The classical approach for the preparation of an endodontically treated molar with a post and core involves widening the anatomically complex system of canals, which may be narrow or curved with variable angulation. The aforementioned along with the fact that restorative dentistry stands against the wastage of tooth tissue make endocrowns an appealing alternative. Bindl and Mörmann first described an all-ceramic crown anchored to the internal portion of the pulp chamber and on the cavity margins, thus obtaining macromechanical retention provided by the axial opposing pulpal walls and microretention attained with the use of adhesive cementation. The purpose of this report is to describe the protocol for the treatment plan selection, preparation, impression, and adhesive cementation of an endocrown with a follow-up of 5 years. A 56-year-old male patient presented to the Postgraduate Clinic of Prosthodontics seeking rehabilitation for tooth No. #36. A clinical examination revealed multiple immediate composite resin restorations with unacceptable morphology and adaptation to the remaining tooth as well as a lack of a contact point but, rather, a large, concave contact area facilitating food entrapment. Since the tooth was endodontically treated, the proposed treatment plan included the fabrication of an all-ceramic endocrown. The steps of preparation, attribution of the correct shape, impression, and adhesive luting under rubber dam isolation are thoroughly described. The final functional and aesthetic result, patient’s satisfaction, and the 5-year follow-up render restorations such as endocrowns, which draw their retention from adhesive luting, a viable alternative to conventional approaches.