Pratik Chattopadhyay

Dr. Pratik Chattopadhyay


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2025 in Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YWYaoli Wang
Yaoli Wang
YDYaojun Deng
Yaojun Deng
Yuanjin ZhengYuanjin Zheng
Yuanjin Zheng
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
Lipo WangLipo Wang
Lipo Wang
Transformers were initially introduced for natural language processing, leveraging the self-attention mechanism. They require minimal inductive biases in their design and can function effectively as set-based architectures. Additionally, transformers excel at capturing long-range dependencies and enabling parallel processing, which allows them to outperform traditional models, such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, on sequence-based tasks. In recent years, transformers have been widely adopted in computer vision, driving remarkable advancements in the field. Previous surveys have provided overviews of transformer applications across various computer vision tasks, such as object detection, activity recognition, and image enhancement. In this survey, we focus specifically on image classification. We begin with an introduction to the fundamental concepts of transformers and highlight the first successful Vision Transformer (ViT). Building on the ViT, we review subsequent improvements and optimizations introduced for image classification tasks. We then compare the strengths and limitations of these transformer-based models against classic convolutional neural networks (CNNs) through experiments. Finally, we explore key challenges and potential future directions for image classification transformers.

23 August 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
Lipo WangLipo Wang
Lipo Wang
YTYap-Peng Tan
Yap-Peng Tan
An insider threat scenario refers to the outcome of a set of malicious activities caused by intentional or unintentional misuse of the organization's systems, networks, data, and resources. Prevention of insider threat is difficult, since trusted partners of the organization are involved in it, who have authorized access to these confidential/sensitive resources. The state-of-the-art research on insider threat detection mostly focuses on developing unsupervised behavioral anomaly detection techniques with the objective of finding out anomalousness or abnormal changes in user behavior over time. However, an anomalous activity is not necessarily malicious that can lead to an insider threat scenario. As an improvement to the existing approaches, we propose a technique for insider threat detection from time-series classification of user activities. Initially, a set of single-day features is computed from the user activity logs. A time-series feature vector is next constructed from the statistics of each single-day feature over a period of time. The label of each time-series feature vector (whether malicious or nonmalicious) is extracted from the ground truth. To classify the imbalanced ground-truth insider threat data consisting of only a small number of malicious instances, we employ a cost-sensitive data adjustment technique that undersamples the nonmalicious class instances randomly. As a classifier, we employ a two-layered deep autoencoder neural network and compare its performance with other popularly used classifiers: random forest and multilayer perceptron. Encouraging results are obtained by evaluating our approach using the CMU Insider Threat Data, which is the only publicly available insider threat data set consisting of about 14-GB web-browsing logs, along with logon, device connection, file transfer, and e-mail log files. We observe that both deep autoencoder and random forest classifiers classify the dataadjusted time-series feature set with high precision, recall, and f-score. Although multilayer perceptron has a high recall, it suffers from a lower precision and f-score compared to the other two classifiers.

5 June 2024 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAadarsh Kumar Singh
Aadarsh Kumar Singh
ARAkhil Rao
Akhil Rao
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
RMRahul Maurya
Rahul Maurya
LSLokesh Singh
Lokesh Singh

21 March 2023 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPreetam Pal
Preetam Pal
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
MSMayank Swarnkar
Mayank Swarnkar

27 November 2020 in Signal, Image and Video Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAyush Agarwal
Ayush Agarwal
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
Lipo WangLipo Wang
Lipo Wang

11 January 2024 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSomnath Sendhil Kumar
Somnath Sendhil Kumar
BSBinit Singh
Binit Singh
PCPratik Chattopadhyay
Pratik Chattopadhyay
AHAgrya Halder
Agrya Halder
LWLipo Wang
Lipo Wang