M. Estela Peralta

Dr. M. Estela Peralta

Polytechnic School, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 November 2023 in Heliyon
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCarmen Mármol
Carmen Mármol
Amanda Martín-MariscalAmanda Martín-Mariscal
Amanda Martín-Mariscal
APAlberto Picardo
Alberto Picardo
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
The sustainable development goals outlined in the 2030 Agenda encompass a range of global challenges aimed at promoting prosperity and security for both current and future generations. Within this context, the Social Life Cycle Assessment emerges as a valuable tool for assessing the socioeconomic impact assessment associated with the life cycle of industrial products. Despite the presence of a methodological framework with a structured process, the implementation of the Social Life Cycle Assessment within the industrial domain is hampered by the lack of precise indicators, context-specific databases, limited case studies, and the dynamic characteristics inherent in social data. This study conducts a comprehensive review of the scientific literature and examines methodologies, databases, and software, focusing specifically on its applicability in the design and development of industrial products. The main objective is to evaluate the current research effort, identify available technical and digital resources for implementation in industrial companies, and outline key areas of work and specific challenges related to the social dimension of life cycle assessment. The results emphasize the priority of improving indicator frameworks within specific impact categories and developing novel metrics to mitigate uncertainty in decision-making processes. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of transitioning to standardized application procedures within industrial product sectors, thus ensuring methodological consistency and improving the reliability of assessments.

1 January 2017 in Procedia Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ALA. Luque
A. Luque
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
ANA DE LAS HERASANA DE LAS HERAS
ANA DE LAS HERAS
ACA. Córdoba
A. Córdoba

1 August 2019 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlberto Picardo
Alberto Picardo
VSVíctor Soltero
Víctor Soltero
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
FSFundación Investigación de Sevilla
Fundación Investigación de Sevilla

1 January 2017 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
MBMariano Marcos Bárcena
Mariano Marcos Bárcena
FGFrancisco Aguayo González
Francisco Aguayo González

1 October 2020 in Journal of Manufacturing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
VSVíctor Soltero
Víctor Soltero

23 August 2016 in Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
M. Estela PeraltaM. Estela Peralta
M. Estela Peralta
MMMariano Marcos
Mariano Marcos
Aguayo GonzalezAguayo Gonzalez
Aguayo Gonzalez
The studies about sustainable manufacturing engineering (SME) contain an increasing body of knowledge, motivated by the rising interest in the processes lifecycle sustainability. Its continuous improvement and optimization (including sustainability criteria) has become an emerging necessity. For this reason, new clean technologies and proposals of work methods are required; they have to integrate the ecological and social dimensions at an operational level in the manufacturing processes, maintaining the economic and technical feasibility attained up to this moment. However, a unified framework does not exist to orientate the lines of research in optimization when applied to sustainability. In this sense, the article reviews studies from scientific literature about sustainable machining developed in the last 15 years. The review has been carried out from the triple bottom-line (TBL) perspective, defined by the three general sustainability dimensions (economy, ecology, and equity). It contributes to the literature and current machining engineering knowledge, with its involvement in mitigating the metabolic rift. The results from the review have allowed to characterize the investigation effort, with regard to the optimization of the sustainable machining processes; even though numerous studies exist which optimize machining operations (with the aim to find the trade-off between different environmental and equity factors), in general, the technical and economic feasibilities are still the priority. The patterns defined through the analysis of the publications have established the current development trend; furthermore, as a consequence of the review results, we propose an outline of articulated lines of investigation with the aim to mitigate the metabolic rift through triple bottom-line, necessary so that machining engineering assumes the goal of finding the balance to achieve integral sustainability.