We conducted a targeted literature review to understand the determinants of meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) and meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination coverage and adherence to vaccination schedules in the USA, and to identify evidence to support improvement of MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence in older adolescents. Sources published since 2011 were considered, with sources published since 2015 given preference. Out of 2355 citations screened, 47 (46 studies) were selected for inclusion. Determinants of coverage and adherence ranging from patient-level sociodemographic factors to policy-level factors were identified. Four determinants identified were associated with improved coverage and adherence: (1) well-child, preventive, or vaccination-only appointments (particularly for older adolescents); (2) provider-initiated, provider-driven vaccine recommendations; (3) provider education about meningococcal disease and vaccine recommendations; and (4) state-level school-entry immunization policies. This robust review of the literature sheds light on the continued low MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence among older adolescents (16–23 years of age) compared with that of younger adolescents (11–15 years of age) in the USA. The evidence supports a renewed call to action by local and national health authorities and medical organizations urging healthcare professionals to implement a healthcare visit for 16-year-olds and focus on vaccination as a key component of the visit.

Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of targeted immune modulators (TIMs) in TIM-naïve/mixed populations (≤ 20% TIM-experienced) and TIM-experienced (> 20% TIM-experienced) adults with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to or intolerance of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). Methods A fixed-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using published study-level data from 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from two recent systematic literature reviews conducted by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, and two additional phase III trials for filgotinib (FINCH-1, FINCH-2). RCTs that compared TIMs with each other, cDMARD therapy, or placebo were included. Treatments included Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi), and other non-TNFi therapies. Efficacy was defined as achieving remission with a DAS28 score < 2.6 at 12 and 24 weeks. Results In the 12-week analysis for the TIM-naïve/mixed population, all TIMs combined with cDMARD therapy were significantly more likely to achieve remission compared with a cDMARD alone, with intravenous tocilizumab showing a substantially greater magnitude of effect (odds ratio 19.36; 95% credible interval 11.01–38.16). Similarly, in the 24-week analysis, intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab showed the highest odds ratio of achieving DAS28 remission compared with cDMARD therapy. Similar trends were observed for the analyses on monotherapy or TIM-experienced population. Conclusions This NMA demonstrated that tocilizumab is associated with a greater likelihood of remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at 12 and 24 weeks compared with most other TIMs, including new JAK inhibitors, when used in combination with a cDMARD or as monotherapy among TIM-naïve/mixed or TIM-experienced populations.

Treatment resistance due to gene alterations remains a challenge for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC). A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe resistance mutation profiles and their impact on clinical outcomes in adults with a/mNSCLC in the United States (US). A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase (2018–August 2022) identified 2986 records. Among 45 included studies, osimertinib was the most commonly reported treatment (osimertinib alone: 15 studies; as one of the treatment options: 18 studies), followed by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; 5 studies) and non-TKIs (1 study). For first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) osimertinib, the most frequent EGFR-dependent resistance mechanisms were T790M loss (1L: 15.4%; 2L: 20.5–49%) and C797X mutation (1L: 2.9–12.5%; 2L: 1.4–22%). EGFR-independent mechanisms included MET amplification (1L: 0.6–66%; 2L: 7.2–19%), TP53 mutation (1L: 29.2–33.3%), and CCNE1 amplification (1L: 7.9%; 2L: 10.3%). For patients receiving osimertinib, EGFR T790M mutation loss, EGFR/MET/HER2 amplification, RET fusion, and PIK3CA mutation were associated with worse progression-free survival. Resistance mechanisms resulting from current NSCLC treatments in the US are complex, underscoring the need to address such heterogeneous resistance profiles and improve outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutated a/mNSCLC.

Background The objective of the study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of targeted immune modulators (TIMs) in TIM-naïve/mixed (≤ 20% TIM-experienced) and TIM-experienced (> 20% TIM-experienced) adults with moderately-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs). Methods A fixed effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using published study-level data form 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), identified from 2 recent systematic literature reviews conducted by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, and 2 additional phase III trials for filgotinib (FINCH-1, FINCH-2). RCTs that compared TIMs to each other, cDMARD or placebo were included. Treatments included Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi), and other non-TNFis. Efficacy was defined as achieving remission with a DAS28 score < 2.6 at 12 and 24 weeks. Results In the 12-week analysis for the TIM-naïve/mixed population, all TIMs combined with cDMARD were more likely to achieve remission compared to cDMARD alone (statistically significant), with intravenous tocilizumab showing a substantially greater magnitude of effect (odds ratio = 19.36, 95% credible interval: 11.01, 38.16). Similarly, in the 24-week analysis, intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab showed the highest odds ratio of achieving DAS28 remission compared to cDMARD. Similar trends were observed for the analyses on monotherapy or TIM-experienced population. Conclusion This NMA demonstrated that tocilizumab is associated with a greater likelihood of remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at 12 and 24 weeks compared to most other TIMs including new JAK inhibitors, when used in combination with a cDMARD or as monotherapy, among TIM-naïve/mixed or TIM-experienced populations.