Background/Objectives: Postpartum depression seriously affects the safety and health of mothers and children. Online cognitive behavioral therapy is considered to be a promising treatment; however, whether it is effective at improving postpartum depression is inconsistent and the specific intervention measures are not the same. The objectives of this study were to comprehensively review the effects of online cognitive behavioral therapy on postpartum depression and further explore the specific intervention measures. Methods: A literature search was conducted using thirteen electronic databases and two clinical trial registries from the establishment of the databases to 31 December 2023. The study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers. The latest Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was selected to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the online GRADEpro tool. Eighteen studies involving 3689 women were included. Results: The results showed that online cognitive behavioral therapy was effective at improving postpartum depression. A subgroup analysis showed that the duration of online cognitive behavioral therapy with total intervention was 9 weeks and above, the total intervention number was 12 times or fewer, and using a website or Zoom online conference room as the intervention platform could more significantly improve postpartum depression. In particular, providing professional guidance could be more effective. Conclusions: In summary, online cognitive behavioral therapy was effective for postpartum depression. Furthermore, this study found out how specific intervention measures of online cognitive behavioral therapy could be more effective. Finally, nurses can participate in the therapy to improve access to evidence-based treatment.

Background: While combined diet and physical activity interventions are recommended, evidence specific to low-risk pregnant women remains limited. As responses to combined interventions may vary by pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal health status and pregnancy outcomes, targeted evaluation in low-risk pregnant women is needed. Inconsistencies across studies, along with the lack of a comprehensive synthesis of both effects and intervention components, further limit their implementation. Objective: Our aims were to assess the effects of combined diet and physical activity interventions on gestational weight gain among low-risk women and to systematically characterize the intervention components. Design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Cochrane Handbook guidelines and PRISMA 2020. Methods: Eight databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 16 March 2026. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Intervention components were coded using the TIDieR checklist. The quality of included studies was assessed using the updated Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADEpro online tool. Results: A total of 10 studies involving 3977 pregnant women were included. Combined diet and physical activity interventions significantly reduced total gestational weight gain (GWG) (MD = −0.78 kg, 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.44, p < 0.00001) and the risk of excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG) (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49–0.81, p = 0.0003). Additionally, individually delivered physical activity components and those implemented in healthcare facilities appeared to be associated with lower total GWG (MD = −0.76 kg, 95% CI: −0.98 to −0.53, p < 0.00001). For EGWG, lower risk was observed in interventions using combined face-to-face and remote formats (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41–0.72, p < 0.0001) and moderate frequency (diet: OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51–0.81, p = 0.0002, physical activity: OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52–0.83, p = 0.0004). Conclusions: Combined diet and physical activity interventions were associated with reduced total GWG and lower EGWG risk in low-risk pregnant women. Intervention characteristics, such as individual delivery formats, combined face-to-face and remote formats, moderate frequency and implementation in healthcare facilities, may be related to intervention effectiveness. Registration number: CRD420251013116 (PROSPERO).

Objective: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of racket sport-related injury research, focusing on research progress, collaboration networks, hotspots, and thematic evolution. Drawing on the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and PubMed, the analysis covers 1,837 publications from 76 countries spanning from 2000 to 2025. Methods: This study employed bibliometric methods combined with statistical analysis. Using CiteSpace 6.4.R1, VOSviewer 1.6.20, SCImago Graphica 1.0.53, and SPSS 26.0, quantitative and visual analyses were conducted on publication trends, geographical distribution, institutional distribution, country/region cooperation networks, core authors, journal distribution, keyword co-occurrences, research hotspots, the evolution of research topics, and highly cited papers. These analyses were supplemented by a correlation analysis, a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, and a cluster analysis. Results: The global publication volume of racket sport-related injury research exhibited a two-stage growth trend (fluctuating growth and rapid growth), with a significant acceleration after 2020. Geographically, the research was primarily concentrated in Europe, North America, and East Asia, with the United States (527 articles), China (199 articles), and the United Kingdom (152 articles) ranking as the top three in terms of publication quantity. The statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between national 2025 GDP per capita and publication volume ( ρ = 0.538, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.351, 0.684]). Core research institutions were dominated by sports universities, sports medicine hospitals, and orthopedic research centers, with the Mayo Clinic (USA), University of Liege (Belgium), and Harvard University (USA) as the leading institutions. The international cooperation network was relatively sparse, with merely 15.1% of publications involving cross-national collaboration. The cluster analysis classified research hotspots into 13 core clusters, which were further aggregated into the following six interconnected research domains: epidemiological characteristics and injury prevention, sport-specific injury manifestations, chronic overuse injuries, acute traumatic injuries, imaging-based injury diagnosis, and rehabilitation of sports injuries. The dynamic evolution of research trends was classified into the following three phases: epidemiological investigation and traditional treatment, biomechanical mechanisms and standardized intervention, and intelligent technology and precision prevention. The Brit J Sport Med was a core journal source in the field. There were extremely significant differences in article count across three research themes ( χ ² = 354.55, p < 0.001, Cramér's V = 0.54), with rehabilitation research differing significantly from both sport injury and injury prevention research. Conclusions: To move this field forward, scholars should foster transnational interdisciplinary collaboration, expand comparative research across populations and racket sports, implement standardized injury-surveillance and load-management frameworks, and develop generalizable, systematic prevention-rehabilitation systems for racket sport participants.