Khaled khaled Alebrahim

Prof. Dr. Khaled khaled Alebrahim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 October 2021 in Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EAEbrahim Khaled Al-Ebrahim
Ebrahim Khaled Al-Ebrahim
TMTurki Abdullah Madani
Turki Abdullah Madani
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim

1 January 2020 in The Heart Surgery Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim
EAEbrahim Khaled Al-Ebrahim
Ebrahim Khaled Al-Ebrahim
Sternal wound complications are significant problems in cardiac surgery and cause challenges to surgeons as they are associated with high mortality, morbidity, and a tremendous load on the hospital budget. Risk factors and preventive measures against sternal wound infection need to be in focus. Classification of different types of sternotomy complications post cardiac surgery is important for specific categorization and management. Reviewing the literature, a variety of classifications was introduced to help understand the pathophysiology of these wounds and how best to manage them. Initial classifications were based on the postoperative period of the infectious process and risk factors. Recently, the anatomical description of sternal wound, including the depth and location, was shown to be more practical. There is a lack of evidence-based surgical consensus for the appropriate management strategy, including type of closure, choice of sternal coverage post sternectomy, whether primary, delayed and when to use reconstructive flaps.

7 July 2022 in The Heart Surgery Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKhalid Almramhi
Khalid Almramhi
MAMohammed Aljehani
Mohammed Aljehani
MBMohammed Bamuflih
Mohammed Bamuflih
SASaad Alghamdi
Saad Alghamdi
SBSultan Banser
Sultan Banser
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim
Background: Unplanned 30-day readmission post-cardiac surgery imposes higher risks for complications, increased costs, and unfavorable events for the care provider and patient. This study was to determine the unplanned readmission rate, determinants, and most common events within 30 days post-cardiac surgery. Recommendations to prevent or minimize these complications are included. Methods: Setting and design – a retrospective record review was conducted among all adult patients, who underwent open heart surgery between 2010 and 2020 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Using Google Forms, we manually collected data from hospital records. Statistical analysis used: binomial logistic regression model (using the backward stepwise method). Regression outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. A P-value of < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Results: Among 400 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, 343 patients were included in the study, including 53 unplanned readmissions, which was a rate of 16.3% (95% CI, 12.8 to 20.6%). The most frequently reported reasons for readmission were sternal wound infections (7.3%), pleural effusion (2.0%), and heart failure (1.7%). Female gender, high postoperative LDH and urea were the most important risk factors. Conclusion: Discharge planning, patient education, and cardiac surgery nurse home visit constitute the most important factors to minimize 30 days of unplanned readmission.

1 August 2010 in Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHusain Jabbad
Husain Jabbad
RSRajab Shehata
Rajab Shehata
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim
We describe direct repair of congenital complete sternal cleft in a 35-year-old woman, using titanium plates fixed by pre-drilled screws to the manubrium and costal cartilages. This provided excellent protective and cosmetic results.

27 June 2019 in Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim
AEAhmed Abdelrahman Elassal
Ahmed Abdelrahman Elassal
OEOsama Saber Eldib
Osama Saber Eldib
AAAhmed Hassan Abdelsalam Abdalla
Ahmed Hassan Abdelsalam Abdalla
AAAmr Ragab Abdelaty Allam
Amr Ragab Abdelaty Allam
OAOsman Osama Al-Radi
Osman Osama Al-Radi
Background: Important differences in the mechanism of respiration between adults and children warrant distinction in the management of diaphragmatic paralysis as a complication of cardiac surgery. We describe the management and outcomes of this complication in both groups. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients (5 adults and 11 children) with diaphragmatic paralysis after cardiac surgery performed between 2008 and 2018. Clinical examination, chest radiography, and confirmation with fluoroscopy in selected cases were our modalities of diagnosis. All adults were managed conservatively, whereas plication was performed in all children. Results: The incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis was 0.98% in pediatric patients and 0.43% in adults. The mean age was 2.33 ± 2.59 years in children and 53.2 ± 17.99 years in adults. All adults were symptomatic. All children showed difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. The period of mechanical ventilation before plication was 2–6 days (median 4 days). Death occurred as a result of low cardiac output in a 10-year-old boy, and due to respiratory failure in a 30-year-old woman. Children were successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation after diaphragmatic plication. The median time to extubation after plication was 2.5 days (range 1–13 days). The median period of recovery in adults was 52 days (range 32–85 days). All survivors had acceptable outcomes at 6 months to one year. Conclusion: Conservative management in adults and early plication in children are viable treatment options for diaphragmatic palsy after cardiac surgery, with acceptable outcomes.

3 August 2020 in The Heart Surgery Forum
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAhmed Abdelrahman Elassal
Ahmed Abdelrahman Elassal
KAKhaled khaled Alebrahim
Khaled khaled Alebrahim
OAOsman O. Al-Radi
Osman O. Al-Radi
ZZZaher Faisal Zaher
Zaher Faisal Zaher
ADAhmed Mohamed Dohain
Ahmed Mohamed Dohain
OEOsama Eldib
Osama Eldib
Background: St. Thomas (ST) and Del Nido (DN) cardioplegic solutions are widely used for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. In 2016, our university hospital shifted from modified St. Thomas to Del Nido solution for both adult and pediatric cardiac surgery. This retrospective study was conducted to compare ST and DN solutions regarding surgical workflow and clinical outcome in pediatric and adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: We reviewed 220 patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring cardioplegic arrest. Patients were categorized in 2 groups: ST (n = 110) and DN (n = 110). Each group included 60 pediatric and 50 adult patients. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. Results: In pediatric patients, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding clamping time, bypass time, need for defibrillation, inotropic score, postoperative ejection fraction (EF), period of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, or postoperative arrhythmias. One patient in the ST group required mechanical support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We had 5 cases of pediatric mortality (3 in DN and 2 in ST, P = .64). In adult patients, significantly fewer patients in the DN group needed defibrillation than in the ST group. No significant difference was found regarding clamping time, inotropic score, or intraaortic balloon pump use. Mortality in adult patients was 6 cases (4 in ST group and 2 in DN group). Conclusion: DN cardioplegia solution is as safe as ST solution in pediatric and adult cardiac surgery. It has comparable results of myocardial protection and clinical outcome, with superiority regarding uninterrupted surgery and lower rate of defibrillation.