenges, the decision-making process for changing lanes is represented as an incomplete information game, where the driver characteristics of surrounding vehicles are unknown during the interaction. To eliminate the uncertainty of the driving environment, the concept of driver aggressiveness is proposed to quantify the social driving preferences based on the Risk-Response (R-R) diagram in an explainable manner. Then the predicted trajectory is utilized to calculate the driving risks using Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) that is trained by the naturalistic driving data in the interactive lane change scenarios extracted from the highD dataset. To make the simulation environment more diverse and realistic, the data-driven motion model social Intelligent Driver Model (SIDM) is constructed based on car-following data obtained from cut-in scenarios in the highD dataset. The simulations are conducted by setting up the environment vehicles equipped with SIDM model with diverse social driving preferences. The findings indicate that the proposed decision-making model can recognize the category of surrounding vehicles, and in realistic interactive driving scenarios, it can produce adaptive and human-like driving decisions.