Gianluigi Bisleri

Prof. Gianluigi Bisleri

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 July 2017 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Matthias ThielmannMatthias Thielmann
Matthias Thielmann
VSVikram Sharma
Vikram Sharma
NANawwar Al-Attar
Nawwar Al-Attar
HBHeerajnarain Bulluck
Heerajnarain Bulluck
GBGianluigi Bisleri
Gianluigi Bisleri
DHDerek Hausenloy
Derek Hausenloy
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of death and disability in Europe and worldwide. For patients with multi-vessel CAD, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a common approach for coronary revascularization, and is of proven symptomatic and prognostic benefit. Due to an aging population, higher prevalence of co-morbidities (such as diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension, and renal failure), and a growing requirement for concomitant surgical procedures (such as valve and aortic surgery), higher risk patients are undergoing surgery. 1–3 This has resulted in an increased risk of peri-operative myocardial injury (PMI) 4 and Type 5 myocardial infarction (MI), both of which are associated with worsened clinical outcomes following CABG surgery. The aetiology and determinants of PMI and Type 5 MI are multi-factorial (see Tables 1 and 2 for summary). Although diagnostic criteria have been proposed for Type 5 MI (based on an elevation in cardiac biomarkers in the 48-h post-operative period and electrocardiogram/angiography/imaging evidence of MI 5, 13), there is currently no clear definition for prognostically significant PMI, in terms of the level of post-operative cardiac biomarker elevation, which is associated with worsened clinical outcomes following CABG surgery.

1 November 2004 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GAGiulio Alessandri
Giulio Alessandri
SPStefano Pagano
Stefano Pagano
ABAlessandra Bez
Alessandra Bez
ABAnna Benetti
Anna Benetti
SPStefano Pozzi
Stefano Pozzi
EPEugenio Parati
Eugenio Parati

1 April 2003 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMClaudio Muneretto
Claudio Muneretto
ANAlberto Negri
Alberto Negri
JMJacopo Manfredi
Jacopo Manfredi
ATAlberto Terrini
Alberto Terrini
GRGiulia Rodella
Giulia Rodella
GBGianluigi Bisleri
Gianluigi Bisleri

1 September 2003 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMClaudio Muneretto
Claudio Muneretto
GBGianluigi Bisleri
Gianluigi Bisleri
ANAlberto Negri
Alberto Negri
JMJacopo Manfredi
Jacopo Manfredi
MMMarco I. Metra
Marco I. Metra
LCLivio Dei Cas
Livio Dei Cas

1 December 2012 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMClaudio Muneretto
Claudio Muneretto
GBGianluigi Bisleri
Gianluigi Bisleri
LBLuca Bontempi
Luca Bontempi
ACAntonio Curnis
Antonio Curnis

8 March 2013 in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGianluigi Bisleri
Gianluigi Bisleri
FRFabrizio Rosati
Fabrizio Rosati
LBLuca Bontempi
Luca Bontempi
ACAntonio Curnis
Antonio Curnis
CMClaudio Muneretto
Claudio Muneretto
The sequential, staged hybrid approach has recently emerged as a novel strategy for the treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF); nevertheless, the potential modifications in terms of electrophysiological findings and their correlation with mid-term results have not been fully elucidated so far. Forty-five patients with long-standing persistent AF underwent a hybrid procedure combining surgical closed-chest posterior left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PV) isolation (box lesion) first, followed by transcatheter evaluation at least 1 month afterwards. Electrophysiological findings and their correlation with rhythm outcomes were assessed at different time points, i.e. following the surgical ablation (T1), during (T2) and at the end (T3) of the transcatheter evaluation and at 28-month follow-up (T4). At T1, exit and entrance blocks were achieved in 100 and 91.1% (41 of 45) of patients, respectively. At T2, the percentage of conduction block was unchanged, while at T3 also entrance block was achieved in all instances. In terms of electrophysiological findings (at T2), PV reconnection occurred in 6.7% (3 of 45) of patients, fractionated electrograms were targeted in 44.4% (20 of 45) while right atrium isthmus lesion was performed in 24.4% (11 of 45) of patients. Sinus rhythm was restored in 75.6% (34 of 45) at T1, at T2 (with AF induction) in 68.9% (31 of 45), at T3 in 93.3% (42 of 45) and at T4 in 88.9% (40 of 45) of patients, respectively. In those patients with a bidirectional block at T1, sinus rhythm restoration steadily improved from 78 (32 of 41) at T1 to 82.9 (34 of 41) at T2 and finally 92.6% (38 of 41) at T4. Complete posterior LA and PV isolation with the box lesion in a staged hybrid approach is associated with incremental benefits in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with long-standing persistent AF.