Madeline Rocks

Ms. Madeline Rocks

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2024 in HAND
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMatthew V. Abola
Matthew V. Abola
BGBrett A. Gerber
Brett A. Gerber
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
JCJeffrey S. Chen
Jeffrey S. Chen
JHJacques H. Hacquebord
Jacques H. Hacquebord
AAAli Azad
Ali Azad
Background: Perilunate dislocations (PLD) and fracture-dislocations (PLFD) comprise a spectrum of high-energy wrist injuries. The purpose of this review was to review operative strategies for perilunate injuries based on approach and compare outcomes. Methods: A systematic review of literature on PLD and fracture-dislocations was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried for literature. Inclusion criteria included English studies reporting clinical or functional outcomes of acute PLD and PLFD. Results: Twenty-nine full-text articles (604 PLD and PLFD injuries) were included. The most common method of PLD and PLFD fixation is through an open approach with combined volar and dorsal exposure. There were no differences between approaches with regard to total arc range of motion, grip strength, Mayo Wrist Score, or mean scapholunate angle. Similarly, there was no difference between approaches and postoperative radiographic arthritis or complications. Most patients were able to return to their prior level of function and work. The incidence of postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 22.5%. Conclusion: Current evidence shows no difference in postoperative total wrist arc range of motion, grip strength (as compared to contralateral), or Mayo Wrist Score with regard to surgical approach. The most common method of PLD and PLFD fixation in the literature is through an open approach with combined volar and dorsal exposure. There is a large difference in reported rates of radiographic arthritis, although this finding does not appear to correlate with postoperative pain or disability. Level of Evidence: I, Systematic Review.

16 May 2023 in HAND
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJared Bookman
Jared Bookman
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
KNKaren Noh
Karen Noh
OAOmri Ayalon
Omri Ayalon
JHJacques Hacquebord
Jacques Hacquebord
SGSteven Glickel
Steven Glickel
Background: Corticosteroid injection is the mainstay of nonoperative treatment for trigger finger (stenosing tenosynovitis), but despite substantial experience with this treatment, there is minimal available evidence as to the optimal corticosteroid dosing. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 3 different injection dosages of triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of trigger finger. Methods: Patients diagnosed with a trigger finger were prospectively enrolled and treated with an initial triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog) injection of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg. Patients were followed longitudinally over a 6-month period. Patients were assessed for duration of clinical response, clinical failure, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. Results: A total of 146 patients (163 trigger fingers) were enrolled over a 26-month period. At 6-month follow-up, injections were still effective (without recurrence, secondary injection, or surgery) in 52% of the 5-mg group, 62% of the 10-mg group, and 79% of the 20-mg group. Visual Analog Scale at final follow-up improved by 2.2 in the 5-mg group, 2.7 in the 10-mg group, and 4.5 in the 20-mg group. The QuickDASH scores at final follow-up improved by 11.8 in the 5-mg group, 21.5 in the 10-mg group, and 28.9 in the 20-mg group. Conclusions: Minimal evidence exists to guide the optimal dosing of steroid injection in trigger digits. When compared with 5-mg and 10-mg doses, a 20-mg dose was found to have a significantly higher rate of clinical effectiveness at 6-month follow-up. The VAS and QuickDASH scores were not significantly different between the 3 groups.

21 October 2023 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
AZAmy Y. Zhao
Amy Y. Zhao
ILIvan Z. Liu
Ivan Z. Liu
AAAmil R. Agarwal
Amil R. Agarwal
AHAndrew B. Harris
Andrew B. Harris
STSavyasachi C. Thakkar
Savyasachi C. Thakkar

9 July 2022 in HAND
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
MDMegan R. Donnelly
Megan R. Donnelly
ALAlexander Li
Alexander Li
SGSteven Z. Glickel
Steven Z. Glickel
LCLouis W. Catalano
Louis W. Catalano
JHJacques H. Hacquebord
Jacques H. Hacquebord
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic differences of the most common peripheral nerve compressions in the upper extremity—carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar nerve compression (UNC) at the elbow, combined CTS and UNC, radial tunnel syndrome (RTS), and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS)—as a means to better understand the etiologies of each. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients over the age of 18 years seen at our institution in the 2018 calendar year. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients with diagnoses of upper extremity peripheral nerve compressions. Demographic details and relevant comorbidities were recorded for each patient and compared with controls, who were seen the same calendar year with no neuropathies. χ2 analyses, independent-samples t tests, and multivariate logistic regressions were performed ( P < .05). Results: A total of 7448 patients were identified. Those with CTS were mainly women, former smokers, and diabetic (all P < .001) and with a greater average body mass index (BMI) ( P = .006) than controls. Patients with UNC were more often men and younger when compared with controls (both P < .001). A history of smoking, diabetes, and average BMI were similar between patients with UNC and controls (all P > .05). Those patients with combined CTS/UNC were mainly men, former smokers, and diabetic (all P < .001) when compared with controls. Patients with RTS/PINS were also mostly men ( P = .007), diabetic ( P = .042), and were more often current smokers ( P < .001). Conclusions: The demographics of patients with various compressive neuropathies were not homogeneous, suggesting different etiologies.

3 November 2022 in The Journal of Hand Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDevon Ryan
Devon Ryan
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
KNKaren Noh
Karen Noh
HHHeero Hacquebord
Heero Hacquebord
JHJacques Hacquebord
Jacques Hacquebord

3 October 2024 in Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRMadeline Rocks
Madeline Rocks
MWMeagan Wu
Meagan Wu
VCVictoria Comunale
Victoria Comunale
NANikhil Agrawal
Nikhil Agrawal
RNRebecca S. Nicholas
Rebecca S. Nicholas
JHJacques Henri Hacquebord
Jacques Henri Hacquebord
Background While prior studies have recommended immediate flap coverage within 72 hours of injury for soft tissue reconstruction for traumatic extremity injuries, recent evidence in the setting of advanced wound care techniques de-emphasizes the need for immediate coverage. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been an essential tool for extending the time to definitive soft tissue coverage. This study sought to elucidate the impact of preoperative NPWT use on the success of microsurgical reconstruction. Methods A literature search was conducted using the following databases from their inception up to February 2023: PubMed, OVID databases (Embase and Cochrane Library), Web of Science, and Scopus. Of 801 identified articles, 648 were assessed and 24 were included. Cases were divided based on whether NPWT was used preoperatively or not. Timing to definitive coverage, injury details, and basic demographics were recorded. Rates of flap failure, infection, bone nonunion, reoperation, and complications were compared between groups. Results A total of 1,027 patients and 1,047 flaps were included, of which 894 (85.39%) received preflap NPWT. The average time to definitive coverage for the NPWT and non-NPWT groups was 16 and 18 days, respectively. The NPWT group experienced lower postoperative complication rates than the non-NPWT group in all reported complications except for deep infections. Compared with the non-NPWT group, the NPWT group experienced lower rates of any flap failure (3.69 vs. 9.80%) and partial flap failure (2.24 vs. 6.54%). Conclusion Preoperative NPWT was associated with reduced postoperative complications, most importantly flap failure rates. This merits further investigation into the decision-making process for traumatic extremity reconstruction. Future prospective studies adopting standardized protocols with longer follow-up are required to better understand the potentially beneficial role of preoperative NPWT use in soft tissue reconstruction.