Beth S.Slomine

Dr. Beth S.Slomine


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2006 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBeth S.Slomine
Beth S.Slomine
MMMelissa L. McCarthy
Melissa L. McCarthy
RDRu Ding
Ru Ding
EMEllen J. MacKenzie
Ellen J. MacKenzie
KJKenneth M. Jaffe
Kenneth M. Jaffe
TGthe CHAT Study Group
the CHAT Study Group
OBJECTIVE. Children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) show early neurobehavioral deficits that can persist several years after injury. Despite the negative impact that TBI can have on a child's physical, cognitive, and psychosocial well-being, only 1 study to date has documented the receipt of health care services after acute care and the needs of children after TBI. The purpose of this study was to document the health care use and needs of children after a TBI and to identify factors that are associated with unmet or unrecognized health care needs during the first year after injury. METHODS. The health care use and needs of children who sustained a TBI were obtained via telephone interview with a primary caregiver at 2 and 12 months after injury. Of the 330 who enrolled in the study, 302 (92%) completed the 3-month and 288 (87%) completed the 12-month follow-up interviews. The health care needs of each child were categorized as no need, met need, unmet need, or unrecognized need on the basis of the child's use of post-acute services, the caregiver's report of unmet need, and the caregiver's report of the child's functioning as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Regardless of the use of services or level of function, children of caregivers who reported an unmet need for a health care service were defined as having unmet need. Children who were categorized as having no needs were defined as those who did not receive services; whose caregiver did not report unmet need for a service; and the whose physical, socioemotional, and cognitive functioning was reported to be normal by the caregiver. Children with met needs were those who used services in a particular domain and whose caregivers did not report need for additional services. Finally, children with unrecognized needs were those whose caregiver reported cognitive, physical, or socioemotional dysfunction; who were not receiving services to address the dysfunction; and whose caregiver did not report unmet need for services. Polytomous logistic regression was used to model unmet and unrecognized need at 3 and 12 months after injury as a function of child, family, and injury characteristics. RESULTS. At 3 months after injury, 62% of the study sample reported receiving at least 1 outpatient health care service. Most frequently, children visited a doctor (56%) or a physical therapist (27%); however, 37% of caregivers reported that their child did not see a physician at all during the first year after injury. At 3 and 12 months after injury, 26% and 31% of children, respectively, had unmet/unrecognized health care needs. The most frequent type of unmet or unrecognized need was for cognitive services. The top 3 reasons for unmet need at 3 and 12 months were (1) not recommended by doctor (34% and 31%); (2) not recommended/provided by school (16% and 17%); and (3) cost too much (16% and 16%). Factors that were associated with unmet or unrecognized need changed over time. At 3 months after injury, the caregivers of children with a preexisting psychosocial condition were 3 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who did not have one. Also, female caregivers were significantly more likely to report unmet need compared with male caregivers. Finally, the caregivers of children with Medicaid were almost 2 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who were covered by commercial insurance. The only factor that was associated with unrecognized need at 3 months after injury was abnormal family functioning. At 12 months after injury, although TBI severity was not significant, children who sustained a major associated injury were 2 times more likely to report unmet need compared with children who did not. Consistent with the 3-month results, the caregivers of children with Medicaid were significantly more likely to report unmet needs at 1 year after injury. In addition to poor family functioning's being associated with unrecognized need, nonwhite children were significantly more likely to have unrecognized needs at 1 year compared with white children. CONCLUSIONS. A substantial proportion of children with TBI had unmet or unrecognized health care needs during the first year after injury. It is recommended that pediatricians be involved in the post-acute care follow-up of children with TBI to ensure that the injured child's needs are being addressed in a timely and appropriate manner. One of the recommendations that trauma center providers should make on hospital discharge is that the parent/primary caregiver schedule a visit with the child's pediatrician regardless of the post-acute services that the child may be receiving. Because unmet and unrecognized need was highest for cognitive services, it is important to screen for cognitive dysfunction in the primary care setting. Finally, because the health care needs of children with TBI change over time, it is important for pediatricians to monitor their recovery to ensure that children with TBI receive the services that they need to restore their health after injury.

1 January 2009 in Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBeth S.Slomine
Beth S.Slomine
GLGianna Locascio
Gianna Locascio

1 January 2002 in Brain Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBeth S.Slomine
Beth S.Slomine
JGJoan P. Gerring
Joan P. Gerring
MGMarco Grados
Marco Grados
RVRoma Vasa
Roma Vasa
KBKathleen D. Brady
Kathleen D. Brady
MDMartha Bridge Denckla
Martha Bridge Denckla
Objective : To investigate the relationships among age at injury, neuroanatomic lesion location, and measures of executive function (EF) following paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods : EF was assessed in 68 children (aged 7-15) with moderate-to-severe TBI 1 year post-injury. EF tests included: (1) Tower of Hanoi (TOH), a measure of problem solving ability, (2) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a measure of categorization and ability to shift cognitive strategies, (3) Letter Fluency (LF), a measure of novel lexical search and rule-governed word generation. EF variables included number of moves needed to achieve a 3-ring solution on the TOH, number of perseverative and non-perseverative errors on the WCST, and number of words generated on LF. Intellectual functioning was also assessed using the Verbal Intellectual Quotient (VIQ) from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale from Children-3rd edn (WISC-III). Data from standardized MRIs, performed at 3-months post-injury, were available for all subjects and were used to determine lesion location, lesion volumes, and total number of lesions. The relationships among EF, lesion variables (frontal lesion volume, extrafrontal lesion volume, total number of lesions) and age at injury were examined. Pre-injury special education services and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were controlled for. Results : Younger age at injury was associated with more perseverative errors on the WCST and worse performance on LF. Frontal lesion volume was not predictive of performance on any measures of EF. Greater extrafrontal lesion volume and total number of lesions were predictive of worse performance on LF. When controlling for pre-injury special education placement and pre-injury ADHD, there was little change in the results. Conclusions : Younger age at injury places children at greater risk of impairment on measures of EF. Performance on measures of EF depends on brain variables other than frontal lobes including extrafrontal cortical brain areas and total number of lesions. The relationship between extrafrontal brain regions and EF suggests that domain-specific cognitive content (i.e. language or visuospatial analysis), mediated by the parietal or temporal lobes, may disrupt underlying cognitive processes necessary for successful performance on measures of EF. In addition, the association between total number of lesions and EF may be related to disconnections and disruption of frontal/subcortical systems.

1 January 2008 in Brain Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWesley R. Cole
Wesley R. Cole
JGJoan P. Gerring
Joan P. Gerring
RGRobert M. Gray
Robert M. Gray
RVRoma A. Vasa
Roma A. Vasa
CSCynthia F. Salorio
Cynthia F. Salorio
BSBeth S.Slomine
Beth S.Slomine
The goals of this study were to explore the prevalence of aggressive behaviours after severe paediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and identify predictors of aggressive behaviours 1 year post-injury. A cohort of 97 children aged 4-19 years at time of severe TBI (GCS 3-8) were prospectively followed for 1 year. Pre-injury psychiatric status was obtained retrospectively at enrolment and post-injury behavioural and functional concerns were assessed at 1 year. Aggression was measured with a modified version of the Overt Aggression Scale (OAS). Results revealed aggressive behaviour increased from pre-injury to post-injury. Pre-injury factors including aggression, attention problems and anxiety were associated with increased post-injury aggressive behaviour. Children with greater disability after injury were also at increased risk for aggressive behaviours. Aggression is a prevalent symptom after paediatric TBI and can significantly impede rehabilitation. Awareness of these predictors can aid in early identification of children at risk in order to help appropriately design rehabilitation programmes.

1 April 2016 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBeth S.Slomine
Beth S.Slomine
FSFaye S. Silverstein
Faye S. Silverstein
JCJames R. Christensen
James R. Christensen
RHRichard Holubkov
Richard Holubkov
KPKent Page
Kent Page
OGon behalf of the THAPCA Trial Group
on behalf of the THAPCA Trial Group
OBJECTIVE: This study examined 12-month neurobehavioral outcomes in children who survived out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OH-CA), were comatose after resuscitation, and were enrolled in a clinical trial to evaluate targeted temperature management to hypothermia (33.0°C) or normothermia (36.8°C) (Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest, Out-of-Hopsital [THAPCA-OH]; NCT00878644). METHODS: Baseline functioning was assessed by caregiver responses on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition (VABS-II) soon after OH-CA (based on functioning before OH-CA); children with broadly normal baseline functioning (VABS-II ≥70) were included in the THAPCA-OH primary outcome. VABS-II was completed again 12 months later. Then, face-to-face cognitive evaluations were completed. Analyses evaluated changes in VABS-II composite, domain, and subdomain scores and cognitive functioning at follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 295 enrolled children were alive at 12 months; 87 of 96 had broadly normal baseline functioning (VABS-II ≥70). Follow-up was obtained on 85/87. Forty-two of 85 had VABS-II ≥70 at 12 months. VABS-II composite, domain, and subdomain scores declined significantly between baseline and 12-month follow-up (P < .001). Declines were greatest in older children. Most children displayed well below average cognitive functioning. Older age at cardiac arrest and higher baseline VABS-II scores were predictive of greater decline in neurobehavioral function. Treatment with hypothermia did not influence neurobehavioral outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study exploring long-term neurobehavioral outcomes in children surviving OH-CA who were comatose after resuscitation. Results revealed significant neurobehavioral morbidity across multiple functional domains, based both on caregiver reports and performance on objective cognitive measures, in survivors 1 year later.

8 August 2023 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMErika Molteni
Erika Molteni
LCLiane dos Santos Canas
Liane dos Santos Canas
MBMarie-Michèle Briand
Marie-Michèle Briand
AMAlfonso Magliacano
Alfonso Magliacano
CFCarolina Colomer Font
Carolina Colomer Font
ASas the Special Interest Group on DoC of the International Brain Injury Association (IBIA-DoC SIG)
as the Special Interest Group on DoC of the International Brain Injury Association (IBIA-DoC SIG)
Background and Objectives Comprehensive guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of disorders of consciousness (DoC) in pediatric patients have not yet been released. We aimed to summarize available evidence for DoC with >14 days duration to support the future development of guidelines for children, adolescents and young adults aged 6 months–18 years. Methods This scoping review was reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses–extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search identified records from 4 databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Abstracts received 3 blind reviews. Corresponding full-text articles rated as “in-scope” and reporting data not published in any other retained article (i.e., no double reporting) were identified and assigned to 5 thematic evaluating teams. Full-text articles were reviewed using a double-blind standardized form. Level of evidence was graded, and summative statements were generated. Results On November 9, 2022, 2,167 documents had been identified; 132 articles were retained, of which 33 (25%) were published over the past 5 years. Overall, 2,161 individuals met the inclusion criteria; female patients were 527 of 1,554 (33.9%) cases included, whose sex was identifiable. Of 132 articles, 57 (43.2%) were single case reports and only 5 (3.8%) clinical trials; the level of evidence was prevalently low (80/132; 60.6%). Most studies included neurobehavioral measures (84/127; 66.1%) and neuroimaging (81/127; 63.8%); 59 (46.5%) were mainly related to diagnosis, 56 (44.1%) to prognosis, and 44 (34.6%) to treatment. Most frequently used neurobehavioral tools included the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised, Coma/Near-Coma Scale, Level of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale, and Post-Acute Level of Consciousness scale. EEG, event-related potentials, structural CT, and MRI were the most frequently used instrumental techniques. In 29/53 (54.7%) cases, DoC improvement was observed, which was associated with treatment with amantadine. Discussion The literature on pediatric DoCs is mainly observational, and clinical details are either inconsistently presented or absent. Conclusions drawn from many studies convey insubstantial evidence and have limited validity and low potential for translation in clinical practice. Despite these limitations, our work summarizes the extant literature and constitutes a base for future guidelines related to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pediatric DoC.