Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the liver's most common primary malignancy, with over half a million new cases diagnosed each year and being the fourth leading cause of cancer death, worldwide. The poor prognosis of HCC is largely related to late diagnosis. Historically, serum alpha-fetoprotein and diagnostic imaging have been primary diagnostic modalities. However, the poor prognosis due to late diagnosis of HCC has proven unacceptable and, recently, significant efforts have been devoted to identifying patients with early stage HCC. Molecular biomarkers can provide additional and relevant information about the biological behavior of these tumors. Research in biomarker combinations may provide more accurate and valuable information for the future individualized HCC diagnosis and/or prognosis. Several biomarkers with prognostic significance have been identified, however all of them have been studied retrospectively. Furthermore, of all different molecular signatures that have been published, very few have been externally validated. The aim of this review is to analyze the most relevant emerging biomarkers of HCC.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Domino LT (DLT) using the “Double Piggy-back” technique. Background data: DLT using livers from familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) patients is a well-described technique and useful for expanding the donor pool. However, data on long-term results for HCC are limited, particularly regarding the use of the “Double Piggy-back” technique. Methods: Between 2001 and 2014, a total of 260 patients undergoing LT for HCC were analyzed from a prospective database. Of those, 114 were submitted to DLT. Comparisons between groups were performed using propensity score matching. Results: Median follow-up was 34 months (1–152). Overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates for the whole population were 58% and 56%, respectively. There were 177 (68%) patients within Milan Criteria and an additional 26 (10%) within University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria. Patients older than 50 years were more likely to receive an FAP liver [odds ratio (OR) 1.94, confidence interval (CI) 1.02–3.69]. DLT patients had more major complications (23.7% vs 13.0%, P = 0.025). Only patients undergoing DLT presented with piggy-back syndrome (7% vs 0%, P = 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, DLT and cadaveric LT had a similar 5-year survival rate (59% vs 44%, respectively, P = 0.117). Thirteen patients (11.4%) evidenced FAP disease but not before 6 years after DLT. Conclusions: DLT for HCC is feasible and achieves equivalent results to cadaveric LT. The benefit of expanding the donor pool must be balanced against higher morbidity and a real risk of disease transmission.