Zhun Xiao

Dr. Zhun Xiao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2021 in International Immunopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FYFangming Yang
Fangming Yang
HLHeng Li
Heng Li
YLYanmin Li
Yanmin Li
YHYaokun Hao
Yaokun Hao
CWChenxiao Wang
Chenxiao Wang
ZXZhun Xiao
Zhun Xiao

23 May 2025 in Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZXZhun Xiao
Zhun Xiao
SGSiqi Gao
Siqi Gao
SLShengsheng Li
Shengsheng Li
FYFangming Yang
Fangming Yang
DZDingqi Zhang
Dingqi Zhang
SMSuping Ma
Suping Ma

20 December 2025 in Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYang Liu
Yang Liu
SLShengsheng Li
Shengsheng Li
XZXiaonuo Zhao
Xiaonuo Zhao
JTJing Tian
Jing Tian
ZXZhun Xiao
Zhun Xiao
SMSuping Ma
Suping Ma

12 June 2026 in Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYang Liu
Yang Liu
SLShengsheng Li
Shengsheng Li
XZXiaonuo Zhao
Xiaonuo Zhao
JTJing Tian
Jing Tian
ZXZhun Xiao
Zhun Xiao
SMSuping Ma
Suping Ma

6 January 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GXGuoxiang Xie
Guoxiang Xie
XWXiaoning Wang
Xiaoning Wang
RWRunmin Wei
Runmin Wei
JWJingye Wang
Jingye Wang
AZAihua Zhao
Aihua Zhao
WJWei Jia
Wei Jia
Background & Aims: Accurate and noninvasive diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis is essential for effective clinical management of chronic liver disease (CLD). We aimed to identify serum metabolite markers that reliably predict the stage of fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We quantitatively profiled serum metabolites of participants in 2 independent cohorts. Based on the metabolomics data from Cohort 1 (504 HBV associated liver fibrosis patients and 502 normal controls, NC), we selected a panel of 4 predictive metabolite markers. Consequently, we constructed 3 machine learning models with the 4 metabolite markers using random forest (RF), to differentiate CLD patients from normal controls (NC), to differentiate cirrhosis patients from fibrosis patients, and to differentiate advanced fibrosis from early fibrosis, respectively. Results: The panel of 4 metabolite markers consisted of taurocholate, tyrosine, valine, and linoelaidic acid. The RF models of the metabolite panel demonstrated the strongest stratification ability in Cohort 1 to diagnose CLD patients from NC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.997 and the precision-recall curve (AUPR) = 0.994), to differentiate fibrosis from cirrhosis (0.941, 0.870), and to stage liver fibrosis (0.918, 0.892). The diagnostic accuracy of the models was further validated in an independent Cohort 2 consisting of 300 CLD patients with chronic HBV infection and 90 NC. The AUCs of the models were consistently higher than APRI, FIB-4 and AST/ALT ratio, with both greater sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: Our study showed that this 4-metabolite panel has potential usefulness in clinical assessments of CLD progression.