Block-level urban land use classification (BLULUC), like residential and commercial classification, is highly useful for urban planners. It can be achieved in the form of high-frequency full coverage without biases based on the data of high-spatial-resolution remote sensing images (HSRRSIs), which social sensing data like POI data or mobile phone data cannot provide. However, at present, the extraction of quantitative features from HSRRSIs for BLULUC primarily relies on computer vision or deep learning methods based on image signal characteristics rather than land cover patterns, like vegetation, water, or buildings, thus disconnecting existing knowledge between the landscape patterns and their functions as well as greatly hindering BLULUC by HSRRSIs. Well-known landscape metrics could play an important connecting role, but these also encounter the scale selection issue; i.e., the optimal spatial unit size is an image pixel or a segmented image object. Here, we use the task of BLULUC with 2 m satellite images in Beijing as a case study. The results show the following: (1) pixel-based classification can achieve higher accuracy than segmented object-based classification, with an average of 3% in overall aspects, while some land use types could reach 10%, such as commercial land. (2) At the pixel scale, if the quantity metrics at the class level, such as the number of patches, and the proportion metrics at the landscape level, such as vegetation proportion, are removed, the accuracy can be greatly reduced. Moreover, removing landscape-level metrics can lead to a more significant reduction in accuracy than removing class-level metrics. This indicates that in order to achieve a higher accuracy in BLULUC from HSRRSIs, landscape-level land cover metrics, including patch numbers and proportions at the pixel scale, can be used instead of object-scale metrics.