(1) Background: The suitability of certain food colorings is nowadays in discussion because of the effects of these compounds on human health. For this reason, in the present work, the biological effects of six worldwide used food colorings (Riboflavin, Tartrazine, Carminic Acid, Erythrosine, Indigotine, and Brilliant Blue FCF) were analyzed using two model systems. (2) Methods: In vivo toxicity, antitoxicity, and longevity assays using the model organism Drosophila melanogaster and in vitro cytotoxicity, DNA fragmentation, and methylation status assays using HL-60 tumor human cell line were carried out. (3) Results: Our in vivo results showed safe effects in Drosophila for all the food coloring treatments, non-significant protective potential against an oxidative toxin, and different effects on the lifespan of flies. The in vitro results in HL-60 cells, showed that the tested food colorings increased tumor cell growth but did not induce any DNA damage or modifications in the DNA methylation status at their acceptable daily intake (ADI) concentrations. (4) Conclusions: From the in vivo and in vitro studies, these results would support the idea that a high chronic intake of food colorings throughout the entire life is not advisable.

Although many benefits drawn from beer consumption are claimed, the epidemiological records are contradictory with respect to cancer prevention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible health-related activities involving genome safety and the ageing processes of two types of lyophilised ale beers (blond and stout), as well as two of their bioactive compounds (tyrosol and iso-alpha humulone). A multipurpose trial set of in vivo toxicity, antitoxicity, mutagenicity, antimutagenicity, lifespan and healthspan assays using Drosophila melanogaster were used. In parallel, several in vitro assays were designed using the cancer cell line HL-60 in order to establish the possible chemopreventive activity of the selected substances, where epigenetic modulation of DNA methylation changes, clastogenic activity and tumour cell inhibition growth were evaluated. The safety of the four substances was confirmed: lyophilised blond ale beer (LBAB), lyophilised stout ale beer (LSAB), tyrosol and iso-alpha humulone were neither toxic nor genotoxic. Moreover, all substances, except tyrosol, revealed the ability to protect individual genomes against oxidative radicals and to exert antimutagenic activity against the genotoxin hydrogen peroxide. With respect to the degenerative process indicators of lifespan and healthspan, tyrosol was the only compound that did not exert any influence on the life extension of Drosophila; LBAB induced a significant lifespan extension in D. melanogaster; LSAB and its distinctive compound iso-alpha humulone induced a reduction in longevity. The in vitro assays showed the cytotoxic activity of LBAB, LSAB and tyrosol against HL-60 cells. Moreover, proapoptotic DNA fragmentation or DNA strand breakage was observed for both types of beers and iso-alpha humulone at different concentrations. Furthermore, the lyophilised ale beers and tyrosol exhibited an increasing genome-wide methylation status, while iso-alpha humulone exhibited a demethylation status in repetitive cancer cell sequences. Although the biological activities assigned to beer consumption cannot be linked to any specific molecule/element due to the complexity of the phenolic profile, as well as the multifactor brewing process, the results obtained let us propose lyophilised ale beers as safe potential nutraceutical beverages when consumed in moderate amounts. The prevention of toxicity and genetic oxidative damage, as well as the induction of tumor cell death and modulation of the methylation status, are the key activities of beer that were shown in the present research.

Background: Czech beers are unique because they are brewed using specific technology at a particular latitude and for being entirely produced in the area of the Czech Republic. The purpose of this work is the evaluation of toxicological effects of a variety of freeze-dried Czech beers, their raw materials (malts, hops and yeast) and processed-beer (wort, hopped wort and young beer). Methods: In vivo assays to evaluate the safety and protective effects in the Drosophila melanogaster eukaryotic system, and the in vitro evaluations of chemopreventive and DNA damage activity using the HL-60 tumour human cell line were carried out. Results: The safe effects for all the analysed substances and general protective effects against H₂O₂ were shown both at the individual and genomic level in the Drosophila animal model, with some exceptions. Moreover, all the substances were able to inhibit the tumour cell growth and to induce DNA damage in the HL-60 cells at different levels (proapoptotic, single/double strands breaks and methylation status). Conclusions: The promising effects shown by freeze-dried Czech beers due to their safety, protection against a toxin, chemopreventive potential and the induction of DNA damage in tumour cells, allow the proposition of Czech beer as a beverage with nutraceutic potential.

(1) Background: Advances in food processing practices and health care are some of the most significant advances in modern daily life. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety of potassium and sodium nitrates and nitrites when they are used as fertilizers in agriculture and food additives, as well as the known conversion of nitrate to nitrite in humans. (2) Methods: Various bioassays were conducted to investigate the effects of nitrates and nitrites in the Drosophila melanogaster genetic tester system. These assays focused on the modulation of degenerative processes at the molecular, cellular, individual, and population levels. Additionally, we assessed the chemopreventive potential and the ability to induce DNA strand breaks in HL-60 tumour cells. (3) Results: All nitrate and nitrite concentrations tested were shown to not be toxic or genotoxic in Drosophila since none of the compounds reached the LD₅₀ and significant genetic mutation. A positive or null protective capacity against a toxic agent was found for nitrates, not for nitrites, showing that sodium nitrite has a synergistic effect when combined with the oxidant toxin hydrogen peroxide; and a nutraceutical potential in the lifespan only for sodium nitrate to improve the quality of life in 5 days at ADI concentration. The in vitro results in human leukemia cells showed a chemopreventive potential only for potassium nitrate and sodium nitrite due to reducing the viability of HL-60 cells growth to 18% and 29%, respectively, compared to the controls at ADI (acceptable daily intake) concentrations. However, neither of these showed DNA damage or methylation modifications. (4) Conclusions: The tested compounds were shown to be safe to use during in vivo and in vitro tests when used at the extrapolated ADI concentrations.

The controversial results of research on monosodium glutamate demand a new data corpus for the overall safety evaluation. Both animal and cellular model systems have been used to add a multilevel scope on its biological effects. The Drosophila melanogaster animal model has been used to test a wide range of concentrations for safety purposes: toxicity, genotoxicity, longevity and health span. Medium concentrations corresponding to the human acceptable daily intake (ADI) (0.06 mg/mL) were not toxic nor genotoxic for Drosophila and safe for the lifespan parameters. Once safety was determined, the possible nutraceutical effects of monosodium glutamate was monitored in terms of antitoxicity, antigenotoxicity assays and health span. The results for protective activity against hydrogen peroxide were positive in terms of the medium concentration, antitoxic and antigenotoxic in terms of inhibiting the genotoxicity induced by the oxidative toxin up to 43.7% and increasing the health span expectancy by 32% in terms of days. Monosodium glutamate has been demonstrated to be cytotoxic against the model tumour cell line HL-60, not only in a necrotic way but through internucleosomal DNA fragmentation antitumour activity. The significant LINE1 DNA sequence methylation of HL-60 tumour cells induced by monosodium glutamate is a molecular marker for chemoprevention. Conclusions: the slight or non-significant positive nutraceutical and chemo preventive potential showed by monosodium glutamate at its ADI concentration can be considered as a safe dose for a moderate consumption.