Typically, textual information is available as unstructured data, which require processing so that data mining algorithms can handle such data; this processing is known as the pre-processing step in the overall text mining process. This paper aims at analyzing the strong impact that the pre-processing step has on most mining tasks. Therefore, we propose a methodology to vary distinct combinations of pre-processing steps and to analyze which pre-processing combination allows high precision. In order to show different combinations of pre-processing methods, experiments were performed by comparing some combinations such as stemming, term weighting, term elimination based on low frequency cut and stop words elimination. These combinations were applied in text and opinion mining tasks, from which correct classification rates were computed to highlight the strong impact of the pre-processing combinations. Additionally, we provide graphical representations from each pre-processing combination to show how visual approaches are useful to show the processing effects on document similarities and group formation (i.e., cohesion and separation).
For a long time, data has been treated as a general problem because it just represents fractions of an event without any relevant purpose. However, the last decade has been just about information and how to get it. Seeking meaning in data and trying to solve scalability problems, many frameworks have been developed to improve data storage and its analysis. As a framework, Hadoop was presented as a powerful tool to deal with large amounts of data. However, it still causes doubts about how to deal with its deployment and if there is any reliable method to compare the performance of distinct Hadoop clusters. This paper presents a methodology based on benchmark analysis to guide the Hadoop cluster deployment. The experiments employed The Apache Hadoop and the Hadoop distributions of Cloudera, Hortonworks, and MapR, analyzing the architectures on local and on clouding—using centralized and geographically distributed servers. The results show the methodology can be dynamically applied on a reliable comparison among different architectures. Additionally, the study suggests that the knowledge acquired can be used to improve the data analysis process by understanding the Hadoop architecture.