William David Dotson

Dr. William David Dotson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2009 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSteven M. Teutsch
Steven M. Teutsch
LBLinda A. Bradley
Linda A. Bradley
GPGlenn E. Palomaki
Glenn E. Palomaki
JHJames E. Haddow
James E. Haddow
MPMargaret Piper
Margaret Piper
ABAlfred O. Berg
Alfred O. Berg

18 September 2020 in European Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSwetha Srinivasan
Swetha Srinivasan
NWNae Yeon Won
Nae Yeon Won
WDWilliam David Dotson
William David Dotson
SWSarah T. Wright
Sarah T. Wright
MRMegan Roberts
Megan Roberts

1 January 2009 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGlenn E. Palomaki
Glenn E. Palomaki
LBLinda A. Bradley
Linda A. Bradley
Michael P DouglasMichael P Douglas
Michael P Douglas
KKKatherine Kolor
Katherine Kolor
WDWilliam David Dotson
William David Dotson

1 April 2010 in Genetics in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJeffrey Botkin
Jeffrey Botkin
STSteven M. Teutsch
Steven M. Teutsch
CKCelia I. Kaye
Celia I. Kaye
MHMaxine Hayes
Maxine Hayes
JHJames E. Haddow
James E. Haddow
WDWilliam David Dotson
William David Dotson

14 October 2019 in JNCI Cancer Spectrum
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSteffie K Naber
Steffie K Naber
SKSuman Kundu
Suman Kundu
KKKaren M Kuntz
Karen M Kuntz
WDWilliam David Dotson
William David Dotson
MWMarc Williams
Marc Williams
IVIris Lansdorp Vogelaar
Iris Lansdorp Vogelaar
Background: Although uniform colonoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality, risk-based screening may be more efficient. We investigated whether CRC screening based on polygenic risk is a cost-effective alternative to current uniform screening, and if not, under what conditions it would be.Methods: The MISCAN-Colon model was used to simulate a hypothetical cohort of US 40-year-olds. Uniform screening was modeled as colonoscopy screening at ages 50, 60, and 70 years. For risk-stratified screening, individuals underwent polygenic testing with current and potential future discriminatory performance (area under the receiver-operating curve [AUC] of 0.60 and 0.65–0.80, respectively). Polygenic testing results were used to create risk groups, for which colonoscopy screening was optimized by varying the start age (40–60 years), end age (70–85 years), and interval (1–20 years).Results: With current discriminatory performance, optimal screening ranged from once-only colonoscopy at age 60 years for the lowest-risk group to six colonoscopies at ages 40–80 years for the highest-risk group. While maintaining the same health benefits, risk-stratified screening increased costs by $59 per person. Risk-stratified screening could become cost-effective if the AUC value would increase beyond 0.65, the price per polygenic test would drop to less than $141, or risk-stratified screening would lead to a 5% increase in screening participation.Conclusions: Currently, CRC screening based on polygenic risk is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with uniform screening. This is expected to change with a greater than 0.05 increase in AUC value, a greater than 30% reduction in polygenic testing costs, or a greater than 5% increase in adherence with screening.

1 February 2001 in Journal of Bacteriology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKevin V. Shianna
Kevin V. Shianna
WDWilliam David Dotson
William David Dotson
STShirley Tove
Shirley Tove
LPLeo W. Parks
Leo W. Parks
Saccharomyces cerevisiae normally will not take up sterols from the environment under aerobic conditions. A specific mutant, upc2 - 1 , of the predicted transcriptional activator UPC2 (YDR213w) has been recognized as a strain that allows a high level of aerobic sterol uptake. Another predicted transcriptional activator, the YLR228c gene product, is highly homologous to Upc2p. In fact, at the carboxy terminus 130 of the last 139 amino acids are similar between the two proteins. Since these proteins are very similar, the effect of mutations in the YLR228c open reading frame (ORF) was compared with like alterations in UPC2 . First, the YLR228c ORF was insertionally inactivated and crossed with various UPC2 constructs. Deletion of YLR228c and UPC2 in combination resulted in nonviability, suggesting that the two proteins have some essential overlapping function. The upc2 - 1 point mutation responsible for aerobic sterol uptake was duplicated in the homologous carboxy region of the YLR228c ORF using site-directed mutagenesis. This mutation on a high-copy vector resulted in an increase in sterol uptake compared to an isogenic wild-type strain. The combination of both point mutations resulted in the greatest level of aerobic sterol uptake. When the YLR228c point mutation was expressed from a low-copy vector there was little if any effect on sterol uptake. Gas chromatographic analysis of the nonsaponifiable fractions of the various strains showed that the major sterol for all YLR228c and UPC2 combinations was ergosterol, the consensus yeast sterol.