In the last decades, the conceptualization of schizophrenia has dramatically changed, moving from a neurodegenerative process occurring in early adult life to a neurodevelopmental disorder starting be-fore birth, showing a variety of premorbid and prodromal symptoms and, in relatively few cases, evolving in the full-blown psychotic syndrome. High rates of co-occurring different neurodevelopmental disorders such as Autism spectrum disorder and ADHD, predating the onset of SCZ, and neurobio-logical underpinning with significant similarities, support the notion of a pan-developmental disturbance consisting of impairments in neuromotor, receptive language, social and cognitive development. Con-sidering that many SCZ risk factors may be similar to symptoms of other neurodevelopmental psychi-atric disorders, transition processes from child & adolescent to adult systems of care should include both high risk people as well as subject with other neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders with different levels of severity. This descriptive mini-review discuss the need of innovative clinical approaches, re-considering specific diagnostic categories, stimulating a careful analysis of risk factors and promoting the appropriate use of new and safer medications.

Background. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a prevalent, high-burden disorder. Esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) has been approved for, T.R.D.; and efficacy has been observed in both clinical trials and real-world studies. However, observations integrating patients’ perspective on this treatment are limited. This multicentric Italian study explored experiences with ESK-NS in TRD patients, focusing on perceived therapeutic effects and overall satisfaction. Methods. A self-report survey was administered to 236 outpatients with TRD (55.1% females, 54.1 ± 14.1 years) treated with ESK-NS for at least three consecutive months within standard clinical care. Based on satisfaction levels, participants were classified as “unsatisfied” (10.2%), “partially satisfied” (19.1%), “satisfied” (44.4%), or “very satisfied” (26.3%), and compared for sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and feedback on perceived benefits. Artificial intelligence (OpenAI) served to categorize responses to an open-ended question. Results. Enhanced quality of life was reported by 88.4% of participants. Significant differences emerged in earliest self-perceived benefits, most relevant effects, and impact on global functioning across groups. Specifically, “very satisfied” patients described the following: early improvements in depressed mood, suicidal thoughts, and restlessness; decreased suicidal thoughts among the most significant effects; and functional gains across all domains. OpenAI identified experiences of personal growth and rediscovery and a desire for tailored settings and approaches as recurring topics. Conclusions. Most patients reported a positive perception of ESK-NS treatment. The most satisfied participants highlighted significant benefits to depressed mood, suicidal thoughts, and overall functioning. Patient-reported experiences offer insights into different psychopathological dimensions, including functional outcomes and quality of life. Integrating these perspectives into clinical practice might assist treatment personalization, improving patients’ adherence and satisfaction.

Purpose: Vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials and is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, data are limited concerning its effectiveness when used in routine clinical care. The Real-Life Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Depression (RELIEVE) study aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine for the treatment of MDD in routine clinical practice in Canada, France, Italy, and the USA. This paper presents findings for the patient cohort in Italy. Patients and Methods: RELIEVE was a 6-month, international, observational, prospective cohort study in outpatients initiating vortioxetine treatment for MDD in routine care settings at their physician’s discretion (NCT03555136). Patient functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Secondary outcomes included depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), cognitive symptoms (5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression [PDQ-D-5]), and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L]). Changes from baseline to month 6 were assessed using mixed models for repeated measures, adjusted for relevant confounders. Results: Data are available for 231 patients enrolled in Italy (mean age, 55.5 years; 27% > 65 years). Overall, 69% of patients reported at least one comorbidity, 55% were overweight/obese, and 47% had current anxiety symptoms. Adjusted least-squares mean (standard error) change in SDS score from baseline to week 24 was − 6.6 (0.6) points (P < 0.001). Respective changes in PHQ-9, PDQ-D-5, and EQ-5D-5L scores were − 5.9 (0.5), − 3.6 (0.4), and +0.13 (0.01) points (all P < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 29 patients (13%), most commonly nausea (n = 14, 6%). Eleven patients (5%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: Clinically relevant and sustained improvements in overall functioning, symptoms of depression, cognitive symptoms, and health-related quality of life were observed in patients with MDD treated with vortioxetine over a period of 6 months in routine care in Italy, including a high proportion of elderly patients.

Introduction: Aripiprazole long acting once-monthly (AOM) is a long acting atypical antipsychotic with proven efficacy in schizophrenia and with a pharmacological and a side effect profile that is ...

Introduction: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a debilitating condition affecting 20–30% of patients with major depressive disorders (MDD). Currently, there is no established standard of care for TRD, and wide variation in the clinical approach for disease management has been documented. Real-world data could help describe TRD clinical features, disease burden, and treatment outcome and identify a potential unmet medical need.Methods: We analyzed the Italian data from a European, prospective, multicentric, observational cohort study of patients fulfilling TRD criteria by the European Medicine Agency, with moderate to severe major depressive episode, and starting a new antidepressant treatment according to routinary clinical practice. They were followed up for minimum 6 months. Treatments received throughout the study period, disease severity, health-related quality of life and functioning were prospectively recorded and analyzed.Results: The Italian subcohort included 124 TRD patients (30.2% of patients of the European cohort; mean age 53.2 [sd = 9.8], women: 82, 66.1%). At enrollement, the mean (SD) duration of MDD was 16 years (sd = 11.1) and the mean duration of the ongoing major depressive episode (MDE) was 97.5 weeks (sd = 143.5); low scores of quality of life and functioning were reported. The most frequently antidepressant classes started at baseline (data available for 98 subjects) were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI, 42 patients [42.9%]) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI, 32 patients [32.7%]). In terms of treatment strategies, 50 patients (51%) started augmentation therapies, 18 (18.4%) combination therapies and 24 (24.5%) monoterapies (6 patients [6%] started a non-antidepressant drug only). Fourteen patients (11.3%) were treated with a psychosocial approach, including psychotherapy. After 6 months of treatment, clinical assessments were collected for 89 patients: 64 (71.9%) showed no response, 9 (10.1%) response without remission and 16 (18.0%) were in remission; non-responder patients showed lower quality of life and higher disability scores than responder patients.Conclusions: In our sample of TRD patients, we documented substantial illness burden, low perceived quality of life and poor outcome, suggesting an unmet treatment need in TRD care in Italy.Registration Number:ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT03373253.

Aripiprazole as a long-acting injectable (LAI) is initiated in oral aripiprazole-stabilised patients and needs, after first injection, 14 days supplementation of oral aripiprazole (one-injection start, OIS). Recently, an alternative two-injection start (TIS) was advanced, involving two 400 mg injections with a single 20 mg oral supplementation of aripiprazole. We tested the two regimens in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ, n = 152, 90 men and 62 women) with (SUD⁺; n = 93) or without (SUD^–; n = 59) substance use disorders (SUDs), comparing OIS (n = 66) with TIS (n = 86) and SUD⁺ vs. SUD^–. For 26 patients, we measured weekly for one month, aripiprazole + dehydroaripiprazole (active moiety) levels. Patients were followed for three months after LAI with psychopathology and quality-of-life scales (BPRS, CGI-S, ACES, BIS-11, and WHOQOL). All groups improved in psychopathology with no differences between OSI and TIS and between SCZ–SUD⁺ and SCZ–SUD^–. The TIS group was associated with serum blood levels of the active moiety within the therapeutic window, while the OIS group showed peaks above the window, possibly exposing patients to toxicity. Treatments were well-tolerated. Here we showed no disadvantages for TIS vs. OIS and possibly increased safety. Shifting the initiation of aripiprazole LAIs to the TIS modality may be safe and pharmacokinetically advantageous.