Objective: To examine the effects of a six-week body weight-support treadmill training (BWSTT) program on center-of-mass control and gait independence in chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) patients. Design: Descriptive. Setting: Clinica Los Coihues. Neurorehabilitation center in Santiago, Chile. Participants: 17 chronic iSCI patients and 17 healthy subjects. Outcome Measures: An instrumented sway (ISway) test was performed before and after the implementation of a six-week BWSTT program. The standing balance of participants was measured by Normalized jerk (NJ) and root mean square (RMS). These values were used to assess the standing balance of participants, and were correlated with the scores obtained on the Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) II test. Results: Significant differences were found in standing balance (i.e., through NJ) after the BWSTT program (P = 0.016), but no significant differences were found in RMS values for postural sway (P = 0.693). None of the patients obtained improved WISCI II scores pre- vs. post-intervention. Conclusion: While a BWSTT program can improve center-of-mass control in iSCI patients, no effects were recorded for gait independence. Trial Registration: National Clinical Trials, registry number NCT02703883.

Background: Rehabilitation is a critical process for enhancing functionality, independence, and quality of life in individuals with disabilities. Grounded in the biopsychosocial model, it addresses physical, emotional, and social dimensions through personalized, evidence-based interventions. By integrating standardized assessments and continuous evaluation, rehabilitation has the potential to promote recovery and support active participation in society. Objectives: This study evaluated the impact of a long-term, multidisciplinary, home-based rehabilitation program on quality of life, balance, and functional autonomy in adults with neuromusculoskeletal disabilities. Methods: A total of 559 participants received individualized interventions from a team of physical therapists, occupational therapists, psychologists, and other health professionals. Functional independence, balance, depressive symptoms, and quality of life were assessed using the Barthel Index, Berg Balance Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and SF-36 questionnaire, respectively. Results: A longitudinal analysis comparing pre- and post-intervention outcomes revealed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) across all metrics. The Barthel Index median increased from 85 to 90 points, indicating greater functional independence, while the Berg Balance Scale improved from 39 to 47 points, reflecting reduced fall risk. Depressive symptoms decreased, with Beck Depression Inventory scores dropping from 12 to 9, and both physical and mental health components of the SF-36 showed marked enhancements. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the program’s effectiveness in addressing both physical and emotional needs, emphasizing the value of extended, personalized, home-based care in improving health, autonomy, and overall quality of life for individuals with disabilities. This study underscores the potential of multidisciplinary approaches to support long-term rehabilitation in diverse populations.

One emerging method in home stroke rehabilitation is digital technology. However, existing approaches typically target one domain (e.g., upper limb). Moreover, existing interventions do not cater to older adults with stroke (OAwS), especially those with high motor impairment, who require adjunct therapeutic agents to independently perform challenging exercises. We examined the feasibility of Smartphone-based Exercise Training after Stroke (SETS) with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). A total of 12 participants (67 ± 5 years) with stroke (onset > 6 months) exhibiting moderate-to-high motor impairment (Chedoke McMaster Leg ≤ 4/7) underwent 6 weeks of multicomponent (gait, functional strength, dynamic balance) training integrated with FES to paretic lower limb muscles. Primary measures included safety and adherence. Secondary measures included motivation, acceptability and attitude, usability, and clinical measures of gait and balance function like the 10-Meter Walk Test and Mini-BESTest. Participants reported no adverse events and moderate-to-high adherence (84.17 ± 11.24%) and improvement (up to 40%) in motivation, acceptability, and attitude and system usability. Participants also showed pre-post improvements in all measures of gait and balance function (p < 0.05). Integrating SETS and FES is feasible and yields short-term gains in gait and balance function among OAwS. Future studies could validate our findings by examining its efficacy with control groups to identify the differential effects of SETS and FES.

Background: Functional disability is a growing concern in aging populations with chronic health conditions, yet few studies have compared disability profiles across diagnostic categories using standardized tools. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the functional profiles of adults with neurological, musculoskeletal, and chronic pain conditions using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and to examine differences by age and sex. Methods: A total of 419 participants (median age = 73 years; 73% female) completed the 36-item WHODAS 2.0. Diagnoses were classified into three groups: neurological (n = 134), musculoskeletal (n = 230), and pain-related (n = 55). Domain-level scores were analyzed using non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations. Results: revealed that neurological conditions were associated with the highest disability levels, particularly in cognition, interpersonal relations, and participation. Musculoskeletal conditions showed greater impairments in mobility and self-care, while pain-related conditions demonstrated variable disability, especially in participation. Women reported higher disability scores in the neurologic group, with significant differences observed in the cognition domain among neurological cases (p = 0.048). Age was positively correlated with disability in self-care and mobility, especially in musculoskeletal conditions. Conclusions: These findings highlight the utility of WHODAS 2.0 in identifying domain-specific limitations across clinical populations. They support the need for individualized, diagnosis- and gender-sensitive rehabilitation strategies, and suggest that WHODAS 2.0 can inform targeted care planning and resource allocation in rehabilitation settings. Future research should incorporate longitudinal designs and explore contextual factors influencing functional outcomes.