James G. Wilson

Prof. James G. Wilson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

51Years (1976-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1980 in Helgoland Marine Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DTD. L. Tomlinson
D. L. Tomlinson
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson
CHC. R. Harris
C. R. Harris
DJD. W. Jeffrey
D. W. Jeffrey

1 November 2013 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABA. Basset
A. Basset
MEMichael Elliott
Michael Elliott
RWR.J. West
R.J. West
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson

1 December 2002 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson

1 March 2009 in Cytotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BQBrian Quinn
Brian Quinn
MCMark J. Costello
Mark J. Costello
GDGermaine Dorange
Germaine Dorange
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson
CMCarmel Mothersill
Carmel Mothersill

1 April 1998 in Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSteffen Roth
Steffen Roth
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson

1 March 1994 in Estuaries
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJames G. Wilson
James G. Wilson
Estuarine organisms can be considered three ways as bioindicators—first, as indicators of a defined set of environmental conditions, second, as indicators of contaminant loads on the system, and third, as indicators of the overall health of the system. By their very nature, estuarine organisms are eurytolerant and this, along with the various stratagems that have evolved to cope with the problems of life in estuaries results in a confusing picture for the estuarine manager. The recommended bioindicators for estuarine conditions are plankton; for contaminant loads, a range of species with different feeding types; and for system status, a eurytolerant species, such as the musselMytilus edulis for laboratory monitoring or a “target” species such as the clamMacoma balthica for field monitoring. However, it would be unwise to rely on a single indicator, and the recommendation is that the final choice, and preferably choices, be tailored to the desired goal.