Oxidative stress (OS) is an established hallmark of cancer and neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs), which contributes to genomic instability and neuronal loss. This review explores the contrasting role of OS in cancer stem cells (CSCs) and NDDs. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to genomic instability and promote tumor initiation and progression in CSCs, while in NDDs such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, OS accelerates neuronal death and impairs cellular repair mechanisms. Both scenarios involve disruption of the delicate balance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant systems, which leads to chronic oxidative stress. Notably, CSCs and neurons display alterations in redox-sensitive signaling pathways, including Nrf2 and NF-κB, which influence cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation. Mitochondrial dynamics further illustrate these differences: enhanced function in CSCs supports adaptability and survival, whereas impairments in neurons heighten vulnerability. Understanding these common mechanisms of OS-induced redox imbalance may provide insights for developing interventions, addressing aging hallmarks, and potentially mitigating or preventing both cancer and NDDs.
Neurodegeneration and cancer are fundamentally distinct disorders: one signifies gradual neuronal loss while the latter signifies uncontrolled cell growth and survival. However, emerging evidence explores an inverse association between these conditions, suggesting that they do not arise from independent biological processes. Understanding the context-dependent behaviour of major pathways (for example, p53, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt, and immune–stress signaling) remains pivotal in elucidating the relationship between these two diseases. Pathways promoting early-life fitness, tissue repair, and tumor suppression in dividing cells can become detrimental later in life for post-mitotic neurons. Cross-species genomics studies reveal how evolution has repeatedly adapted these shared networks to balance cancer resistance with survival. Research on species exhibiting exceptional longevity and disease resistance, including naked mole rats and bowhead whales, shows that cancer resistance and longevity are not fixed traits but rather are controlled by precise regulatory mechanisms. In this review, we integrate insights from broad species genomics and multi-omic and single-cell studies to understand how evolutionarily conserved molecular crosstalks diverge at the interface of cancer and neurodegeneration.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder with limited effective therapies. In this study, a series of 2-(arylamino)thiazol-4(5H)-one derivatives was synthesized using an efficient microwave-assisted protocol, and evaluated for neuroprotective effects against 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced oxidative stress (OS) in SH-SY5Y neuronal cells and an Aβ42-expressing Drosophila melanogaster model of AD. Among the synthesized compounds, 3n, 3i, and 3b exhibited low cytotoxicity and significant neuroprotection, as evidenced by increased cell viability, reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and preserved mitochondrial membrane potential. Notably, compound 3n demonstrated the highest activity and effectively ameliorated Aβ42-induced behavioral deficits in vivo. Molecular docking studies predicted favorable binding affinity within the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) active site, with the thiazol scaffold and aryl substituents stabilizing ligand binding through π–π stacking and hydrophobic interactions; compound 3n also formed additional hydrogen bonds enhancing its affinity. Consistent with the docking predictions, in vitro AChE inhibition studies demonstrated that compounds 3n, 3i, and 3b inhibited AChE in a concentration-dependent manner. Network pharmacology predicted seven potential core targets implicated in AD pathogenesis and related pathways, including OS, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. Furthermore, in silico pharmacokinetic analysis indicated compliance with Lipinski’s and Veber’s rules, supporting favorable drug-like properties. While further experimental validation is essential, these findings highlight 2-(arylamino)thiazol-4(5H)-one derivatives, particularly compound 3n, as promising multifunctional candidates for further preclinical development against AD.