Bobby Lam

Mr. Bobby Lam

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 February 2025 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMark Franciscus Adrianus Bierhuizen
Mark Franciscus Adrianus Bierhuizen
JAJorik Hans Amesz
Jorik Hans Amesz
SLSanne Janneke Joanna Langmuur
Sanne Janneke Joanna Langmuur
BLBobby Lam
Bobby Lam
PKPaul Knops
Paul Knops
YTYannick Taverne
Yannick Taverne
Proof-of-concept to determine the direct biomechanical effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). Left ventricular LMS from patients with end-stage HF were produced and cultured in a biomimetic system with mechanical loading and electrical stimulation. CCM stimulation (80 mA, 40 ms delay, 21 ms duration) enhanced maximum contractile force (CCM: 1229 µN (587–2658) vs. baseline: 1066 µN (529–2128), p = 0.05) and area under the contractile curve (CCM: 297 (151–562) vs. baseline: 243 (129–464), p = 0.05) but did not significantly impact contractile duration, time to peak, or time to relaxation. Increasing CCM stimulation delay, duration, and amplitude resulted in a higher fraction of LMS with a positive inotropic response. Furthermore, CCM attenuated the negative force-frequency relationship in HF-LMS. CCM stimulation enhanced contractile force in HF-LMS. The fraction of LMS exerting a positive inotropic response to CCM increased with increasing delay, duration, and amplitude settings, suggesting that personalizing stimulation parameters could optimize the beneficial effects of CCM. CCM is a novel device-based therapy that may improve contractile function, ejection fraction, functional outcomes, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. However, continuous efforts are needed to identify true responders to CCM therapy, understand the exact mechanisms, and optimize the contractile response to CCM stimulation. The present study revealed that CCM enhanced the contractile force of HF-LMS in a stimulation setting-dependent manner, reaching a larger fraction of the myocardium while increasing delay, duration, and amplitude. This understanding may contribute to the individualization of CCM stimulation settings.

23 December 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
MBMark Franciscus Adrianus Bierhuizen
Mark Franciscus Adrianus Bierhuizen
JAJorik Hans Amesz
Jorik Hans Amesz
SLSanne Janneke Joanna Langmuur
Sanne Janneke Joanna Langmuur
BLBobby Lam
Bobby Lam
PKPaul Knops
Paul Knops
YTYannick Taverne
Yannick Taverne
1.1 Aims: Proof-of-concept to determine the direct biomechanical effects of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) on living myocardial slices (LMS) from patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). 1.2 Methods and results: Left ventricular LMS from patients with end-stage HF were produced and cultured in a biomimetic system with mechanical loading and electrical stimulation. CCM stimulation (80 mA, 40 ms delay, 21 ms duration) enhanced maximum contractile force (CCM: 1229 µN (587 – 2658) vs. baseline: 1066 µN (529 – 2128), p = 0.05) and area under the contractile curve (CCM: 297 (151 – 562) vs. baseline: 243 (129 – 464), p = 0.05), but did not significantly impact contractile duration, time to peak or time to relaxation. Increasing CCM stimulation delay, duration and amplitude resulted in a higher fraction of LMS with a positive inotropic response. Furthermore, CCM attenuated the negative force-frequency relationship in HF-LMS. 1.3 Conclusion: CCM stimulation enhanced contractile force in HF-LMS. The fraction of LMS exerting a positive inotropic response to CCM increased with increasing delay, duration and amplitude settings, suggesting that personalizing stimulation parameters could optimize the beneficial effects of CCM. 1.4 Translational perspective CCM is a novel device-based therapy that may improve contractile function, ejection fraction, functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with heart failure. However, continuous efforts are needed to identify true responders to CCM therapy, understand the exact mechanisms and to optimize the contractile response to CCM stimulation. The present study revealed that CCM enhanced contractile force of HF-LMS in a stimulation setting dependent manner, reaching a larger fraction of the myocardium while increasing delay, duration and amplitude. This understanding may contribute to the individualization of CCM stimulation settings.