Esteban Ortiz-Prado

Dr. Esteban Ortiz-Prado

One Health Global Research Group, Universidad de las Americas, Quito, Ecuador
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2021 in npj Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nikolaos KyriakidisNikolaos Kyriakidis
Nikolaos Kyriakidis
Andrés López-CortésAndrés López-Cortés
Andrés López-Cortés
EGEduardo Vásconez González
Eduardo Vásconez González
AGAlejandra Barreto Grimaldos
Alejandra Barreto Grimaldos
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado
The new SARS-CoV-2 virus is an RNA virus that belongs to the Coronaviridae family and causes COVID-19 disease. The newly sequenced virus appears to originate in China and rapidly spread throughout the world, becoming a pandemic that, until January 5th, 2021, has caused more than 1,866,000 deaths. Hence, laboratories worldwide are developing an effective vaccine against this disease, which will be essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, there more than 64 vaccine candidates, most of them aiming to induce neutralizing antibodies against the spike protein (S). These antibodies will prevent uptake through the human ACE-2 receptor, thereby limiting viral entrance. Different vaccine platforms are being used for vaccine development, each one presenting several advantages and disadvantages. Thus far, thirteen vaccine candidates are being tested in Phase 3 clinical trials; therefore, it is closer to receiving approval or authorization for large-scale immunizations.

1 September 2020 in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado
KSKatherine Simbaña-Rivera
Katherine Simbaña-Rivera
LBLenin Gómez- Barreno
Lenin Gómez- Barreno
MRMario Rubio-Neira
Mario Rubio-Neira
Linda GuamanLinda Guaman
Linda Guaman
Andrés López-CortésAndrés López-Cortés
Andrés López-Cortés

1 February 2014 in Journal of Autoimmunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMaria Kourilovitch
Maria Kourilovitch
CGClaudi Galarza-Maldonado
Claudi Galarza-Maldonado
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado

2 July 2020 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRebekka M. F. Gerstner
Rebekka M. F. Gerstner
FLFernando Lara-Lara
Fernando Lara-Lara
EVEduardo Vasconez
Eduardo Vasconez
Ginés ViscorGinés Viscor
Ginés Viscor
JJJuan D. Jarrin
Juan D. Jarrin
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado
Background: The Ecuadorian earthquake in April 16th was the second strongest and deadliest in 2016 worldwide, with approximately one million people affected. In this paper, we analyzed the psychological impact and the relationship between mental health events and various earthquake-related stressors related to the earthquake, 9 months after the event. Methods: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study, applying an anonymous survey to 316 adolescents (13–19 years old) from Muisne, Ecuador. Suicidal tendency, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress (PTSD) were evaluated via the Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS), Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale, Okasha Suicidality Scale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the adapted seven-questions earthquake-related stressors survey. Results: We found a high prevalence of suicidal ideations and behavior, posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety compared to international studies. Even though adolescents currently living in shelters had higher levels of anxiety, their suicidal tendency was significantly lower than those living in their own or their relatives’ home. Finally, the earthquake-related stressors were not associated with suicidality and mental health events, with the exception of economic damage suffered by the family. Conclusions: High levels of depression, post-traumatic stress and anxiety among high-school students were found, especially among those who have suffered serious economic damage. The economic impact in their families and high unemployment rates among their parents seems to be related to lack of hope and favorable perspectives for their future, situation that might lead to lead to emotional disturbances and psychological disorders. Although prolonged homelessness experience in shelters may be a stressful occurrence, might also be related with spiritual growth among adolescents, and may work as a protective factor against suicidal ideations and attempts.

4 January 2021 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado
KSKatherine Simbaña-Rivera
Katherine Simbaña-Rivera
LBLenin Gómez Barreno
Lenin Gómez Barreno
ADAna Maria Diaz
Ana Maria Diaz
ABAlejandra Barreto
Alejandra Barreto
RLRachel Lowe
Rachel Lowe
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has spread rapidly around the globe. Nevertheless, there is limited information describing the characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients in Latin America. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 9,468 confirmed COVID-19 cases reported in Ecuador. We calculated overall incidence, mortality, case fatality rates, disability adjusted life years, attack and crude mortality rates, as well as relative risk and relative odds of death, adjusted for age, sex and presence of comorbidities. A total of 9,468 positive COVID-19 cases and 474 deaths were included in the analysis. Men accounted for 55.4% (n = 5, 247) of cases and women for 44.6% (n = 4, 221). We found the presence of comorbidities, being male and older than 65 years were important determinants of mortality. Coastal regions were most affected by COVID-19, with higher mortality rates than the highlands. Fatigue was reported in 53.2% of the patients, followed by headache (43%), dry cough (41.7%), ageusia (37.1%) and anosmia (36.1%). We present an analysis of the burden of COVID-19 in Ecuador. Our findings show that men are at higher risk of dying from COVID-19 than women, and risk increases with age and the presence of comorbidities. We also found that blue-collar workers and the unemployed are at greater risk of dying. These early observations offer clinical insights for the medical community to help improve patient care and for public health officials to strengthen Ecuador’s response to the outbreak.

3 November 2025 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Juan S. Izquierdo-CondoyJuan S. Izquierdo-Condoy
Juan S. Izquierdo-Condoy
Marlon Armando Arias IntriagoMarlon Armando Arias Intriago
Marlon Armando Arias Intriago
ATAndrea Tello-De-La-Torre
Andrea Tello-De-La-Torre
FBFelix Busch
Felix Busch
EOEsteban Ortiz-Prado
Esteban Ortiz-Prado
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) enables the production of coherent and contextually relevant text by processing large-scale linguistic datasets. Tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and LLaMA are increasingly integrated into medical education, assisting students with a range of tasks, including clinical reasoning, literature review, scientific writing, and formative assessment. Although these tools offer significant advantages in terms of productivity, personalization, and cognitive support, their impact on critical thinking—a cornerstone of medical education—remains uncertain. The aim of this viewpoint paper is to critically assess the influence of GenAI on critical thinking within medical training, examining both its potential to enhance cognitive skills and the risks it poses to cognitive autonomy. Users have reported increased efficiency and improved linguistic output; however, concerns have also been raised regarding the risk of cognitive overreliance. Current evidence presents a mixed picture, indicating both improvements in learner engagement and potential drawbacks such as passivity or susceptibility to misinformation. Without curricular integration that prioritizes ethical use, prompt engineering, and critical evaluation, GenAI may compromise the cognitive autonomy of medical students. Conversely, when thoughtfully embedded into pedagogical frameworks, these tools can act as cognitive enhancers—supporting, rather than replacing, clinical reasoning. Medical education must adapt to ensure that future physicians engage with GenAI in a critical, ethical, and context-aware manner, especially in complex decision-making scenarios. This transformation demands not only technological fluency but also reflective practice and sustained oversight by faculty and academic institutions.