Background: Bees encounter a plethora of environmental contaminants during nectar and pollen collection from plants. Consequently, after their entrance into the beehives, the transfer of numerous pollutants to apicultural products is inevitable. Methods: In this context, during the period of 2015–2020, 109 samples of honey, pollen, and beebread were sampled and analyzed for the determination of pesticides and their metabolites. More than 130 analytes were investigated in each sample by applying two validated multiresidue methods (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS). Results: Until the end of 2020, 40 determinations were reported in honey, resulting in a 26% positive to at least one active substance. The concentrations of pesticides ranged from 1.3 ng/g to 785 ng/g honey. For seven active substances in honey and pollen, maximum residue limits (MRLs) exceedances were observed. Coumaphos, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, amitraz metabolites (DMF and DMPF), and tau-fluvalinate were the predominant compounds detected in honey, while several pyrethroids such as λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, and cyfluthrin were also found. Pollen and beebread, as expected, accumulated a higher number of active substances and metabolites (32 in total), exhibiting almost double the number of detections. Conclusions: Although the above findings verify the occurrence of numerous pesticide and metabolite residues in both honey and pollen, the human risk assessment in the majority of the cases does not raise any concerns, and the same applies to bee risk assessment.

Dermal transfer of pesticide residues to human skin due to contact with treated crops, treated surfaces, or contaminated surfaces is an important route of exposure for operators, workers and possibly for bystanders and residents. However, information on dermal transfer data is limited and mainly available for workers. The aim of the present study has been to generate both dermal exposure and transfer data related for operators involved in sequential tasks of mixing/loading and application of pesticides in a southern EU zone greenhouse. Exposure measurements were based on the principles of the whole-body dosimetry (WBD) method involving the use of cotton coveralls and gloves as dosimeters. Six field trials were conducted in three tomato greenhouses, on the island of Crete, Greece. The study results showed that the contribution of existing pesticide deposits on the treated crops, i.e., from an application conducted earlier the same day, was in the range of 8–16% for the application task and 0.9–18% for the mixing/loading task in relation to the measured total exposure to this pesticide during a short-term sequential application. The results of this study have been incorporated in the GAOEM (Greenhouse Agricultural Operator Exposure Model) included in the updated EFSA Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products. The low values of the pesticide amount penetrating the coverall (actual dermal exposure) in all cases highlight and confirm the need for the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for operator safety.

In the frame of a “greener agriculture”, the development of new natural pesticides that are safer than their synthetic counterparts is gaining ground. Nonetheless, the origin of their nature does not necessarily imply their eco-friendliness. Hence, specific ecotoxicological studies are needed, with products being subjected to hazard and consequent risk assessment, for registration purposes. We have previously described on the strong nematicidal activity of Melia azedarach (chinaberry), Petroselinum crispum (parsley) and Eruca sativa (rocket) against the nematode Meloidogyne incognita. With this study the effect of the above-mentioned nematicidal botanicals on Eisenia fetida, Enchytraeus albidus, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio (Zebrafish) is reported, being all model organisms for the study of ecotoxicology of pesticides under registration. The implemented protocols are according to the OECD standards used for the evaluation of formulates under authorization. NOEC values were estimated to be higher than the highest concentrations assessed as recommended by OECD guidelines (≥1000 mg test item/kg dry soil). According to the presented results, all tested botanical nematicidals proved ecofriendly, not hindering the reproduction of juvenile worms of Eisenia fetida, and Enchytraeus albidus. Notably, Petroselinum crispum exhibited beneficial effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida, as the number of juveniles increased. M. azedarach extract demonstrated moderate toxicity to zebrafish embryos (LC₅₀ was 51.41 ± 1.67 mg/L), yet it did not elicit adverse effects on the zebrafish liver. Thus, chinaberry, parsley and rocket are promising to be developed into new “green” nematicides.

Chios mastic gum (CMG), derived from the resin of the Pistacia lentiscus has long been considered a natural remedy in the Mediterranean region. Its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties have garnered increasing attention from scientists and consumers over recent decades. While substantial evidence supports CMG’s efficacy in preventing and treating common health disorders and its potential as a cancer cell inhibitor, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we utilized zebrafish embryos as a model organism to identify molecular pathways modulated by CMG treatment. Embryos were exposed to non-toxic CMG concentrations for 3 to 96 h post-fertilization. LC-HRMS proteomics, combined with enrichment analysis, revealed oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), electron transport chain (ETC), and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) as main processes. The latter highlights the benefits of CMG administration in energy generation and cytoskeletal integrity. From the plethora of identified proteins, hierarchical clustering revealed three main antioxidant proteins as upregulated, namely copper-zinc superoxide dismutase, thioredoxin-disulfide reductase, and catalase, confirming the contribution of CMG to the enhancement of zebrafish’s antioxidant defense.