Although multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2) confers chemoresistance in some cancer types, its implication on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We evaluated MRP2 expression by immunohistochemistry and RT–PCR using 81 resected specimens from ESCC patients who did or did not receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), including 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CDDP). Correlation between MRP2 expression and response to chemotherapy was also examined in 42 pre-therapeutic biopsy samples and eight ESCC cell lines. MRP2-positive immunostaining was more frequently observed in ESCCs with NACT than in those without NACT (27.3 vs 5.4%). The MRP2-positive patients showed poorer prognosis than MRP2-negative patients (5-year survival rate, 25.6 vs 55.7%). Concordantly, ESCC with NACT showed 2.1-fold higher mRNA expression of MRP2 than those without NACT (P=0.0350). In pre-therapeutic biopsy samples of patients with NACT, non-responders showed 2.9-fold higher mRNA expression of MRP2 than responders (P=0.0035). Among the panel of ESCC cell lines, TE14 showed the highest MRP2 mRNA expression along with the strongest resistance to CDDP. Inhibition of MRP2 expression by small-interfering RNA reduced chemoresistance to CDDP. Our data suggested that MRP2 is one of molecules, which regulate the sensitivity to chemotherapy including CDDP in advanced ESCC patients.
Background: Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are ectopic lymphoid aggregates in non-lymphoid tissues, which are associated with improved prognosis in some cancer types. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of TLSs in oesophageal cancer (EC). Methods: In a series of 316 EC surgical specimens from two different institutes, we evaluated the density and maturity of peritumoral TLSs using haematoxylin/eosin, immunohistochemistry, and multiplex immunofluorescence staining. We analysed the association between TLSs and clinicopathological parameters. The clinical significance of TLSs was further evaluated in a different cohort of 34 patients with recurrent EC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody. Results: Tumours with high TLS density predominantly consisted of matured TLSs. High TLS density was significantly associated with less advanced tumour stage, absence of lymphatic/vascular invasion, better serum nutrition parameters (neutrophils count, albumin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutritional index), and prolonged survival. This survival trend was more remarkable in cases with matured TLSs, which represented an increased population of CD138+ plasma cells. In the second EC cohort, TLS density predicted the clinical response to anti-PD-1 antibody and patient survival. Conclusion: The density and maturity of peritumoral TLSs are useful parameters for predicting long-term survival and response to anti-PD-1 antibody treatment in EC patients.
The association between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and treatment response or survival has been a recent focus in several types of cancer. However, most study materials are resected specimens that were completely modified by prior chemotherapy; therefore, the unmodified host immune condition has not yet been clarified. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between TME assessed in pre–therapeutic biopsy samples and chemoresistance in esophageal cancer (EC). A total of 86 endoscopic biopsy samples from EC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgery were evaluated for the number of intratumoral CD4+ lymphocytes (with/without Foxp3 expression), CD8+ lymphocytes (with/without PD‐1 expression), monocytes (CD14+) and macrophages (CD86+, CD163+ and CD206+) by multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC). The number of tumor‐infiltrating CD206+ macrophages I significantly correlated with cT, cM, cStage and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), whereas the number of lymphocytes (including expression of Foxp3 and PD‐1) was not associated with clinico‐pathological features. The high infiltration of CD163+ or CD206+ macrophages was significantly associated with poor pathological response to NAC (P = 0.0057 and 0.0196, respectively). Expression of arginase‐1 in CD163+ macrophages tended to be higher in non–responders (29.4% vs 18.2%, P = 0.17). In addition, patients with high infiltration of M2 macrophages exhibited unfavorable overall survival compared to those without high infiltration of M2 macrophages (5‐year overall survival 57.2% vs 71.0%, P = 0.0498). Thus, a comprehensive analysis of TME using multiplex IHC revealed that M2 macrophage infiltration would be useful in predicting the response to NAC and long‐term survival in EC patients.
Objective: Here, we assess the ability of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapy response for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Background: Optimal methods to evaluate treatment response for EC patients have not yet been established. Although previous studies have reported the value of standardized uptake value (SUV), the accuracy of predicting histological response or long-term survival in EC is limited. Methods: In all, 102 EC patients without distant metastasis who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT both before and after the preoperative chemotherapy series were analyzed. Results: The median primary tumor MTV values before and after preoperative chemotherapy were 22.55 (range 0.4–183.1) and 2.75 (0–52.9), respectively, and the median MVT reduction rate was 86.5%. We found the most significant difference in survival between PET responders and nonresponders with a cut-off value of 60% MTV reduction, using a 10% stepwise cut-off analysis [2-year progression-free survival (PFS): 79.2 vs 44.4%; hazard ratio (HR) 3.397; P < 0.0001). With this cut-off value, histological response (P = 0.0091), tumor location (P = 0.0102), pT (P = 0.0011), and pN (P = 0.0110) were significantly associated with PET response. Univariate analysis of PFS indicated a correlation between PFS and tumor size, cT, decrease of primary lesion by CT, SUVmax reduction rate, MTV reduction rate, pT, pN, and pM. Multivariate analysis further identified pM (HR 3.063; P = 0.0279) and MTV reduction rate (HR 2.471; P = 0.0263) to be independent prognostic predictors, but not decrease of primary lesion by CT or SUVmax reduction rate. Conclusion: MTV change is clinically useful in predicting both long-term survival and histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in EC patients, after determining the optimal cut-off value based on survival analysis.