The contribution of veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to systemic oxygen delivery is determined by the ratio of total extracorporeal blood flow ( ) to cardiac output ( ). Thermodilution-based measurements of may be compromised by blood recirculating through the ECMO (recirculation fraction; Rf). We measured the effects of and Rf on classic thermodilution-based measurements of in six anesthetized pigs. An ultrasound flow probe measured total aortic blood flow ( ) at the aortic root. Rf was quantified with the ultrasound dilution technique. was set to 0–125% of and was measured using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in healthy and lung injured animals. PAC overestimated ( ) at all settings compared to . The mean bias between both methods was 2.1 L/min in healthy animals and 2.7 L/min after lung injury. The difference between and increased with an of 75–125%/ compared to Q_EC <50%/ . Overestimation of was highest when resulted in a high Rf. Thus, thermodilution-based measurements can overestimate cardiac output during VV ECMO. The degree of overestimation of depends on the _EC/ ratio and the recirculation fraction.

Various animal models of lung injury exist to study the complex pathomechanisms of human acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and evaluate future therapies. Severe lung injury with a reproducible deterioration of pulmonary gas exchange and hemodynamics can be induced in anesthetized pigs using repeated lung lavages with warmed 0.9% saline (50 ml/kg body weight). Including standard respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring with clinically applied devices in this model allows the evaluation of novel therapeutic strategies (drugs, modern ventilators, extracorporeal membrane oxygenators, ECMO), and bridges the gap between bench and bedside. Furthermore, induction of lung injury with lung lavages does not require the injection of pathogens/endotoxins that impact on measurements of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. A disadvantage of the model is the high recruitability of atelectatic lung tissue. Standardization of the model helps to avoid pitfalls, to ensure comparability between experiments, and to reduce the number of animals needed.

Animal data strongly support a role for inflammation in myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. Attempts at cardioprotection by immunomodulation (such as with the specific C5 antibody pexelizumab) in humans have been disappointing. We hypothesized that a broader spectrum antiinflammatory agent might yield successful cardioprotection. The serine protease inhibitor nafamostat (FUT-175), which is already in clinical use, is a potent antiinflammatory synthetic serine protease inhibitor with anticomplement activity that we tested in a well-established rabbit model of 1 hour of myocardial ischemia followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. Compared to vehicle-treated animals, nafamostat (1 mg/kg of body weight) administered 5 minutes before reperfusion significantly reduced myocardial injury assessed by plasma creatine kinase activity (38.1 ± 6.0 versus 57.9 ± 3.7I U/g protein; P < 0.05) and myocardial necrosis (23.6 ± 3.1% versus 35.7 ± 1.0%; P < 0.05) as well as myocardial leukocyte accumulation (P < 0.05). In parallel in vitro studies, Nafamostat was a significantly more potent broad spectrum complement suppressor than C1 inhibitor. Nafamostat appears to have capability as an inhibitor of both complement pathways and as a broad-spectrum antiinflammatory agent by virtue of its serine protease inhibition. Administration of nafamostat before myocardial reperfusion after ischemia produced significant, dose-dependant cardioprotection. Reduced leukocyte accumulation and complement activity seem involved in the mechanism of this cardioprotective effect.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the ICU survival of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients suffering from COVID-19–related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus ECMO patients without COVID-19 (non-COVID-19)–related ARDS. DESIGN: Preliminary analysis of data from two prospective ECMO trials and retrospective analysis of a cohort of ARDS ECMO patients. SETTING: Single-center ICU. PATIENTS: Adult ARDS ECMO patients, 16 COVID-19 versus 23 non-COVID-19 patients. Analysis of retrospective data from 346 adult ARDS ECMO patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients did not differ with respect to preexisting disease or body mass index. ICU survival rate was 62% for COVID-19 ECMO patients and 70% for non-COVID-19 ECMO patients. COVID-19 ECMO survivors were supported with ECMO for a median of 43 days (interquartile range [IQR], 18–58 d) versus 16 days (IQR, 19–39 d; p = 0.03) for non-COVID-19 patients. The median duration of ECMO therapy for all ARDS patients between 2007 and 2018 was 15 days (IQR, 6–28 d). The subgroup of patients suffering from any viral pneumonia received ECMO support for a median of 16 days (IQR, 9–27 d), survivors of influenza pneumonia received ECMO support for 13 days (IQR, 7–25 d). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients required significant longer ECMO support compared with patients without COVID-19 to achieve successful ECMO weaning and ICU survival.